Skip to content
S1759Senate2015-2016 SessionSame asA3107

Relates to domestic excess line insurance companies

Sponsor James L. SewardSD-51Affects Finance
Status
In Senate Committee
Insurance
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Insurance

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
James L. Seward

Senator · Senate District 51

Chair, Insurance

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to insurance
  2. Referred to insurance

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A3107Assembly

Relates to domestic excess line insurance companies

In Assembly Committee · Insurance · Sponsor Joseph Morelle

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S1759

Title of bill

An act to amend the insurance law, in relation to domestic excess line insurance companies

Purpose

The purpose of this legislation is to facilitate the formation and operation of domestic line insurance companies within New York State.

Read the full memo (655 words)

Summary of provisions

This bill amends insurance law by adding a new article 58 to create domestic excess line insurance companies. Specifically, the bill authorizes the superintendent to provide a certificate of eligibility permitting domestic excess line insurers to enter insurance transactions through excess line licensees, procuring excess line insurance, provide independently procured insurance to the extent permitted by law and conduct an excess line and/or surplus line business in any other state which grants the insurer eligibility The bill would allow a New York-domiciled insurer to be treated as non-admitted in New York for the purposes of writing surplus lines policies in New York. Further, the legislation defines a domestic lines insurance company and provides that a domestic excess line insurance company is deemed a non-admitted insurer for the purposes of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub L. No. 111-203.

Existing law

The insurance law currently does not provide for the formation and operation of a domestic excess line insurance company within New York State.

Justification

The excess line market is an important segment of New York's insurance marketplace. The excess line market provides a source of additional insurance capacity and an avenue for coverage in situations involving hard-to-place risks that the licensed market cannot or will not write. Historically, an insurance group would have two surplus line insurers. The first would underwrite excess and surplus business in 49 states, but could not do so in its state of incorporation where it is licensed. This required a second surplus line insurer to be incorporated in a different state, so it could underwrite excess and surplus risk in the one other state where the other insurer could not. Six states (Illinois, Arkansas, Delaware, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Oklahoma) have enacted laws to permit an insurance company to incorporate an insurer under their laws for the purposes of underwriting excess and surplus line risks through excess and surplus line brokers.

Under current law, excess line admitted carriers are not permitted to write coverage on the New York portion of a multistate surplus line policy. It then becomes necessary for such company to obtain that portion of coverage from another insurer through a separate policy, domiciled outside New York State, solely to write surplus lines business in New York.

Further, insurer which underwrite an excess and surplus line multistate risk under the excess and surplus line laws of the insurers home state, but which has risk exposures in a state where the insurer is licensed, have exposure that a court located where the insurer is licensed will not apply the excess and surplus law, but may apply the

law relating to licensed insurers. The bill if enacted would avoid inconsistent court interpretations which occasionally apply the law, which applies only to licensed insurers to a policy issued as an excess line policy.

In enacting this legislation New York would maintain a competitive edge and join the six other states which now authorize such incorporations. Domestic excess line insurer legislation would create operational cost savings and efficiencies for such insurers and permit these insurers to operate exclusively as excess and surplus lines. In addition to efficiencies, reductions in cost and better service for policyholders, allowing a New York domestic insurer to offer surplus lines coverage in all fifty states, including its state of domicile, would spur economic growth in the New York marketplace by helping to attract new businesses and jobs to New York and prevent the movement of businesses and jobs away from New York.

Legislative history

S 3858 of 2013-14; S 6808 of 2012

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

120 days after it shall have become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.