Skip to content
S4387Senate2015-2016 SessionSame asA2412

Relates to the creation of Melinda's Law in relation to the basis for removal of children

Sponsor Martin J. GoldenSD-22Affects Health
Status
In Senate Committee
Children And Families
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Children And Families

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Martin J. Golden

Senator · Senate District 22

Chair, Civil Service And Pensions

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to children and families
  2. Referred to children and families

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A2412Assembly

Relates to the creation of Melinda's Law in relation to the basis for removal of children

In Assembly Committee · Children And Families · Sponsor Al Graf

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S4387

Title of bill

An act to amend the family court act, in relation to the basis for removal of children and the creation of "Melinda's Law"

Purpose

To provide a safe harbor for a non-abusive spouse to report abuse while still retaining custody of children.

Read the full memo (708 words)

Summary of provisions

Section 1 of this bill provides that this act will be known as "Melinda's Law."

Section 2 of this bill provides for the legislative intent. Threats by the abusive spouse to call Child Protective Services are often used as a means to compel subjugation from the non-abusive spouse. This was the case for Melinda. The abuse she and her children suffered at the hands of her husband was horrific, and her husband used the threat of her children being taken away from her to keep her in the abusive relationship.

Section 3 of this bill amends section 1012 of the Family Court Act, adding a new subdivision (1) to define "domestic violence." "Domestic violence" is defined as any conduct which would constitute an offense in the penal law, and created a substantial risk of physical or emotional harm regardless of whether such injury occurred, or any other abuse that creates a substantial risk of physical or emotional harm to such person or such person's child, regardless of whether such harm occurred, including but not limited to verbal, emotional or psychological abuse, including slapping. A new subdivision (m) is also added to define "victim spouse or domestic partner subjected to domestic violence." This is defined as the respondent spouse or domestic partner who is the non-abusive spouse or domestic partner, and is determined to be subjected to domestic violence as defined by the previous subdivision (1).

Section 4 of this bill amends section 1017 of the Family Court Act by adding a new subdivision 1-a to provide for procedure determining whether there is a suitable person related to the child for custody purposes in the case of domestic violence.

This bill addresses a dilemma faced by many parents who are victims of domestic violence. One parent in New York that struggled with this dilemma is "Melinda," whose full name is not used to protect her family's privacy. Melinda is a woman suffering from battered person syndrome as a result of over twenty years of physical and psychological abuse by her husband. Like many parents who suffer from battered person syndrome, Melinda accepted her abuse with the belief that her children needed a father. Eventually, the abuse was directed at the children, prompting Melinda to warn her husband that she would go to the authorities if the abuse continued. In response, Melinda's husband issued his own warning: that if she were to report him, Child Protective Services would take their children away.

Unfortunately, her husband's threat was not unfounded. Current law does not adequately protect the interests of victims of domestic violence, who are deemed virtual accomplices in the abuse despite

often being the party who reported the abuse in the first place. This is fundamentally unfair. The law should not lend credence to the threats of abusers who coerce their victims into remaining silent about domestic violence. Instead, the law should allow good parents to report domestic violence with the confidence that they will not be separated from their children for doing so. This bill achieves that goal while protecting the interests of the child through several safeguards. First, where the court deems a victim parent a "non-respondent" and awards custody to that parent, the court shall issue a protection order against the abusive parent removing such parent from the child's home. Second, the court is prohibited from awarding custody to a non-respondent parent where such parent has been neglectful or where serious crimes such as murder or sexual crimes have been committed. Third, the court shall only award custody to the victim parent if it is in the best interests of the child. This grant of judicial discretion will allow courts t o take into account other relevant circumstances not explicitly provided for in this bill.

Legislative history

2014: S.4691 - Referred to Children and Families 2013: S.4691 - Referred to Children and Families

Fiscal implications

None to the State

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.