Skip to content
S476Senate2015-2016 SessionSame asA888

Relates to prohibiting retained asset accounts

Sponsor Ruben DiazSD-32+1 co-sponsorAffects Finance
Status
In Senate Committee
Insurance
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Insurance

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Ruben Diaz

Senator · Senate District 32

1 Co-sponsor

History

  1. Referred to insurance
  2. Referred to insurance

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A888Assembly

Relates to prohibiting retained asset accounts

In Assembly Committee · Insurance · Sponsor Michael G. Miller

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the insurance law, in relation to prohibiting retained-asset accounts

Purpose or general idea of bill

Bans retained-asset accounts.

Summary of specific provisions

Section 1. Amends section 3213 of the Insurance Law. Prohibits proceeds from a life insurance policy to be held in a retained-asset account held by the insurer. Defines a retained-asset account.

Section 2. Effective Date

Existing law

None

Justification

A news report in Bloomberg News (July 28, 2010) told the story of a twenty-four year old Army sergeant who had been killed by a bomb in Afghanistan and his $400,000 life insurance policy held by Prudential Financial, Inc. Unfortunately, the money wasn't deposited in a bank account guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. It was held in a general corporate account - a retained-asset account controlled by Prudential, where it continued to earn investment income. While Prudential earned 4.8% on income held in retained-asset accounts, it usually paid the survivors only 1% interest.

This legislation would prohibit retained asset accounts. Life insurance policies should be paid in full upon the death of a beneficiary and not retained in an account controlled by the insurer. Corporations like Prudential must not be allowed to earn millions of dollars on its insurance policies while at the same time only paying out a fraction to the survivors.

Prior legislative history

2014: S.13 - Referred to Insurance/A.638- Referred to Insurance 2013: S.13 - Referred to Insurance/A.638- Referred to Insurance 2012: S.504 - Referred to Insurance/A.683 - Referred to Insurance 2011: S.504 - Defeated in Insurance/A.683 - Referred to Insurance 2010: S.8469 - Referred to Rules

Fiscal implications

None to state.

Effective date

Sixty days after it shall have become law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.