Skip to content
S5507Senate2015-2016 Session

Establishes an annual spending growth cap and increases the maximum capacity of the rainy day fund

Sponsor Joseph E. RobachSD-56+5 co-sponsorsAffects Finance
Status
In Assembly Committee
Ways And Means
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 5 of 7

In Assembly · Ways And Means

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Joseph E. Robach

Senator · Senate District 56

Chair, Transportation

History

  1. Referred to ways and means
  2. Delivered to assembly
  3. Passed senateVote 39–22
  4. Ordered to third reading cal.7
  5. Committee discharged and committed to rules
  6. Referred to finance
  7. Referred to finance

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:S5507

Title of bill

An act to amend the state finance law, in relation to establishing a spending cap and increasing the maximum capacity of the rainy day fund

Purpose

This legislation will cap the growth of state spending and increase the allowable reserve of the rainy day fund.

Summary of provisions

Section one of the bill would amend the State Finance Law ("SFL") to add a new Article 17, establishing a state spending cap.

* New SFL § 244 sets for definitions for article 17.

* New SFL § 245 establishes a spending cap, which limits the growth of state operating funds spending to no more than-the average rate of inflation of the three previous calendar. years. In addition, the section requires the governor to certify that the executive budget is consistent with the cap and the comptroller will provide, within five days of action by the Legislature upon the budget, a determination as to whether the state budget as enacted exceeds the annual spending growth cap. Finally, the section provides that if the Comptroller finds that the state budget as enacted exceeds the annual spending growth cap, the Governor must take corrective action, such as a veto, reducing state agency spending within the control of the Executive or working with the Legislature to enact spending reductions, to ensure that funding is limited to the amount of the annual spending cap.

* New SFL § 246 provides that upon a finding of an emergency by the Governor, he or she may declare-an emergency b executive order. Based upon such declaration, the Governor may submit and the Legislature may authorize by a two-thirds super majority a budget containing a percent- age increase in state operating fund spending over the prior fiscal year that exceeds the annual spending growth cap.

Section 2 of the bill would increase the maximum capacity of the state's rainy day reserve from 3 percent of General Fund spending to 10 percent of General Fund spending.

Section 4 would make the act effective.

Existing law

SFL § 92-cc (2) establishes a maximum balance in the rainy day reserve fund of three percent of the aggregate amount projected to be disbursed annually from the General Fund.

Justification

State government spending has grown substantially in recent years espe- cially in good economic times. Such growth has forced the State to take drastic actions to stabilize; its finances when revenues decline dramat- ically during periods of economic difficulty. For example, from 2002-03 to 2007-08, State Operating Funds spending grew from $52.8 billion to $77.0 billion -- an average annual rate of7.86 percent. In great part due to this dramatic expansion in spending, the State needed to address a nearly $20.1 billion deficit during last year's budget process. To end this pattern of boom and bust cycle budgeting, and impose greater fiscal discipline on state government, this legislation would enact a strict can limiting the growth of State Operating Funds spending. It also significantly increases the maximum capacity of the State's rainy day reserve so that surpluses that accrue as a result of this cap can be used to help address revenue declines during times of economic difficul- ty.

If the cap proposed in this legislation had been in place from 2002-03 to 2007-08, average annual spending growth during that period would have averaged 2.6 percent. Additionally, 2007-08 State Operating Funds spend- ing would have totaled $60.0 billion - $17.0 billion lower than actual results.

Legislative history

2014 Referred to Rules

Fiscal implications

To be determined

Effective date

30 days after it shall have become law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.