What's happening
Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.
Why it matters
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Sponsors
No co-sponsors yet.
History
- Substituted by A7738A
- Ordered to third reading cal.1986
- Committee discharged and committed to rules
- Print number 5639a
- Amend and recommit to insurance
- Referred to insurance
- Referred to insurance
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Requires insurers to provide and retain a signed notice to claimants in relation to insured's right to have a vehicle repaired in the shop of his/her choice
Signed by Governor · Sponsor William Magnarelli
Full text
The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the insurance law, in relation to collision or comprehensive coverage on motor vehicles
Purpose or general idea of bill
The bill would protect the rights of insured motorists to have their vehicles repaired at the shop of their choice. It does this by requiring insurance companies to inform the insured of their rights under the law.
Summary of specific provisions
Amends Section 2610 of the Insurance Law to require insurers to place in the repair estimate a statement informing the insured of their right to have their vehicle repaired at a shop of their choice.
Justification
An economic impact report prepared in 2006 by Frederic B. Jennings, Jr., Ph.D. for the NYS Auto Collision Technicians Association, Inc., provides evidence that automobile insurance companies in New York State are artificially suppressing payment for labor rates paid to auto body repair shops, and are thereby jeopardizing the safety of drivers on New York roads. The report argues that suppression of labor rates has reduced the quality of repairs completed in many auto body repair shops, and therefore has jeopardized driver safety.
In an effort to reduce costs, automobile insurance companies enter into "preferred" shop agreements with auto body repair shops, such that the preferred shop provides a discount to individuals insured by that insurance company. Automobile insurance companies may then refer claimants to those shops when asked for a referral. Under current law, insurance companies are permitted to pay the lowest price estimate on repairs, as long as the repairs restore the vehicle to pre-accident condition.
The President of the Auto Collision Technicians Association asserts that member shops regularly see customers in need of re-repairs for a poor job done by another body shop, generally the "preferred shop" recommended by the insurance company. In most instances, the insurance company must pay for the cost of the re-repair after significant hassle and legal negotiation on the part of the consumer. The Association estimates that this need for regular re-repairs to fix poor initial repair jobs actually has the effect of increasing auto insurance premiums, despite the claims of auto insurance companies that suppression of labor rates reduces monthly premiums to customers.
Preferred shops establish relationships with the insurers by agreeing to complete repair work within the price guidelines set by the insurance companies. This practice of establishing rigid price guidelines or caps goes beyond the legitimate right of the insurer to negotiate the price of repair. It has the effect of limiting consumer choices by dividing repair shops into two groups: the cut-rate shops preferred by the insurers, and independent shops which can be effectively black-listed by insurance company policies and procedures.
The proposed legislation would require insurers to inform customers of their right to select a repair shop and to make decisions regarding the type of repair done to their vehicle.
Prior legislative history
New bill. Similar to A.1537 of 2015.
Fiscal implications
None.
Effective date
180 days after becoming law.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.