Skip to content
S6448Senate2015-2016 SessionSame asA9347

Relates to improving evaluations of the potential impact of rules on jobs and employment opportunities

Sponsor Terrence P. MurphySD-40Affects Economy
Status
Vetoed
Impact
Pending
Outcome
Vetoed

Bill progress

Vetoed

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Terrence P. Murphy

Senator · Senate District 40

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Vetoed memo.277
  2. Delivered to governor
  3. Returned to senate
  4. Passed assembly
  5. Ordered to third reading rules cal.448
  6. Substituted for A9347A
  7. Referred to governmental operations
  8. Delivered to assembly
  9. Passed senateVote 61–0
  10. Amended on third reading 6448a
  11. Advanced to third reading
  12. 2nd report cal.
Show 2 earlier actions
  1. 1st report cal.886
  2. Referred to commerce, economic development and small business

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9347Assembly

Relates to improving evaluations of the potential impact of rules on jobs and employment opportunities

Assembly Floor Calendar · Sponsor Kenneth Zebrowski

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the state administrative procedure act, in relation to improving evaluations of the potential impact of rules on jobs and employment opportunities

Purpose

This bill would make various improvements to the process for evaluating the potential impact of proposed rules on jobs and employment opportunities. The current process, while useful, does not provide sufficient information on the quality of jobs that could be gained or lost by pursuing various policy choices, and does not guarantee that the most appropriate data and methodologies are used.

Summary of provisions

Section 1 amends § 201-a of the State Administrative Procedure Act (SAPA) to revise the process for reviewing the impact of a proposed rule on jobs and employment opportunities. The following substantive improvements would be made to the process:

*subdivision (2) (b) (v) is amended to require information on measures that the proposing agency or any other state agency has taken or could take to minimize any adverse impacts on jobs (e.g., by instituting new apprenticeship or educational programs);

*subdivision (2) (e) is amended to provide that, if the Commissioners of Labor and Economic Development have indicated that further evaluation is needed, an agency that is unable to determine the job impact of a proposal may not adopt until it has performed the additional analysis or the statutory time period has run;

*a new subdivision (2)(j) provides that the agency shall make its methodology and data or data sources available for public review and validation;

*subdivision (6)(a) is amended to clarify that job impact statements do not need to be prepared for consensus rules; and

*paragraphs (b) & (c) of subdivision (6) are amended to require consideration of the quality of jobs and employment opportunities that could be affected, including the impact of a rule on average wage levels, hours and or duration of employment, or other impacts that could represent a substantial adverse impact on incomes or economic security.

Section 2 through 6 amend various subdivisions of § 202 to better integrate the publication of job impact statements into the statutory provisions for preparation of rulemaking notices.

Justification

When state agencies develop rules and regulations, it is of critical importance that the potential impacts on current jobs and future employment are fully explored. This will enable policymakers to design regulatory programs in a way that accomplishes desired objectives while promoting maximum opportunities for high-quality jobs for New Yorkers.

Legislative history

New Bill

Fiscal implications

None

Effective date

First day of January after having become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.