Skip to content
S6820Senate2015-2016 SessionSame asA9145

Prohibits a consumer reporting agency or lender from using an individual's internet viewing history to determine such individual's credit worthiness

Status
In Senate Committee
Consumer Protection
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Consumer Protection

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Michael H. Ranzenhofer

Senator · Senate District 61

Chair, Corporations, Authorities And Commissions

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Print number 6820a
  2. Amend and recommit to consumer protection
  3. Referred to consumer protection

Companion bill

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the general business law and the banking law, in relation to prohibiting a consumer reporting agency or lender from using an individual's internet viewing history to determine such individual's credit worthiness

Purpose or general idea of the bill

To prohibit a consumer reporting agency or lender from using an individual's internet viewing history to determine such individual's credit worthiness

Summary of specific provisions

Section 1. Section 380-j of the general business law is amended by adding a new subdivision (h) to read as follows:

(h)No consumer reporting agency shall collect, evaluate, report, or maintain in the file on a consumer the consumer's use of internet or web browsing history as a factor to determine the consumer's credit score, standing or credit capacity.

Section 2. Section 352 of the banking law is amended by adding a new sixth undesignated paragraph to read as follows:

No licensee shall collect, evaluate, report or maintain in the file on a borrower, the borrower's use of internet or internet viewing history as a factor to determine the borrower's credit worthiness, credit standing or credit capacity.

Section 3 contains the effective date.

Justification

Consumers in the United States continue to be under attack by the fuzzy math used to calculate credit scores. The US General Accounting Office has estimated that some 75% of credit scores are wrong based on incorrect information collected by credit bureaus and attached to individual credit scores.

As if this was not detrimental enough to the average consumer, credit scores are used by employers to screen potential employees, by landlords and even by graduate schools for students applying to business majors. The errors on these reports and the fuzzy math used to create the credit score are impacting every aspect of our lives.

To make matters worse, the FICO score, a measure of consumer credit risk, which has become a fixture of consumer lending in the United States, is moving to add consumer's social network as another variable in the more than 100 variable equation used to compute a consumer's credit score.

FICO is looking to lumping all of the individual consumers' Internet viewing history into the consumer credit score. A value will be added to the consumer's choice of websites viewed and that subjective value will be used as a variable to derive a new credit score for individual consumers. This is an obvious invasion of privacy and another fuzzy math approach which will hurt consumers.

It is obvious that individuals in low income communities, immigrants with limited English proficiency, teens and young adults will have an online viewing history that is substantially different than those who are native born, with higher incomes and older.

So why should consumers be further stigmatized and penalized via worsening credit scores based on whether or not they read the New York Times versus the NY Post or because they only play online games and never visit the website of the Economist? FICO's attempt to do this should be banned and this legislation does exactly that.

Prior legislative history

No prior legislative history.

Fiscal implications for state and local government

None

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.