Skip to content
S7079Senate2015-2016 Session

Provides that a special education settlement agreement between a city school district in a city of one million or more and a child's parent or person in parental relation shall have a term of not less than 3 year

Sponsor Simcha FelderSD-17Affects Local Government
Status
In Senate Committee
Rules
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Rules

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Simcha Felder

Senator · Senate District 17

Chair, Children And FamiliesChair, New York City Education Subcommittee

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Committed to rules
  2. Advanced to third reading
  3. 2nd report cal.
  4. 1st report cal.700
  5. Referred to cities

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the general city law and the education law, in relation to the duration of settlement agreements in a school district in a city having a population of one million or more

Purpose

This purpose of this bill is to provide for three year settlements for disputes between parents and school districts on special education placements, and to establish a special education placement process that will help ensure students with disabilities are placed in the appropriate programs and receive resolution of their impartial due process hearing and tuition reimbursement in a timely manner.

Summary of provisions

Section one of the bill would amend the general city law to provide three year settlements for disputes between parents and school districts on special education placements.

Read the full memo (790 words)

Section two of this bill would amend the education law to provide a parents appeal of a special education placement recommendation by a school district in a city having a population of one million or more to be resolved via settlement, or decision of the impartial hearing officer, or by a state review officer, within any applicable time periods prescribed by federal law. This provision would further state that nothing contained within such provision would be deemed to prohibit any parent or school district from seeking judicial review by any court of competent jurisdiction.

This section would further provide that upon the signing of a written settlement agreement between a child's parent or person in parental relation and the board of education of a school district in a city having a population of one million or more or a state agency, or the decision, order or judgment of an impartial hearing officer, state review officer or a court finding that a unilateral parental placement was appropriate and that tuition payment should be granted for such unilateral placement, as provided by section 1412(a)(10)(c) of title 20 of the United States Code and the implementing federal regulations, the amount of such payment and the timeline or schedule for making such payment shall be set forth in any such settlement or decision, order or judgment.

Section three of this bill would further require that, in a school district in a city having a population of one million or more upon the decision of an impartial hearing officer, state review officer or a court finding that a unilateral parental placement was appropriate and that tuition payment should be granted for such unilateral placement, such tuition payment shall continue in future years, at the same percentage of the total tuition cost as the previous year's payment, until the committee on special education determines the child's needs can be met in another public or approved private school program and revises the child's individualized education program to recommend such placement; provided however that where the parent or person in parental relation brings a due process proceeding to challenge such revised placement. The unilateral parental placement for which tuition payment was granted shall be the pendency placement.

Justification

For a school district in a city having a population of one million or more, this bill would provide for an improved special education placement process that will help ensure students with disabilities are placed in the appropriate programs, and receive resolution of their impartial due process hearing and tuition reimbursement in a timely manner. Consistent with Federal law, this bill would further provide both school districts and parents with the authorization they need to appropriately resolve special education placements in the manner best suited for the child in accordance with their individualized education program.

This bill would additionally provide, that once a school district and the parents of a child receiving a special education placement reach a resolution of an appeal involving such placement, that such settlement agreement, in a school district in a city having a population of one million or more, be made for a term of not less than three years, contingent upon there being no substantial change in the child's individualized education program, and consistent with any other applicable time periods prescribed by federal law.

Legislative history

New bill but similar to S.7691 - Passed Senate 2014.

Budget implications

None noted.

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately, provided, however, that the amendments to clause (b) of subparagraph 3 of paragraph b of subdivision 1 of section 4402 of the education law, made by section 2 of this act, shall not affect the expiration of such clause and shall expire therewith; provided, further, that the amendments to subdivision 1 of section 4404 of the education law, made by section 3 of this act, shall not effect the expiration of such subdivision and shall expire therewith.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.