Skip to content
S7336Senate2015-2016 SessionSame asA9904

Establishes a prohibition on the imposition of any tax, fee or local charge on carry out merchandise bags

Sponsor Simcha FelderSD-17+8 co-sponsorsAffects Finance
Status
In Assembly Committee
Ways And Means
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 5 of 7

In Assembly · Ways And Means

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Simcha Felder

Senator · Senate District 17

Chair, Children And FamiliesChair, New York City Education Subcommittee

History

  1. Referred to ways and means
  2. Delivered to assembly
  3. Passed senateVote 35–24
  4. Advanced to third reading
  5. 2nd report cal.
  6. 1st report cal.705
  7. Referred to cities

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9904Assembly

Establishes a prohibition on the imposition of any tax, fee or local charge on carry out merchandise bags

In Assembly Committee · Ways And Means · Sponsor Michael Cusick

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the general city law, in relation to prohibiting the imposition of any tax, fee or local charge on carry out merchandise bags

Purpose

This bill seeks to prohibit the imposition and/or collection of any tax, fee or local charge on carry out merchandise bags.

Summary of provisions

Section one of the bill would amend the general city law to add a new section 13-D to prohibit the imposition and/or collection of any tax, fee or local charge on carry out merchandise bags.

Read the full memo (847 words)

More specifically, subdivision one of this bill would provide a definition of carry out merchandise bag and retail store, while subdivision two would establish a prohibition on any city, including a city of one million or more, from imposing any tax, fee or local charge on any carry out merchandise bag, and subdivision three would establish a corollary prohibition on any city, including a city of one million or more, from collecting any tax, fee or local charge on any carry out merchandise bag.

Justification

Carry out merchandise bags are any plastic, paper or other bag or carrying container, provided by a retail store, to a customer of that store, for the purpose of carrying and/or transporting merchandise lawfully obtained at such store. They further include any plastic carryout bag as defined by subdivision four of section 27-2701 of the environmental conservation law. In brief, they are most often disposable bags provided to customers by a grocery or other retail store for the purposes of carrying or transporting their food items or other merchandise from the store to the customer's home.

For decades, grocery stores and retailers have provided customers with disposable carry out bags to transport their merchandise. For many years, such disposable bags were predominantly made of paper, but in an effort to accommodate advocates in the environmental movement and promote environmental protection, so as to save trees and switch to a more eco-friendly recyclable material, most grocery stores and retail establishments have switched to plastic bags and containers. These disposable bags are easily recyclable, safe, convenient and healthy, and have become the standard in the retail marketplace.

Despite the fact that there are many recycling programs for carryout plastic bags, both in practice and in law, there has now developed a movement in the environmental community to abandon its previous advocacy for disposable plastic bags and advance the promotion of permanent, customer owned shopping bags. As consumers clearly prefer the disposable bags presently provided by grocery stores and other retail establishments, those who favor the permanent, customer owned shopping bags, now seek to force consumers to modify their behavior, by means of the imposition of a tax or fee on every disposable carry out merchandise bag provided by a retailer.

Although well intentioned, this bag tax or fee idea, is actually harmful to consumers, families, retailers and public health. It is not only impracticable to believe that every consumer can provide their own carry out bag or container, but imposing a tax or fee on every bag provided by the retailer, would significantly increase the cost of groceries and every retail item sold in any city that imposes such a tax or fee. Families who are already facing a high cost of living, would be seriously and negatively impacted by this misguided and unnecessary tax or fee.

Worse still, if customers do begin to provide their own carry out bags, as those who support this tax or fee intend, such reusable bags will undoubtedly present a serious public health issue. For such reusable bags often present the risk of bringing into the store a contaminate of food based disease, bacteria or other illness, which can cause serious cross contamination or infection for both the customer, or other customers, or store employees. Issues such as salmonella, or other bacteria or viruses, which escape from food previously carried in the reusable bag, or which are being spread from the exposure to customer's own home environment, can be easily spread from exposure to the reusable bag.

To bring such source of contaminates or disease back into the store is both ill advised and dangerous. Accordingly, unless the reusable bag has been completely cleaned and disinfected, which is a practice few consumers with such reusable bags follow, this practice is one that could well cause serious harm and disease to all the people exposed to the bag. There is a reason why health care facilities, restaurants, hotels and other entities that provide food and exposure to the public use disposable and sterilized items. There is a reason why grocery and retail stores have been using disposable bags for generations. To do otherwise is simply irresponsible, and non disposable bags illustrate this avoidable and ill advised risk. As a result, it can be seen that this misguided tax or fee desperately needs to be prohibited from being imposed by any city.

Legislative history

This is a new bill.

Budget implications

None noted.

Effective date

This act would take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.