Skip to content
S7704Senate2015-2016 SessionSame asA9765

Relates to enforcement of the freshwater wetland law

Sponsor Tony AvellaSD-11+1 co-sponsorAffects Environment & Energy
Status
In Senate Committee
Environmental Conservation
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Environmental Conservation

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Tony Avella

Senator · Senate District 11

Chair, Ethics

1 Co-sponsor

History

  1. Referred to environmental conservation

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9765Assembly

Relates to enforcement of the freshwater wetland law

Assembly Floor Calendar · Sponsor Steven Englebright

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the environmental conservation law, in relation to enforcement of the freshwater wetland law

Purpose or general idea of bill

To expand the protection of freshwater wetlands by conforming enforcement provisions to those applicable to tidal wetlands.

Summary of specific provisions

The bill would amend § 71-2303 of the Environmental Conservation Law to strengthen enforcement provisions for violations related to freshwater wetlands as follows:

*specify that each violation of the freshwater wetland law will be considered a separate and distinct violation, and in the case of a continuing violation each day will be considered a distinct violation;

*specify the conditions in which the Commissioner of Environmental Conservation may issue a cease-and-desist order, and provide the violator with the opportunity to be heard within ten days; and,

*authorize a violator to be required to restore the area adjacent to the freshwater wetland as well as the wetland itself.

Justification

Both freshwater and tidal wetlands are invaluable resources that lessen the impact of flooding, often are habitat for wildlife, fish and shellfish, including commercially-harvested species; and provide natural mechanisms for protecting and restoring water quality. The condition of areas adjacent to wetlands can have a profound effect on the health and viability of the wetland itself because they act as a buffer and protect the abutting wetland from deterioration. In limiting activities landowners may take without a permit in areas adjacent to saltwater wetlands, the Legislature has recognized the essential connection between the wetland and its adjacent area and the need to limit adjacent area activities.

In the 2005 Rockland County case of Bradley Corporate Park v. Crotty, the validity of DEC's order to restore adjacent areas of freshwater wetlands as well as the damaged wetland, was challenged because of the absence of the phrase "or area immediately adjacent thereto." Although the Appellate Division rejected the argument in that case, the current law should be clarified to remove any doubt about the extent of the. Commissioner's power to obtain restoration of the wetlands damaged by illegal acts.

Prior legislative history

2016: New Senate Bill/ A.9765 (Englebright) 2011: A.5638 (Sweeney) - Passed the Assembly.

Fiscal implications for state and local governments

None

Effective date

This act shall take effect on the first of December next succeeding the date on which it shall have become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.