Skip to content
S7954Senate2015-2016 SessionSame asA9995

Prohibits contracts for the purchase or lease of consumer goods from restricting venue in an action relating to such contract

Sponsor Tony AvellaSD-11Affects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Judiciary
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Judiciary

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Tony Avella

Senator · Senate District 11

Chair, Ethics

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to judiciary

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9995Assembly

Prohibits contracts for the purchase or lease of consumer goods from restricting venue in an action relating to such contract

In Senate Committee · Rules · Sponsor Helene Weinstein

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to claims relating to consumer goods

Purpose of bill

This bill would proscribe venue limitations in contracts relating to the adjudication or arbitration of disputes concerning consumer goods.

Summary of provisions of bill

This bill defines consumer goods in the same manner as exists in current law, e.g. General Business Law, § 399-C, and states that contracts purporting to limit or set venue for the adjudication or arbitration of disputes concerning same are deemed void. The bill allows for the place of trial to be designated in either the county of the consumer's residence, in addition to other venue provisions contained in law.

Justification

All too often, consumers who seek judicial or arbitral relief concerning contracts involving consumer goods are limited by contractual boilerplate which purports to set venue in far flung locations which are inconvenient or impossible for consumers to attend. E.g. Karlsberg v. Hunter Mtn. Ski Bowl, Inc., 131 AD 3d 1121 (2nd Dept 2015). While parties to arms length transactions should be free to fashion venue requirements to their satisfaction, the inequities involved in consumer transactions warrant a legislative determination that boilerplate clauses which create hardship to consumers should not be enforced.

Legislative history

2016: A.9995 (Weinstein)

Fiscal implications for state and local governments

None.

Effective date

The thirtieth day after it shall have become a law, and shall apply to all actions and arbitration proceedings which have not been commenced prior to such effective date.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.