What's happening
This bill prohibits New York state agencies from imposing enforcement quotas or using them as the primary criterion for employee evaluation, discipline, or reward.
Why it matters
Reduces pressure for excessive enforcement. By banning quotas and their use as the main evaluation metric, this bill aims to prevent state agency employees from feeling compelled to issue citations or penalties simply to meet numerical targets, which can sometimes lead to unfair or unnecessary enforcement actions.
Protects employee rights and job security. The bill prohibits agencies from rewarding, penalizing, transferring, or threatening employees based on quota performance, helping to ensure that evaluations and disciplinary decisions are based on overall job performance rather than arbitrary numbers.
Maintains managerial oversight without quotas. Agencies can still collect and analyze enforcement data for resource planning and management purposes, and supervisors can discuss performance issues with staff—but these metrics cannot be the primary basis for evaluation, striking a balance between accountability and fairness.
Clarifies what constitutes a quota. The bill provides a detailed definition of “enforcement quota,” covering not just raw numbers of citations or penalties, but also dollar amounts and comparative performance metrics, closing loopholes that could allow agencies to indirectly pressure employees.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
State agency enforcement officers and employees
The bill would bar agencies, unless otherwise provided by law, from imposing enforcement quotas or rewarding, penalizing or threatening staff based on meeting them.
Immediate supervisors of enforcement staff
The bill would extend quota protections to supervisors and prohibit using quantitative enforcement results as their primary evaluation criterion.
State agency managers
The bill would preserve enforcement forecasting and resource planning while limiting how managers use citation counts, violation totals and penalty amounts to assess staff.
Headline styles
Ban Enforcement Quotas
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
1 Co-sponsor
History
- Referred to governmental operations
- Referred to governmental operations
Full text
2 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
6458
2017-2018 Regular Sessions
IN ASSEMBLY
March 7, 2017
Introduced by M. of A. ZEBROWSKI, SIMOTAS -- read once and referred to the Committee on Governmental Operations
AN ACT to amend the state administrative procedure act, in relation to enforcement of violations
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. The state administrative procedure act is amended by adding a new article 6 to read as follows:
ARTICLE 6
ENFORCEMENT OF VIOLATIONS Section 601. Enforcement of violations.
§ 601. Enforcement of violations. 1. Unless otherwise provided by law, no state agency shall:
(a) impose or suggest any enforcement quota with respect to officers or employees directly involved in enforcement activities or their immediate supervisors;
(b) use records of quantitative enforcement results as the primary criterion to evaluate such officers, employees or supervisors;
(c) reward any officer, employee or supervisor for meeting or exceeding an enforcement quota; or
(d) transfer or in any other manner penalize or threaten, expressly or impliedly, any such officer, employee or supervisor as to his or her employment in a manner, including, but not limited to, a reassignment, a scheduling change, an adverse evaluation, a constructive dismissal, the denial of a promotion, or the denial of overtime, based in whole or in part on such person's failure to meet an enforcement quota.
2. Nothing in this section shall preclude an agency from making and communicating forecasts of enforcement results for planning purposes, and accumulating, tabulating, publishing and using enforcement results for management and control of agency resources so long as enforcement results or tabulations are not used as the primary criterion to evaluate
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD04505-01-7
A. 6458 2
an officer or employee described in subdivision one of this section or to impose or suggest enforcement quotas. In the discharge of a manager's responsibilities, but subject to the provisions of subdivision one of this section, a manager may raise questions with an officer or employee about the number of cases processed or inspections performed by the officer or employee, the amount of time the officer or employee has been spending on individual enforcement activities, or the kind of results the officer or employee has been obtaining, and may use similar standards in evaluating the performance of a supervisor of such officers or employees.
3. As used in this section, "enforcement quota" shall mean a quantitative standard for evaluating or measuring enforcement activities, including but not limited to (a) a specific number of enforcement cases in which citations for violations are made within a specified period of time; (b) the total number of violations found within a specified period; (c) the total dollar amount of penalties associated with enforcement activities within a specified period of time; or (d) any comparison of the enforcement activities of an officer, employee or supervisor with other officers, employees or supervisors, with an average of such activities or with other quantitative standards, when used to penalize or reward officers, employees or supervisors for attaining or failing to attain a specific number of citations for violations and/or penalties within a specified period of time.
§ 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.