Skip to content
A6632Assembly2017-2018 Session

Ban Human Cloning

Official title

“Creates the human cloning prohibition act”

Sponsor Michael J. FitzpatrickAD-8+1 co-sponsorAffects Health
Status
In Assembly Committee
Health
Impact
7/10
Significant
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Health

What's happening

This bill prohibits all forms of human cloning in New York, establishing criminal penalties and professional sanctions for violations.

Why it matters

  1. Casts a wide net by defining "human cloning" broadly. , covering not only the creation of cloned humans for reproduction but also any use of cloning technology to produce human embryos, regardless of intended use (including research). This could impact scientific and medical research involving human embryos.

  2. Imposes severe criminal and professional penalties. , including felony charges for performing or attempting cloning, hefty fines (up to $1 million or twice the financial gain), and permanent revocation of medical licenses for violations. This creates strong legal deterrents and could discourage borderline or related research.

  3. Explicitly distinguishes between prohibited human cloning and other forms of scientific research. (e.g., cloning animals, plants, tissues, or non-embryonic cells), so it does not restrict all genetic or cloning research—only that involving human embryos.

  4. Reflects and codifies ethical concerns about the status and use of human embryos. , making a clear legislative statement about the moral boundaries New York is setting regarding the creation and use of human life for research or reproductive purposes—potentially influencing broader bioethical debates and policy in other states.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Ban Human Cloning

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Michael J. Fitzpatrick

Assembly Member · Assembly District 8

1 Co-sponsor

History

  1. Held for consideration in health
  2. Referred to health
  3. Referred to health

Full text

3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

6632

2017-2018 Regular Sessions

IN ASSEMBLY

March 10, 2017

Introduced by M. of A. FITZPATRICK, FINCH -- read once and referred to the Committee on Health

AN ACT to amend the public health law, in relation to creating the human cloning prohibition act

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "human cloning prohibition act".

§ 2. Legislative findings. The legislature finds that:

At least one company has announced that it has successfully cloned a human being at the early embryonic stage of life, and others have announced that they will attempt to clone a human being using the technique known as somatic cell nuclear transfer. Efforts to create human beings by cloning mark a new and decisive step toward turning human reproduction into a manufacturing process in which human beings are made in laboratories to preordained specifications and, potentially, in multiple copies. Creating cloned live-born human children, so-called "reproductive cloning," begins by creating cloned human beings at the embryonic stage of life, a process which some also propose as a way of creating human embryos for destructive research as sources of stem cells and tissues for possible treatment of other humans, so-called "therapeutic cloning". Many scientists agree that attempts at "reproductive cloning" pose a massive risk of either producing children who are stillborn, unhealthy, or severely disabled, and that attempting "therapeutic cloning" always results in the destruction of human beings at the embryonic stage of life when their stem cells are harvested. Creating new human life solely to be exploited via "reproductive cloning" or destroyed via "therapeutic cloning" in these ways has been condemned on moral grounds by many as displaying a profound disrespect for life.

The distinction between "therapeutic" and "reproductive" cloning is a false distinction scientifically because both begin with the creation of

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD10330-01-7

A. 6632 2

a human being at the embryonic stage of life, one destined for implantation in a womb, one destined for destructive farming of its stem cells; regardless of its ultimate destiny, all human embryos are simultaneously human beings. It will be nearly impossible to ban only attempts at "reproductive cloning" if "therapeutic cloning" is allowed because:

(i) cloning would take place within the privacy of a doctor-patient relationship;

(ii) the transfer of embryos to begin a pregnancy is a simple procedure; and

(iii) any government effort to prevent the transfer of an existing cloned embryo, or to prevent birth once transfer has occurred, would raise substantial moral, legal, and practical issues.

Based on the above findings, it is the purpose of this act to prohibit the use of cloning technology to initiate the development of new human beings at the embryonic stage of life for any purpose, therapeutic or reproductive.

§ 3. The public health law is amended by adding a new article 32-B to read as follows:

ARTICLE 32-B

HUMAN CLONING PROHIBITION ACT Section 3230. Definitions.

3231. Human cloning prohibitions.

3232. Exceptions.

3233. Penalties for violations.

3234. Severability.

§ 3230. Definitions. As used in this article, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

1. "Human cloning" means human asexual reproduction, accomplished by introducing the genetic material of a human somatic cell into an oocyte whose nucleus has been removed or inactivated, to produce a living organism with a human or predominantly human genetic constitution.

2. "Somatic cell" means a cell having a complete set of chromosomes obtained from a living or deceased human body at any stage of development.

3. "Oocyte" means the human female egg.

4. "Embryo" means an organism of the species homo sapiens from the single cell stage to eight weeks development.

5. "Fetus" means an organism of the species homo sapiens from eight weeks development until complete expulsion or extraction from a woman's body, or removal from an artificial womb or other similar environment designed to nurture the development of such organism.

§ 3231. Human cloning prohibitions. It shall be unlawful for any person or entity, public or private, to intentionally or knowingly:

1. perform or attempt to perform human cloning;

2. participate in an attempt to perform human cloning;

3. transfer or receive the product of human cloning for any purpose; or

4. transfer or receive, in whole or in part, any oocyte, embryo, fetus, or human somatic cell, for the purpose of human cloning.

§ 3232. Exceptions. Nothing in this article shall restrict areas of scientific research not specifically prohibited by this article, including in vitro fertilization, the administration of fertility-enhancing drugs, research in the use of nuclear transfer or other cloning techniques to produce molecules, DNA, tissues, organs, plants, or animals other than humans, or cells other than human embryos.

A. 6632 3

§ 3233. Penalties for violations. 1. (a) Any person or entity that violates subdivisions one and two of section thirty-two hundred thirtyone of this article shall be guilty of a class D felony.

(b) Any person or entity that violates subdivisions three and four of section thirty-two hundred thirty-one of this article shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor.

2. Any person or entity that violates any provision of this article and derives a pecuniary gain from such violation shall be fined up to one million dollars pursuant to the prevailing federal penalty guidelines or twice the amount of gross gain, or any amount intermediate between the foregoing, at the discretion of the court.

3. Any violation of this article shall constitute unprofessional conduct and shall result in permanent revocation of the violator's license to practice medicine.

4. Any violation of this article shall be the basis:

(a) for denying an application for,

(b) for denying an application for the renewal of, or

(c) for revoking any license, permit, certificate, or any other form of permission required to practice or engage in a trade, occupation or profession.

§ 3234. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part of this article shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid and after exhaustion of all further judicial review, the judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part of this article directly involved in the controversy in which the judgment shall have been rendered.

§ 4. This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.