Skip to content
S1982Senate2017-2018 Session

Ban Caller ID Spoofing

Official title

“Provides that a business entity may not alter caller identification information with the intent to defraud or harass a third party or the recipient of the call”

Sponsor Patrick M. GallivanSD-59Affects Public Safety & Consumer Affairs
Status
Stricken
Impact
5/10
Moderate
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Consumer Protection

What's happening

This bill prohibits businesses from transmitting false caller ID information with intent to defraud or harass, and sets penalties for violations.

Why it matters

  1. Targets intentional abuse of caller ID by businesses. The bill focuses specifically on business entities that knowingly transmit false caller ID information with the intent to defraud or harass, aiming to curb sophisticated scams and harassment campaigns that exploit caller ID spoofing.

  2. Empowers the Attorney General with enforcement tools. It authorizes the Attorney General to seek injunctions, restitution for victims, and civil penalties up to $100,000 for violations, making enforcement both swift and potentially costly for offenders.

  3. Protects service providers and law enforcement. The bill shields telecommunications and VoIP service providers from liability when their services are misused by businesses, and exempts law enforcement and court-ordered uses of caller ID manipulation, ensuring legitimate activities aren’t hindered.

  4. Sets clear definitions and limits. By precisely defining terms like "business entity," "caller identification information," and "VoIP service," and by limiting aggregate penalties within a 72-hour period, the law seeks to provide clarity for enforcement and avoid unintended consequences for legitimate businesses.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Ban Caller ID Spoofing

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Patrick M. Gallivan

Senator · Senate District 59

Chair, Crime Victims, Crime And Correction

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Recommit, enacting clause stricken
  2. Referred to consumer protection
  3. Committed to rules
  4. Advanced to third reading
  5. 2nd report cal.
  6. 1st report cal.1321
  7. Referred to consumer protection

Full text

2 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

1982

2017-2018 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

January 11, 2017

Introduced by Sen. GALLIVAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Consumer Protection

AN ACT to amend the general business law and the civil practice law and rules, in relation to prohibiting business entities from transmitting false caller identification information with the intent to defraud or harass any person

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. The general business law is amended by adding a new section 399-ppp to read as follows:

§ 399-ppp. Prohibition on provision of deceptive caller identification information. 1. It shall be unlawful for any business entity, in connection with any telecommunications service or VoIP service, to cause any caller identification service to transmit false caller identification information, with the intent to defraud or harass, when making a call to any person within the state.

2. For purposes of this section:

(a) "Business entity" means a corporation, association, partnership, limited liability company, limited liability partnership or other legal entity.

(b) "Caller identification information" means information provided to an end user by a caller identification service regarding the telephone number of, or other information regarding the origination of, a call made using a telecommunications service or VoIP service.

(c) "Caller identification service" means any service or device designed to provide the user of the service or device with the telephone number of, or other information regarding the origination of, a call made using a telecommunications service or VoIP service. Such term includes automatic number identification services.

(d) "VoIP service" means any service that: enables real time, two-way voice communication originating from or terminating at the user's

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD00179-01-7

S. 1982 2

location in internet protocol or a successor protocol; utilizes a broadband connection at the user's location; and permits a user to receive a call that originates on the public switched telephone network and to terminate a call to the public switched telephone network.

3. Whenever there shall be a violation of this section, an application may be made by the attorney general in the name of the people of the state of New York to a court or justice having jurisdiction to issue an injunction, and upon notice to the defendant, to immediately enjoin and restrain the continuance of such violations; and if it shall appear to the satisfaction of the court or justice, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant has, in fact, violated this section an injunction may be issued by such court or justice enjoining and restraining any further violation, without requiring proof that any person has, in fact, been injured or damaged thereby. The court may make allowances to the attorney general as provided in paragraph six of subdivision (a) of section eighty-three hundred three of the civil practice law and rules. In addition to any such allowances, the court may direct restitution to any victim upon a showing of damages by a preponderance of the evidence. In addition to any such restitution, whenever the court shall determine that a violation of this section has occurred, the court may impose a civil penalty of not more than two thousand dollars per call, up to a total aggregate amount of not more than one hundred thousand dollars, for all calls placed in violation of this section within a continuous seventy-two hour period. In connection with any such proposed application, the attorney general is authorized to take proof and make a determination of the relevant facts and to issue subpoenas in accordance with the civil practice law and rules.

4. Subdivision three of this section does not create, and is not intended to create, any right of action against a telecommunications service provider or VoIP service provider whose service, including caller identification service, is used by a business entity to transmit or display false caller identification information in violation of this section.

5. The provisions of this section shall not apply to any member of a law enforcement unit acting within the scope of his or her assigned duties or to a court order that specifically authorizes the use of caller identification manipulation.

§ 2. Paragraph 6 of subdivision (a) of section 8303 of the civil practice law and rules, as amended by chapter 530 of the laws of 2002, is amended to read as follows:

6. to the plaintiffs in an action or proceeding brought by the [attorney-general] attorney general under [articles] article twenty-two, twenty-two-A, twenty-three-A or thirty-three or section three hundred ninety-one-b, three hundred ninety-nine-ppp, or five hundred twenty-a of the general business law, or under subdivision twelve of section sixty-three of the executive law, or under article twenty-three of the arts and cultural affairs law, or in an action or proceeding brought by the [attorney-general] attorney general under applicable statutes to dissolve a corporation or for usurpation of public office, or unlawful exercise of franchise or of corporate right, a sum not exceeding two thousand dollars against each defendant.

§ 3. This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the general business law and the civil practice law and rules, in relation to prohibiting business entities from transmitting false caller identification information with the intent to defraud or harass any person

Purpose

This legislation would ban business entities from "spoofing." Spoofing is the transmission of false caller identification information with the intent to defraud or harass any person.

Summary of provisions

Section 1. Amends the general business law by adding a new section 399-ppp. Subdivision I of section 399-ppp provides that it shall be unlawful for any business entity, in connection with any telecommunications service or VoIP service, to cause any caller identification service to transmit false caller identification information when making a call to any person within the state with the intent to defraud or harass. Subdivision 2 of section 399-ppp provides definitions of "business identity," "caller identification information," "caller identification service," and "VoIP service." Subdivision 3 of section 399-ppp provides that whenever there is a violation of this section, the attorney general may make an application to a court or justice having jurisdiction to issue an injunction, and upon notice to the defendant, to immediately enjoin and restrain the continuance of such violations. No proof is required that any person has, in fact, been injured or damaged by such violation. The court may also make allowances to the attorney general as provided in paragraph six of subdivision (a) of section 8303 of the civil practice law and rules.

In addition to any such allowances, the court may direct restitution to any victim upon a showing of damages by a preponderance of the evidence. A court may also impose a civil penalty of up to $2,000 per call, with an aggregate amount of up to $100,000 for all calls placed in violation of this section within any continuous seventy-two hour period. Subdivision 4 of section 399-ppp states that this section does not create, and is not intended to create, any right of action against a telecommunications service provider or VoIP service provider whose service, including caller identification service, is used by a business entity to transmit or display false caller identification information in violation of this section. Subdivision 5 of Section 399-ppp provides that the provisions of this section shall not apply to any member of a law enforcement unit acting within the scope of his or her assigned duties or to a court order that specifically authorizes the use of caller identification manipulation.

Section 2. Makes the necessary changes to section 8303 of the civil practice law and rules to reflect the changes made in section 1 of the bill.

Section 3. Sets forth that this act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.

Legislative history

2015-16: S.434/A.7158 Passed Senate/Referred to Consumer Affairs and Protection 2013-14: S.2497-B Referred to Consumer Protection

Fiscal implications

None. EFFECTIVE DATE : This act will take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.