What's happening
This bill updates and expands New York's criminal laws related to cybercrimes, identity theft, and electronic evidence, adding new definitions, penalties, and procedures for prosecuting technology-related offenses.
Why it matters
Expands and clarifies the definitions of key cybercrime terms. such as "computer data," "computer program," "personal identifying information," and "service," reflecting modern technology and digital assets, which means more cyber activities can be prosecuted as crimes.
Introduces and enhances penalties for technology-related crimes. , including new degrees of computer tampering, denial of service attacks, identity theft, and possession of skimmer devices, allowing for harsher punishment for large-scale or repeat offenders and recognizing the greater harms caused by digital crimes.
Enables prosecution and evidence gathering across jurisdictional lines. by allowing New York courts to issue and enforce search warrants for electronic records from companies operating anywhere if they do business or offer services to New Yorkers, addressing challenges of digital evidence stored out-of-state or overseas.
Provides broader protections for victims and increases restitution options. , including for individuals whose identities are stolen, vulnerable elderly or disabled persons, and victims of large-scale data breaches, ensuring that courts can order compensation for time and money spent remediating identity theft or cybercrime harms.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Strengthen Cyber Crime Penalties
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
1 Co-sponsor
History
- Referred to codes
- Delivered to assembly
- Passed senateVote 61–0
- Advanced to third reading
- 2nd report cal.
- 1st report cal.1000
- Referred to codes
- Returned to senate
- Died in assembly
- Referred to codes
- Delivered to assembly
- Passed senateVote 60–0
Show 5 earlier actions
- Ordered to third reading cal.1702
- Committee discharged and committed to rules
- Print number 2406a
- Amend (t) and recommit to codes
- Referred to codes
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Strengthen Cybercrime Penalties
In Assembly Committee · Codes · Sponsor Joseph Lentol
Full text
19 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
2406--A
2017-2018 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
January 13, 2017
Introduced by Sen. GOLDEN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee
AN ACT to amend the penal law and the criminal procedure law, in relation to cyber crimes; and to repeal certain provisions of the penal law relating to scheme to defraud
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Subdivisions 1, 2, 3 and 4 of section 155.00 of the penal law, subdivision 1 as amended by chapter 514 of the laws of 1986, are amended and two new subdivisions 10 and 11 are added to read as follows:
1. "Property" means any money, personal property, real property, computer data, computer program, personal identifying information, secret scientific material, thing in action, evidence of debt or contract, or any article, substance or thing of value, including any gas, steam, water or electricity, which is provided for a charge or compensation.
2. "Obtain" includes, but is not limited to, the bringing about of a transfer or purported transfer of property or of a legal interest therein, whether to the obtainer or another. With regard to personal identifying information, computer data or computer program, obtain includes duplicating, recording, copying, downloading, uploading or printing out the information, data, or program, or obtaining a physical object containing such information. With regard to service, obtain includes, but is not limited to, using or accessing a service.
3. "Deprive." To "deprive" another of property means (a) to withhold it or cause it to be withheld from him or her permanently or for so extended a period or under such circumstances that the major portion of its economic value or benefit is lost to him or her, or (b) to dispose of the property in such manner or under such circumstances as to render
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD03876-03-7
S. 2406--A 2
it unlikely that an owner will recover such property. When the property is personal identifying information, computer data or computer program, to deprive another of its means to obtain it or cause a third person to obtain it under such circumstances that a substantial portion of the economic benefit or value of having control over it or authority over its use is lost to an owner. To deprive another of service is to use or access a service or cause a third person to use or access a service under such circumstances that some of the economic benefit or value of having control or authority over providing the service is lost to an owner.
4. "Appropriate." To "appropriate" property of another to oneself or a third person means (a) to exercise control over it, or to aid a third person to exercise control over it, permanently or for so extended a period or under such circumstances as to acquire the major portion of its economic value or benefit, or (b) to dispose of the property for the benefit of oneself or a third person. When the property is personal identifying information, computer data or computer program of another, to appropriate it to oneself or a third person means to obtain it under such circumstances as to acquire the ability to use it or dispose of it to the economic benefit of oneself or a third person or to the economic detriment or damage of an owner. To appropriate a service provided by another to oneself or a third person means to use or access the service under such circumstances as to acquire the ability to use it to the economic benefit of oneself or a third person or to the economic detriment or damage of an owner.
10. "Computer program" means an ordered set of data representing coded instructions or statements that when executed by the computer, cause the computer to process data or direct the computer to perform one or more computer operations or both and may be in any form, including magnetic storage media, optical media, computing devices, punched cards, or stored internally in the memory of the computer.
11. "Computer data" means a representation of information, knowledge, facts, concept or instructions which are being processed, or have been processed in a computer and may be in any form including magnetic storage media, punched cards, or stored internally in the memory of the computer.
§ 2. Paragraph (c) of subdivision 2 of section 155.05 of the penal law is amended and a new paragraph (f) is added to read as follows:
(c) By committing the crime of issuing a bad check, as defined in section 190.05, or by obtaining property or service by using or presenting a form of payment or personal identifying information the actor knows he or she is not authorized to use or knows is expired or forged or otherwise not valid;
(f) By theft of service. Theft of service means either: (i) using or accessing a service in a manner that otherwise requires payment and intentionally failing to pay for such use or access by either tampering without authority with a delivery, payment, or measurement device or mechanism, or by entering or leaving premises where the service is provided by stealth or by evading a physical barrier, or (ii) using or accessing a service in a manner that otherwise requires payment or the presentation of personal identifying information and using or presenting a form of payment or personal identifying information the actor knows he or she is not authorized to use or knows is expired or forged or otherwise not valid.
§ 3. Subdivision 1 of section 155.20 of the penal law is amended to read as follows:
S. 2406--A 3
1. Except as otherwise specified in this section, value means the market value of the property at the time and place of the crime, or if such cannot be satisfactorily ascertained, the cost of replacement of the property within a reasonable time after the crime. With regard to service, value shall also mean the cost of providing the service at the time of the crime, and with regard to the value of computer data or computer program value shall mean the replacement cost or the market value at the time and place of the crime, or the cost to write or develop such data and/or program, whichever is greater.
§ 4. The penal law is amended by adding a new section 155.23 to read as follows: § 155.23 Petit theft of service.
A person is guilty of petit theft of service when he or she steals a service.
Petit theft of service is a class B misdemeanor.
§ 5. Section 155.25 of the penal law is amended to read as follows: § 155.25 Petit larceny.
A person is guilty of petit larceny when he or she steals property, or steals a service and the value of the service exceeds five hundred dollars.
Petit larceny is a class A misdemeanor.
§ 6. The opening paragraph and subdivisions 1, 4 and 6 of section 155.30 of the penal law, the opening paragraph and subdivisions 1 and 6 as amended by chapter 515 of the laws of 1986, subdivision 4 as amended by chapter 556 of the laws of 1987, are amended to read as follows:
A person is guilty of grand larceny in the fourth degree when he or she steals property or a service and when:
1. The value of the property or service exceeds one thousand dollars; or
4. The property consists of a credit card or debit card or personal identifying information; or
6. The property or service, regardless of its nature and value, is obtained by extortion; or
§ 7. Section 155.35 of the penal law, as amended by chapter 464 of the laws of 2010, is amended to read as follows: § 155.35 Grand larceny in the third degree.
A person is guilty of grand larceny in the third degree when he or she steals property or a service and:
1. when the value of the property exceeds three thousand dollars, or
2. the property is an automated teller machine or the contents of an automated teller machine, or
3. the property is personal identifying information of twenty-five or more persons.
Grand larceny in the third degree is a class D felony.
§ 8. Section 155.40 of the penal law, as amended by chapter 515 of the laws of 1986, is amended to read as follows: § 155.40 Grand larceny in the second degree.
A person is guilty of grand larceny in the second degree when he or she steals property or a service and when:
1. The value of the property or service exceeds fifty thousand dollars; or
2. The property or service, regardless of its nature and value, is obtained by extortion committed by instilling in the victim a fear that the actor or another person will (a) cause physical injury to some person in the future, or (b) cause damage to property, or (c) use or abuse his or her position as a public servant by engaging in conduct
S. 2406--A 4
within or related to his or her official duties, or by failing or refusing to perform an official duty, in such manner as to affect some person adversely, or
3. the property is personal identifying information of one hundred or more persons.
Grand larceny in the second degree is a class C felony.
§ 9. Section 155.42 of the penal law, as added by chapter 515 of the laws of 1986, is amended to read as follows: § 155.42 Grand larceny in the first degree.
A person is guilty of grand larceny in the first degree when he or she steals property or a service and when the value of the property or service exceeds one million dollars; or the property is personal identifying information of one thousand or more persons.
Grand larceny in the first degree is a class B felony.
§ 10. Subdivisions 5 and 8 of section 156.00 of the penal law, subdivision 5 as amended and subdivision 8 as added by chapter 558 of the laws of 2006, are amended to read as follows:
5. "Computer material" is property and means any computer data or computer program which:
(a) contains records of the medical history or medical treatment of an identified or readily identifiable individual or individuals. This term shall not apply to the gaining access to or duplication solely of the medical history or medical treatment records of a person by that person or by another specifically authorized by the person whose records are gained access to or duplicated; or
(b) contains records maintained by the state or any political subdivision thereof or any governmental instrumentality within the state which contains any information concerning a person, as defined in subdivision seven of section 10.00 of this chapter, which because of name, number, symbol, mark or other identifier, can be used to identify the person and which is otherwise prohibited by law from being disclosed. This term shall not apply to the gaining access to or duplication solely of records of a person by that person or by another specifically authorized by the person whose records are gained access to or duplicated; or
(c) is not and is not intended to be available to anyone other than the person or persons rightfully in possession thereof or selected persons having access thereto with his, her or their consent and which [accords or may accord such rightful possessors an advantage over competitors or other persons who do not have knowledge or the benefit thereof] any person, other than a person rightfully in possession, knows or should know is not intended to be available to him or her.
8. "Without authorization" means to use or to access a computer, computer service or computer network without the permission of the owner or lessor or someone licensed or privileged by the owner or lessor where such person knew that his or her use or access was without permission or after actual notice to such person that such use or access was without permission, or that such use or access was for purposes other than those for which permission was granted by the owner, lessor, or someone licensed or privileged by such owner or lessor. It shall also mean the access of a computer service by a person without permission where such person knew that such access was without permission or after actual notice to such person, that such access was without permission.
Proof that such person used or accessed a computer, computer service or computer network through the knowing use of a set of instructions, code or computer program that bypasses, defrauds or otherwise circumvents a security measure installed or used with the user's authorization
S. 2406--A 5
on the computer, computer service or computer network shall be presumptive evidence that such person used or accessed such computer, computer service or computer network without authorization.
§ 11. Section 156.20 of the penal law, as amended by chapter 558 of the laws of 2006, is amended to read as follows: § 156.20 Computer tampering in the [fourth] fifth degree.
A person is guilty of computer tampering in the [fourth] fifth degree when he or she uses, causes to be used, or accesses a computer, computer service, or computer network without authorization and he or she intentionally alters in any manner or destroys computer data or a computer program of another person.
Computer tampering in the [fourth] fifth degree is a class A misdemeanor.
§ 12. Section 156.25 of the penal law, as amended by chapter 89 of the laws of 1993, subdivision 2 as amended by chapter 376 of the laws of 1997, is amended to read as follows: § 156.25 Computer tampering in the [third] fourth degree.
A person is guilty of computer tampering in the third degree when he or she commits the crime of computer tampering in the [fourth] fifth degree and:
1. he or she does so with an intent to commit or attempt to commit or further the commission of any felony; or
2. he or she has been previously convicted of any crime under this article or subdivision eleven of section 165.15 of this chapter; or
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the penal law and the criminal procedure law, in relation to cyber crimes; and to repeal certain provisions of the penal law relating to scheme to defraud
Purpose
To create a framework for the prosecution of online privacy violations.
Summary of provisions
The bill modernizes, or if necessary, creates cyber-crime statutes and creates a graduated series of penalties based on the amount of damages and the numbers of persons affected.
Read the full memo (2,033 words)
Larceny
Amends section 155.00 of the penal law to enlarge the definition of "property" to include personal identifying information and secret scientific material, to update definitions of "obtain," "deprive," "appropriate" for the computer age, and to add definitions of "computer program" and "computer data" Extends definition of larceny to include personal identifying information and theft of service. Changes definition of larceny to include theft of service and changes penalty structure to match the penalty to the numbers of people or the amount of damages, as follows:
*Creates a new crime, Petit Theft of Service (155.23), stealing a service, a B misdemeanor.
*Adds to Petit larceny (155.25), stealing a service with a value in excess of $500.
*Adds to Grand larceny 4th (155.30) stealing a service or personal identifying information maintains $1,000 value - E felony.
*Adds to Grand larceny 3rd (155.35), stealing a service, or that the property stolen is personal identifying information of 25 or more persons; maintains $3,000 value - D felony.
*Adds to Grand larceny 2nd, personal identifying information of 100 or more persons maintains $50,000 limit - C felony.
*Adds to Grand larceny 1st, personal identifying information of 1,000 or more persons maintains $1 million valuation - B felony.
Computer tampering
Changes definition of without authorization in computer use to include going beyond the scope of permission granted Renumbers computer tampering to include a new computer tampering in the first degree by renumbering fourth, third, and second degrees one step lower The new computer tampering framework is as follows:
*Computer tampering 5th degree (formerly the 4th) - remains a class A misdemeanor.
*Computer tampering 4th degree - damages of $1,000 - remains an E felony.
*Computer tampering 3rd degree - damages of $3,000 - remains a D felony.
*Computer tampering 2nd degree - $50,000 - remains a C felony. *Computer Tampering 1st degree - $1 million in damages - B felony.
Denial of service attack
New crimes against denial of service defined as the transmission of a program, information, code, or command, or other electronic communication, and as a result of such conduct, intentionally makes the computer, computer service, computer program, or computer network temporarily or indefinitely unavailable to its intended users.
*Denial of Service Attack 5th - A misdemeanor.
*Denial of service attack 4th - damages or loss that exceeds $1,000 - E felony.
*Denial of service attack 3rd - damages or loss of $3,000 - D felony.
*Denial of service attack 2nd - damages or loss that exceeds $50,000 - C felony.
*Denial of service attack 1st - damages or loss that exceeds $1 million- B felony
Criminal possession of stolen property
Adds personally identifying information to the definition of stolen property, and creates a new framework:
*Criminal possession of stolen property 4th - adds personal identifying information.
*Criminal possession of stolen property 3rd - value exceeds $3,000 or 25 or more victims - D felony.
*Criminal possession of stolen property 2nd - value exceeds $50,000 or the consists of personal identifying information of one hundred or more persons - C felony. *Criminal possession of stolen property 1st - value exceeds $1 million or the consists of personal identifying information of one thousand or more persons - B felony.
Scheme to defraud
Creates graduated scheme to defraud:
*Scheme to Defraud 5th - No specified value or number of victims - A Misdemeanor.
*Scheme to Defraud 4th - Greater than $1,000 or 10 or more victims or one vulnerable elderly person - E Felony.
*Scheme to Defraud 3rd - Greater than $3,000 or 25 or more victims - D Felony.
*Scheme to Defraud 2nd - Greater than $50,000 or 100 or more victims - C Felony.
*Scheme to Defraud 1st - Greater than $1,000,000 or 1,000 or more victims - B Felony.
Identify theft
Renumbers current sections to Create a graduated provision in place of the level penalty that currently exists:
*Identity Theft 5th - No specified value or number of victims - A Misdemeanor. *Identity Theft 4th - Greater than $500 or 3 or more victims - E Felony.
*Identity Theft 3rd - Greater than $2,000 or 10 or more victims - D Felony.
*Identity Theft 2nd - Greater than $25,000 or 25 or more victims C Felony
*Identity Theft 1st - Greater than $500,000 or 100 or more victims - B Felony.
*Aggravated identity theft - includes vulnerable elderly person or a physically disabled person in an aggregate amount that exceeds five hundred dollars - D felony.
Skimmer device
*Criminal possession of a skimmer device 2nd - D Felony.
*Criminal possession of a skimmer device 1st - C Felony.
Venue & search warrants
*Adds to CPL Geographical jurisdiction of offenses an offense of larceny, criminal possession of stolen property, and personal identifying information or computer data or computer program.
*CPL Search warrants - adds electronic communication service or remote computing service, defines "Electronic Communications services" and adds any company, corporation or entity which is headquartered or located outside of the State of New York, and which conducts its regular business in New York or that offers its services to residents of New York.
Allows district attorney offices to conduct search warrants properly issued by a court of competent jurisdiction relating to electronic data and information.
Clarifies that a court of competent jurisdiction under the U.S. code shall be authorized to issue search warrants regarding electronic or digital information.
Existing law
New bill.
Justification
Cybercrime and identity theft are the fastest growing crimes in New York and around the country, with almost daily reports of breaches of customer information from large and small institutions. New York's criminal laws have not kept pace with technology, and do not reflect new modes of communication, or the ways companies conduct their businesses, or provide adequate punishment for the serious damage suffered by victims of cybercrimes and identity thefts. This legislation modernizes the criminal laws, provides new tools for law enforcement, and creates an appropriate graduated scheme for prosecutions:
1. Identity Theft and Related Statutes -
a. Increase Identity Theft Penalties to Reflect the Severity of the Crime. The most severe criminal statute that penalizes identity theft is Penal Law 190.80 (Identity Theft in the First Degree), which provides, in relevant part, that one who engages in identity theft that causes more than $2,000 in losses is guilty of a Class D felony (See Penal Law § 190.80(2)), but the statute does not distinguish between more and less severe instances of identity theft, meaning that theft that causes $2,001 in losses faces the same charge as theft that causes losses of $500,000, or more. Similarly, stealing numerous victims may be subject to no greater penalty than stealing the identity of a single person
b. Repeat Offenders. The bill extends the lookback period from five years to 10 years, similar to Persistent Sexual Abuse, Vehicular Assault in the First Degree, Menacing in the First Degree, and others It also provides a tolling provision that "stops the clock" during the time a defendant is incarcerated. Finally, it includes a prior conviction for any larceny crime in Article 155, any criminal possession of stolen property crime in Article 165, and any offense listed in Articles 170 ("Other Frauds") and 190 ("Forgery or Related Offenses") as a qualifying predicate offense for "bump up."
c. Aggravated Identity Theft-In 2007, the legislature created Aggravated Identity Theft (Penal Law § 190.80-a), which makes it a Class D felony to engage in identity theft and thereby cause gain or loss of $500 or more, while knowing that the person whose identity is stolen is a member of the armed forces serving overseas. The bill includes other vulnerable groups, the elderly, the incompetent, and the physically disabled in the ambit of the law.
2. Criminal Possession of a Skimmer Device
A "skimmer device" is defined as a "device designed or adapted to obtain person identifying information from a credit card, debit card, public benefit card, access card or device, or other card or device that contains personal identifying information." Skimmer devices are essential in almost all cybercrime, identity theft, and forgery-related crimes. Because of skimmer devices' central importance to such crimes, the penalties for unlawful possession of skimmer devices should be increased.
3. Computer Crimes
a. Definition of "Computer Material." The current definition is restricted to medical records, government records, or data that provides a competitive advantage to the individual accessing it without permission As a consequence, computer trespass, duplication, or tampering that affect other kinds of computer data - such as personal, non-commercial information that may be equally dear to the rightful owners of such data - cannot be effectively prosecuted. For example, hacking into private citizens' emails may be prosecuted as only a misdemeanor rather than a felony. The definition of "computer material" is broadened so that Computer Trespass, Unlawful Duplication of Computer Related Material in the Second Degree, and Computer Tampering in the Second and Third Degrees may be charged even where the material trespassed, duplicated, or tampered with is not medical or government records or competitively sensitive data. The measure also clarifies "Without Authorization" to include exceeding limited access to engage in wrongdoing.
b. Computer Tampering - The highest level of computer tampering, which is the alteration or destruction of any of the data or programs on a computer by one whose use of or access to the computer is without authorization, is Computer Tampering in the First Degree, a C felony, which applies in any instance in which one engaged computer tampering and thereby causes damages exceeding $50,000. This does not meaningfully distinguish between more and less severe instances of computer tampering, and it provides an insufficient penalty for very serious instances of computer tampering, the change is to create a
graduated set of penalties based on damages or the numbers of people affected.
c. Scheme to Defraud- The crime is only a Class E felony, regardless of the value of property obtained. A defendant who defrauds numerous victims may be subject to no greater penalty than a defendant who defrauds a single victim. The bill creates a graduated scheme to defraud
d. Larceny and Criminal Possession of Stolen Property - Larceny and stolen property laws largely apply only to circumstances surrounding the fraudulent and unauthorized use of personal identifying information, as opposed to the theft and possession of the personal identifying information itself. The bill expands larceny and criminal possession of stolen property laws to cover individuals who steal and possess personal identifying information and provides graduated offenses involving possession of stolen personal identifying information.
e. Venue - the bill changes the law so that the same venue provisions apply to larceny and criminal possession of stolen property as they relate to personal identifying information. Identity theft often crosses county, state, and even national borders.
f. Search Warrants - Under CPL Article 690 20(1), search warrants issued by New York courts cannot be executed outside of the State. As a consequence, it is difficult to execute search warrants for email content or social media accounts (many of which are based in California) In several other states search warrants issued by the state's courts may be executed outside of the state. The bill amends CPL to allow for the execution of search warrants for electronic records, email accounts, etc., outside New York State. It does not seek to permit the execution outside of the state of search warrants that seek non-electronic content.
Legislative history
2015 S. 4072 Passed Senate. 2016 S. 4072-B Passed Senate.
Fiscal implications
It is likely that this will result in increased penalty revenues.
Effective date
The first of November after it shall have become law.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.