What's happening
This bill gives preference and sets deadlines for appeals in court cases regarding denials of exceptions to public disclosure under New York law.
Why it matters
Speeds up the appeals process. for cases where someone is contesting a denial of an exception to public disclosure, ensuring these disputes are resolved faster and with greater judicial attention.
Establishes strict deadlines. for both trial and appellate courts (e.g., arguments must be scheduled within 45 days, records and briefs must be filed within 60 days or the appeal is abandoned), reducing the chances of lengthy delays that could leave records in limbo and impact access to public information.
Prioritizes transparency and accountability. by making it harder for parties to use procedural delays to block the release of information, which could be critical for journalists, watchdog groups, and the public seeking timely access to government records.
Aligns these cases with other high-priority legal matters. (like certain family law appeals), signaling that disputes over public access to information are of significant public interest and deserve expedited treatment in the courts.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Speed Up Appeals on FOIL
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
1 Co-sponsor
History
- Referred to investigations and government operations
- Referred to investigations and government operations
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Speed Up Disclosure Appeals
In Senate Committee · Rules · Sponsor Amy Paulin
Full text
2 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
2817
2017-2018 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
January 17, 2017
Introduced by Sen. LANZA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Government Operations
AN ACT to amend the public officers law and the civil practice law and rules, in relation to preference given to an appeal to the appellate division of the supreme court regarding a denial of an exception from disclosure
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Paragraph (d) of subdivision 5 of section 89 of the public officers law, as amended by chapter 339 of the laws of 2004, is amended to read as follows:
(d) (i) A proceeding to review an adverse determination pursuant to paragraph (c) of this subdivision may be commenced pursuant to article seventy-eight of the civil practice law and rules. Such proceeding, when brought by a person seeking an exception from disclosure pursuant to this subdivision, must be commenced within fifteen days of the service of the written notice containing the adverse determination provided for in subparagraph two of paragraph (c) of this subdivision. The proceeding shall be given preference and shall be brought on for argument on such terms and conditions as the presiding justice may direct, not to exceed forty-five days.
(ii) Appeal to the appellate division of the supreme court must be made in accordance with subdivision (a) of section fifty-five hundred thirteen of the civil practice law and rules.
(iii) An appeal taken from an order of the court requiring disclosure:
(A) shall be given preference; and
(B) shall be brought on for argument on such terms and conditions as the presiding justice may direct, upon application by any party to the proceeding; and
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD06642-01-7
S. 2817 2
(C) shall be deemed abandoned when the party requesting an exclusion from disclosure fails to serve and file a record and brief within sixty days after the date of the notice of appeal, unless consent of further extension is given by all parties, or unless further extension is granted by the court upon such terms as may be just and upon good cause shown.
§ 2. Subdivision (b) of rule 5521 of the civil practice law and rules, as amended by chapter 487 of the laws of 2016, is amended to read as follows:
(b) Consistent with the provisions of section one thousand one hundred twelve of the family court act, appeals from orders, judgments or decrees in proceedings brought pursuant to articles three, seven, ten and ten-A and parts one and two of article six of the family court act, and pursuant to sections three hundred fifty-eight-a, three hundred eighty-three-c, three hundred eighty-four, and three hundred eightyfour-b of the social services law, and pursuant to paragraph (d) of subdivision four and subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (d) of subdivision five of section eighty-nine of the public officers law, shall be given preference and may be brought on for argument on such terms and conditions as the court may direct without the necessity of a motion.
§ 3. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it shall have become a law; provided, however, that if chapter 487 of the laws of 2016 shall not have taken effect on or before such date then section two of this act shall take effect on the same date and in the same manner as such chapter of the laws of 2016 takes effect.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Purpose
To require that a proceeding to stop disclosure of a record be given. preference by the courts and heard in an expedited manner.
Summary of specific provisions
Section one amends subdivision five of section eighty-nine of the public officers law to provide that a proceeding commenced to review an adverse determination pursuant to paragraph (c) of section eighty-nine shall be given preference and shall be brought on for argument on such terms and conditions as the presiding justice may direct, not to exceed forty-five days.
This section also provides that an appeal to the appellate division of the supreme court must be made in accordance with subdivision (a) of section fifty- five hundred thirteen of the civil practice law and rules. An appeal taken from an order of the court requiring disclosure shall be given preference and shall be brought on for argument on such terms and conditions as the presiding justice may direct, upon applica- tion by any party to the proceeding. This action shall be deemed aban- doned when the party requesting an exclusion from disclosure fails to serve and file a record and brief within sixty days after the date of the notice of appeal, unless consent of further extension is given by all parties, or unless further extension is granted by the court upon such terms as may be just and upon good cause shown.
Second two amends subdivision b of rule 5521 of the civil practice law and rules to give reference to a proceeding to review an adverse deter- mination, pursuant to paragraph (d) of subdivision five of section eighty nine of the public officers law.
Section three provides the effective date.
Justification
Subdivision five of section eighty-nine of the Freedom of Information Law relates to disclosures that would cause substantial injury to the competitive. position of a commercial enterprise. This is the only grounds upon which a person or entity may initiate a judicial proceeding to prevent the government from disclosing records to the public. The government will then be required to expend time and money to defend its position that the record should be disclosed, a cost which is passed along to taxpayers.
Unlike proceedings initiated by individuals who have been denied access to requested records, this is a situation in which a person or entity is seeking to block records from being released when the agency believes the records must be disclosed. Often, commercial enterprises initiate these proceedings to cause delays and prevent the release of records that could affect a business deal or other action. Ensuring that these proceedings are brought on for argument in an expedited manner will prevent the use of these challenges as a delay tactic.
Legislative history
2017: S.2617 - Referred to Investigations & Government Operations / A.2878 - Referred to Codes 2016: S.3390 - Investigations & Government Operations/ A.327 - Govern- mental Operations. 2015: S.3390 - Investigations & Government Operations / A.327-Governmental Operations. 2014: S.7570 - Investigations & Government Operations / A.2057 - Reported to Codes
Fiscal implications
None.
Effective date
This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it shall have become a law; provided however, that if chapter 487 of the laws of 2016 shall not have taken effect on or before such date then section two of this act shall take effect on the same date and in the same manner as such chapter of the laws of 2016 takes effect.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.