What's happening
This bill replaces the term "visitation" with "parenting time" for parents in New York family law, to reduce negative connotations.
Why it matters
Language matters for parental dignity and public perception. By shifting from "visitation" (often associated with prisoners or outsiders) to "parenting time," the law acknowledges the ongoing parental role of non-custodial parents, affirming their significance in their children's lives and potentially reducing stigma.
Clarifies legal rights for non-parent relatives. The bill distinguishes "visitation" (for non-parents like grandparents, siblings, and step-parents) from "parenting time" (for parents), which could clarify court orders, reduce confusion, and ensure the rights of different parties are more clearly defined and respected.
May influence custody negotiations and court outcomes. The change in terminology could have practical effects on how courts, lawyers, and families frame and negotiate custody and parenting time arrangements, potentially encouraging more cooperative, shared parenting approaches rather than adversarial, winner-loser outcomes.
Reflects evolving views on family structure and child well-being. This modernization of legal language aligns with contemporary understanding that ongoing, meaningful relationships with both parents are generally in the best interests of children, and it may signal to judges and other stakeholders a more progressive, child-centered approach to family law.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Rename Visitation as Parenting Time
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
3 Co-sponsors
History
- Referred to judiciary
- Referred to judiciary
Full text
15 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
3594
2017-2018 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
January 25, 2017
Introduced by Sens. PARKER, BOYLE, LATIMER, MARCHIONE -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary
AN ACT to amend the domestic relations law and the family court act, in relation to changing the denotation of visitation to parenting time
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Legislative intent. The legislature hereby finds and declares that the term "visitation" carries a negative connotation with respect to noncustodial parents who want to be a part of their children's lives. Society has given the term "visitation" a negative connotation that can be associated with the visiting of an inmate at a correctional facility or prison. The purpose of this act is to reflect the fact that a parent's time with a child is not merely as a visitor but constitutes parenting time.
§ 1-a. Section 2 of the domestic relations law, as amended by chapter 920 of the laws of 1974, is amended to read as follows:
§ 2. Definitions. As used in this chapter:
1. A "minor" or "infant", [as used in this chapter,] is a person under the age of eighteen years.
2. "Visitation" refers to time permitted to be spent with a child pursuant to a court order under this chapter, the family court act or an order enforced under article five-A of this chapter, by a person who is not a parent of the child. This shall include grandparents, siblings and step-parents.
3. "Parenting time" refers to the period of time that a parent may spend with his or her child pursuant to a court order under this chapter, the family court act or an order enforced under article five-A of this chapter.
§ 2. Subdivision (b) of section 70 of the domestic relations law, as added by chapter 457 of the laws of 1988, is amended to read as follows:
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD07369-01-7
S. 3594 2
(b) Any order under this section which applies to rights of [visitation] parenting time with a child remanded or placed in the care of a person, official, agency or institution pursuant to article ten of the family court act or pursuant to an instrument approved under section three hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law, shall be enforceable pursuant to the provisions of part eight of article ten of [such] the family court act, sections three hundred fifty-eight-a and three hundred eighty-four-a of the social services law and other applicable provisions of law against any person or official having care and custody, or temporary care and custody, of such child.
§ 3. Subdivisions 3 and 4 of section 75-a of the domestic relations law, as added by chapter 386 of the laws of 2001, are amended to read as follows:
3. "Child custody determination" means a judgment, decree, or other order of a court providing for the legal custody, physical custody, or [visitation] parenting time with respect to a child. The term includes a permanent, temporary, initial, and modification order. The term does not include an order relating to child support or other monetary obligation of an individual.
4. "Child custody proceeding" means a proceeding in which legal custody, physical custody, [or] visitation or parenting time with respect to a child is an issue. The term includes a proceeding for divorce, separation, neglect, abuse, dependency, guardianship, paternity, termination of parental rights, and protection from domestic violence, in which the issue may appear. The term does not include a proceeding involving juvenile delinquency, person in need of supervision, contractual emancipation, or enforcement under title three of this article.
§ 4. Subdivision 1 of section 235 of the domestic relations law, as amended by chapter 122 of the laws of 1979, is amended to read as follows:
1. An officer of the court with whom the proceedings in a matrimonial action or a written agreement of separation or an action or proceeding for custody, [visitation] parenting time or maintenance of a child are filed, or before whom the testimony is taken, or his clerk, either before or after the termination of the suit, shall not permit a copy of any of the pleadings, affidavits, findings of fact, conclusions of law, judgment of dissolution, written agreement of separation or memorandum thereof, or testimony, or any examination or perusal thereof, to be taken by any other person than a party, or the attorney or counsel of a party, except by order of the court.
§ 5. Subdivision (b) of section 237 of the domestic relations law, as amended by chapter 329 of the laws of 2010, is amended to read as follows:
(b) Upon any application to enforce, annul or modify an order or judgment for alimony, maintenance, distributive award, distribution of marital property or for custody, [visitation,] parenting time or maintenance of a child, made as in section two hundred thirty-six or section two hundred forty of this article provided, or upon any application by writ of habeas corpus or by petition and order to show cause concerning custody, [visitation] parenting time or maintenance of a child, the court may direct a spouse or parent to pay counsel fees and fees and expenses of experts directly to the attorney of the other spouse or parent to enable the other party to carry on or defend the application or proceeding by the other spouse or parent as, in the court's discretion, justice requires, having regard to the circumstances of the case and of the respective parties. There shall be a rebuttable presump-
S. 3594 3
tion that counsel fees shall be awarded to the less monied spouse. In exercising the court's discretion, the court shall seek to assure that each party shall be adequately represented and that where fees and expenses are to be awarded, they shall be awarded on a timely basis, pendente lite, so as to enable adequate representation from the commencement of the proceeding. Applications for the award of fees and expenses may be made at any time or times prior to final judgment. Both parties to the action or proceeding and their respective attorneys, shall file an affidavit with the court detailing the financial agreement, between the party and the attorney. Such affidavit shall include the amount of any retainer, the amounts paid and still owing thereunder, the hourly amount charged by the attorney, the amounts paid, or to be paid, any experts, and any additional costs, disbursements or expenses. Any applications for fees and expenses may be maintained by the attorney for either spouse in counsel's own name in the same proceeding. Payment of any retainer fees to the attorney for the petitioning party shall not preclude any awards of fees and expenses to an applicant which would otherwise be allowed under this section.
§ 6. Paragraphs (a) and (a-1) of subdivision 1 of section 240 of the domestic relations law, paragraph (a) as amended by chapter 567 of the laws of 2015 and paragraph (a-1) as amended by chapter 295 of the laws of 2009, are amended to read as follows:
(a) In any action or proceeding brought (1) to annul a marriage or to declare the nullity of a void marriage, or (2) for a separation, or (3) for a divorce, or (4) to obtain, by a writ of habeas corpus or by petition and order to show cause, the custody of or right to [visitation] parenting time with any child of a marriage, the court shall require verification of the status of any child of the marriage with respect to such child's custody and support, including any prior orders, and shall enter orders for custody and support as, in the court's discretion, justice requires, having regard to the circumstances of the case and of the respective parties and to the best interests of the child and subject to the provisions of subdivision one-c of this section. Where either party to an action concerning custody of or a right to [visitation] parenting time with a child alleges in a sworn petition or complaint or sworn answer, cross-petition, counterclaim or other sworn responsive pleading that the other party has committed an act of domestic violence against the party making the allegation or a family or household member of either party, as such family or household member is defined in article eight of the family court act, and such allegations are proven by a preponderance of the evidence, the court must consider the effect of such domestic violence upon the best interests of the child, together with such other facts and circumstances as the court deems relevant in making a direction pursuant to this section and state on the record how such findings, facts and circumstances factored into the direction. If a parent makes a good faith allegation based on a reasonable belief supported by facts that the child is the victim of child abuse, child neglect, or the effects of domestic violence, and if that parent acts lawfully and in good faith in response to that reasonable belief to protect the child or seek treatment for the child, then that parent shall not be deprived of custody, [visitation] parenting time or contact with the child, or restricted in custody, [visitation] parenting time or contact, based solely on that belief or the reasonable actions taken based on that belief. If an allegation that a child is abused is supported by a preponderance of the evidence, then the court shall consider such evidence of abuse in determining the [visitation
S. 3594 4
arrangement] parenting time that is in the best interest of the child, and the court shall not place a child in the custody of a parent who presents a substantial risk of harm to that child, and shall state on the record how such findings were factored into the determination. Where a proceeding filed pursuant to article ten or ten-A of the family court act is pending at the same time as a proceeding brought in the supreme court involving the custody of, or right to [visitation] parenting time with, any child of a marriage, the court presiding over the proceeding under article ten or ten-A of the family court act may jointly hear the dispositional hearing on the petition under article ten or the permanency hearing under article ten-A of the family court act and, upon referral from the supreme court, the hearing to resolve the matter of custody or [visitation] parenting time in the proceeding pending in the supreme court; provided however, the court must determine custody or [visitation] parenting time in accordance with the terms of this section.
An order directing the payment of child support shall contain the social security numbers of the named parties. In all cases there shall be no prima facie right to the custody of the child in either parent. Such direction shall make provision for child support out of the property of either or both parents. The court shall make its award for child support pursuant to subdivision one-b of this section. Such direction may provide for reasonable visitation rights to the maternal and/or paternal grandparents of any child of the parties. Such direction as it applies to rights of [visitation] parenting time with a child remanded or placed in the care of a person, official, agency or institution pursuant to article ten of the family court act, or pursuant to an instrument approved under section three hundred fifty-eight-a of the social services law, shall be enforceable pursuant to part eight of article ten of the family court act and sections three hundred fiftyeight-a and three hundred eighty-four-a of the social services law and other applicable provisions of law against any person having care and custody, or temporary care and custody, of the child. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any written application or motion to the court for the establishment, modification or enforcement of a child support obligation for persons not in receipt of public assistance and care must contain either a request for child support enforcement services which would authorize the collection of the support obligation by the immediate issuance of an income execution for support enforcement as provided for by this chapter, completed in the manner specified in section one hundred eleven-g of the social services law; or a statement that the applicant has applied for or is in receipt of such services; or a statement that the applicant knows of the availability of such services, has declined them at this time and where support enforcement services pursuant to section one hundred eleven-g of the social services law have been declined that the applicant understands that an income deduction order may be issued pursuant to subdivision (c) of section fifty-two hundred forty-two of the civil practice law and rules without other child support enforcement services and that payment of an administrative fee may be required. The court shall provide a copy of any such request for child support enforcement services to the support collection unit of the appropriate social services district any time it directs payments to be made to such support collection unit. Additionally, the copy of any such request shall be accompanied by the name, address and social security number of the parties; the date and place of the parties' marriage; the name and date of birth of the child or children; and the name and address of the employers and income payors of the party
S. 3594 5
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the domestic relations law and the family court act, in relation to changing the denotation of visitation to parenting time
Purpose
This bill replaces the term "visitation" in relation to time spent with non-custodial parents with the term "parenting time" in the Domestic Relations Law and the Family Court Act.
Summary of provisions
Section 1 declares the legislative intent of the bill.
Section 1-a provides definitions for "visitation" and "parenting time."
Sections 2 through 13 amend various provisions of the Domestic Relations Law by changing references to "visitation" to "parenting time."
Sections 14 through 29 amend various provisions of the Family Court Act by changing references to "visitation" to "parenting time."
Section 30 amends the Family Court Act by adding definitions for "visitation" and "parenting time."
Section 31 This act shall take effect immediately, with provisions.
Justification
In 2006, the Judiciary's Matrimonial Commission, chaired by the Honorable Sondra Miller, recommended replacing the term "visitation" with "Parenting time" in appropriate law. This is meant to reflect a "cultural change" away from viewing time spent with a parent as "visitation" and instead as meaningful time spent with a parent. Children "visit" the zoo, or the dentist, or the park; they do not "visit" their mother or father. In addition, "visitation" is often associated with the visiting of inmates at correctional facilities and prisons, an inappropriate association for the time spent by a parent with his or her child. New York State law should reflect this reality.
The misuse of "visitation" to describe time spent by a parent with his or her child has implications far beyond legal court documents. Negative Perceptions of this time caused by visitation's "inappropriately pejorative meaning," in the words of the Honorable A. Gail Prudenti, can harm relations between a child and his or her non-custodial parent post-divorce. The inherent harmfulness of the phrase can also contribute to acrimony in divorce cases. "Parenting time," unlike "visitation," accurately reflects how meaningful and important time with both parents is in the life of a child. Many other states, including Oregon, New Jersey, and Michigan, have already instituted such a change in terminology. The inclusion of "parenting time" in New York law will follow the national trend to improve post-divorce relations among all parties.
Legislative history
2015-16: S.2760A/A.6407A - Amend and Recommit to Children and Families 2013-14: S.892A - Amend and Recommit to Judiciary 2011-12: S.7807 - Referred to Rules 2007-08: S.1074 (Saland) - Referred to Social Services, Children and Families
2005-06: S.468 (Saland) - Referred to Social Services, Children and Families 2003-04: S.1916 (Saland) - Passed Senate 2001-02: S.4893A (Saland) - Passed Senate 1999-2000: S.2720 (Saland) - Referred to Children and Families 1997-98: S.4519B (Saland) - Passed Senate
Fiscal implications
None to the state.
Effective date
The act shall take effect immediately, provided that the amendments to subdivision (a) of section 439 of the. Family Court Act made by section fifteen of this act shall be subject to the expiration and reversion of such subdivision pursuant to section 246 of Chapter 81 of the laws of 1995, as amended, when upon such date the provisions of section sixteen of this act shall take effect.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.