What's happening
This bill prohibits employers in New York from seeking salary history from job applicants to combat wage discrimination.
Why it matters
Targets the root of wage discrimination. By banning employers from asking about prior salary, the bill aims to break the cycle where past pay inequities follow workers—especially women and minorities—throughout their careers, thus perpetuating lower wages.
Empowers job seekers in negotiations. The bill allows applicants to voluntarily disclose salary history if they believe it benefits them (e.g., to negotiate a higher starting salary), shifting leverage in pay discussions toward the applicant rather than the employer.
Introduces accountability and transparency. The law requires employers to obtain written authorization to verify salary history and to keep proof, making it easier to enforce and investigate complaints about violations.
Promotes public awareness and enforcement. Mandates a public campaign to inform both employers and employees about the new rules and requires annual reporting of complaint data, increasing both compliance and visibility of wage discrimination issues.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Ban Salary History Questions
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
2 Co-sponsors
History
- Referred to investigations and government operations
- Referred to investigations and government operations
Full text
3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
5532
2017-2018 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
April 6, 2017
Introduced by Sens. ALCANTARA, CARLUCCI -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Investigations and Government Operations
AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to prohibiting employers from seeking salary history from prospective employees
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Legislative intent. The legislature hereby finds that New York should lead the nation in preventing wage discrimination.
The wage gap between men and women is one of the oldest and most persistent effects of inequality between the sexes in the United States.
The 1963 Equal Pay Act and the 1964 Civil Rights Act in the United States established the legal right to equal pay for equal work and equal opportunity. Yet half a century later, women are still subjected to wage gaps and paid less then men.
The concept of comparable worth attacks the problem of gender-based wage discrimination by mandating that jobs characterized by similar levels of education, skill, effort, responsibilities, and working conditions be compensated at similar wage levels regardless of the gender of the worker holding the job.
The goal of pay equity is to raise the wages for undervalued jobs held predominantly by women. Today, women make only 77 cents per every dollar earned by a man for a comparable job, a gender wage gap of 23 percent.
This translates into thousands of dollars of lost wages each year for each female worker, money that helps them feed their families, save for a college education and afford decent and safe housing.
Pay disparities affect women of all ages, races, and education levels, but are more pronounced for women of color. Minority women make as little as 54 cents per dollar for a comparable job held by a man.
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD05679-04-7
S. 5532 2
Female-dominated jobs pay twenty to thirty percent less than male-dominated jobs classified as comparable in worth and more than one half of all women work in jobs that are over seventy percent female.
Women are more likely to enter poverty in old age for several reasons: A lifetime of lower wages means women have less income to save for retirement, and less income that counts in their Social Security or pension benefit formula.
The current life expectancy for women means they will, on an average of three years, outlive men. Yet they will have to stretch their retirement savings, which are less to begin with, over a longer period of time.
The existence of pay inequity is a manifestation of deep-seated sex discrimination that prevents both equality of pay for women and equality of opportunity for both sexes.
More women in the United States are obtaining college degrees and increasing their participation in the labor force and family-friendly legislation, including the Equal Pay Act, Family and Medical Leave Act, and Pregnancy Discrimination Act, and policies such as flex time and telecommuting, have increased options to create a win-win situation for women and their employers.
Despite the progress, women continue to suffer the consequences of inequitable pay differentials: in 2010, the average college-educated woman working full-time earned $47,000 a year compared to $64,000 for a college-educated man.
During 2012, median weekly earnings for female full-time workers were $691, compared with $854 per week for men, a gender wage gap of 19 percent.
Fair pay strengthens the security of families and eases future retirement costs while also strengthening the American economy. In order to achieve fair pay, policymakers must enact laws that prevent gender based wage discrimination from when women enter the labor force.
In order to do so, it is necessary to prevent employers to base a woman's pay based on her previous pay history. Because the pay is already based on gender discrimination, allowing pay history to be requested by employers is equivalent to maintaining a standard of lower pay for women performing similar jobs as men. This practice of asking for pay history must be outlawed.
§ 2. Section 296 of the executive law is amended by adding a new subdivision 19-a to read as follows:
19-a. (a) It shall be an unlawful discriminatory practice of any employer, prospective employer, labor organization, employment agency or licensing agency, or employees or agents thereof, to seek a salary history from a prospective employee for an interview or as a condition for employment.
(b) An employee or prospective employee may provide a salary history only for the purposes of negotiating an advanced salary.
(c) A prospective employer may only confirm a salary history after obtaining written authorization by the prospective employee and such prospective employer must preserve proof of that authorization.
§ 3. The department of labor, in conjunction with the New York state division of human rights, shall (a) establish a public awareness campaign, available on their respective websites, informing employers in the state that it is illegal to seek salary information from prospective employees; and (b) collect complaints of violations of section two hundred ninety-six of the executive law through their toll free telephone number and provide data regarding the number of complaints and the
S. 5532 3
regions of the state where the complaints originate in an annual required reporting on labor and human rights law violations.
§ 4. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the executive law, in relation to prohibiting employers from seeking salary history from prospective employees
Purpose of bill
In order to achieve fair pay, policymakers must enact laws that prevent gender based wage discrimination from the point when women enter the labor force. Asking prospective employees for wage history as a requirement for a job interview or job application or as condition for accepting a job is a discriminatory practice that must be banned.
Summary of provisions of bill
Section 1 - Legislative Intent
Read the full memo (604 words)
Section 2 - Section 296 of the executive law is amended by adding a new subdivision 19-a to read as follows: It shall be unlawful discriminatory practice of any employer, labor organization, employment agency or licensing agency, or employees or agents thereof, to seek a salary history from a prospective employee for an interview or as a condition for employment; (b) a salary history may be provided by employee or prospective employee only to negotiate an advanced salary; (c) a prospective employer may only confirm a salary history after obtaining a written authorization by prospective employee and proof of that authorization must by preserved.
Justification
It is time to prohibit employers from seeking salary history from prospective employees.
This is a tactic used by employers to justify their lower pay rate and/or marginal pay increase for women employees. This practice is a root cause of continued wage gap and wage inequalities between female and male employees.
Banning this practice should be the first step in enforcing equal pay laws like those passed by the federal government almost 50 years ago. Without such a ban women start any new job having their salary based on previous salary, which to begin with was unequal to their male counterparts. It's a revolving cycle that brings us to today's persistent wage gap which ranges from 23% to as much as 45% for minority women!
The 1963 Equal Pay Act and the 1964 Civil Rights Act in the United States established the legal right /0 equal pay for equal work and equal opportunity. Yet half a century later, women are still subjected to wage gaps and paid less than men.
Despite progress, 2013 marks another year where women continue to suffer the consequences of inequitable pay differentials:
*In 2010, the average college-educated woman working full-time earned $47,000 a year compared to $64,000 for a college-educated man.
*In 2010, the average salary for a male with an Associate's degree was $50,000 while a woman with an Associate's degree earned $38,000.
*In 2010, the average salary for a male with a Master's degree was $81,000 while a woman with a Master's degree earned $59,000.
For Hispanic and Black women, the pay gap is even more extreme with pay as low as 56 cents for every dollar a man makes. This is the case for Latinas in the workforce and as low as 66 cents for every dollar a man makes for Black women.
In order to achieve fair pay, policymakers must enact laws that prevent gender based wage discrimination from the point when women enter the labor force. Asking prospective employees for wage history as a requirement for a job interview or job application or as condition for accepting a job is a discriminatory practice that must be banned.
Legislative history
New Bill; A6680 of 2013 died in Assembly Governmental Operations; A5982 of 2015/2016, died in Assembly Governmental Operations.
Fiscal implications
None.
Effective date
This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.