Skip to content
S5637Senate2017-2018 SessionSame asA5516

Penalize Meritless Lawsuits

Official title

“Relates to attorneys' fees and costs for meritless actions and abusive lawsuits”

Sponsor Marisol AlcantaraSD-31Affects Legal
Status
Stricken
Impact
6/10
Moderate
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Judiciary

What's happening

This bill requires courts to award attorneys' fees and costs for meritless or abusive lawsuits, with specified exemptions and fee limits.

Why it matters

  1. Creates a financial deterrent against filing meritless or abusive lawsuits. by requiring losing parties to pay reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs when their claims are dismissed for failing to state a valid cause of action—potentially reducing frivolous litigation and misuse of the courts.

  2. Includes important exemptions. to protect access to justice, such as for government actions, pro se litigants (except in cases of unreasonable behavior), good faith attempts to change or clarify the law, and cases where laws change after the claim was filed—aiming to avoid chilling legitimate or novel legal claims.

  3. Limits financial exposure for losing parties. by capping attorneys’ fee awards at $15,000 per lawsuit under the new section and increasing the cap to $25,000 per frivolous claim in personal injury and similar actions, striking a balance between discouraging abuse and avoiding excessive penalties.

  4. Ensures fee awards only after all appeals are exhausted. and clarifies that these provisions do not reduce other existing avenues for courts to impose sanctions or award fees, reinforcing the seriousness of dismissal but preserving judicial discretion and existing protections.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Penalize Meritless Lawsuits

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Marisol Alcantara

Senator · Senate District 31

Chair, Labor

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Recommit, enacting clause stricken
  2. Referred to judiciary

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A5516Assembly

Penalize Meritless Lawsuits

Stricken · Sponsor Luis R. Sepúlveda

Impact 6 · Moderate0% to pass

Full text

2 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

5637

2017-2018 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

April 24, 2017

Introduced by Sen. ALCANTARA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary

AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to attorneys' fees and costs for meritless actions and abusive lawsuits

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. The civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new section 8101-a to read as follows:

§ 8101-a. Attorneys' fees and costs for meritless actions and abusive actions. 1. Where a court grants a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted, the court shall award the party or parties against whom the dismissed claims were asserted reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in the proceeding as a consequence of the dismissed claims.

2. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the court shall not require a party to pay attorneys' fees and costs under this section in excess of fifteen thousand dollars in any single lawsuit.

3. This section shall not apply to:

a. actions by the state, other government entities, or public officials acting in their official capacity or under color of law;

b. any claim that is dismissed by the granting of a motion to dismiss that was filed more than sixty days after the moving party received service of the latest complaint, counter-complaint or cross-complaint in which that dismissed claim was made;

c. any claim that the party against whom the motion to dismiss was granted in good faith amended to state a claim upon which relief may be granted;

d. actions by pro se litigants, except where the court also finds that the pro se party acted unreasonably in bringing, or refusing to voluntarily withdraw, the dismissed claim;

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD09746-01-7

S. 5637 2

e. any claim which is a good faith, non-frivolous claim for the express purpose of extending, modifying, or reversing existing precedent, law or regulation, or for the express purpose of establishing the meaning, lawfulness or constitutionality of a law, regulation or constitutional right where the issue is a matter of first impression or subject to conflicting interpretations. This subdivision shall not apply when the party that asserted the dismissed claim specifically pleaded that the dismissed claim was made for one of the express purposes listed above and cited the contrary precedent or interpretation the party seeks to distinguish or overcome, or whether the issue to be decided is a matter of first impression or conflicting interpretations as described in this subdivision; or

f. any claim for which relief could be granted under a law, regulation, a court precedent that was in effect and applicable to the claim at the time the claim was filed; where that law, regulation, or precedent was cited in the pleading in which the dismissed claim was made or in the response to the motion to dismiss; and where court granted the motion to dismiss the claim due to the subsequent repeal, amendment, overruling, or distinguishing of that law, regulation, or court precedent.

4. An award pursuant to this section shall be made only after all appeals of the issue of the granting of the motion to dismiss have been exhausted and if the final outcome is the granting of the motion to dismiss.

5. Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit the award of attorneys' fees, costs, or sanctions authorized by other law.

§ 2. Subdivision (a) of section 8303-a of the civil practice law and rules, as amended by chapter 620 of the laws of 1997, is amended to read as follows:

(a) If in an action to recover damages for personal injury, injury to property or wrongful death, or an action brought by the individual who committed a crime against the victim of the crime, and such action or claim is commenced or continued by a plaintiff or a counterclaim, defense or cross claim is commenced or continued by a defendant and is found, at any time during the proceedings or upon judgment, to be frivolous by the court, the court shall award to [the successful] each prevailing party costs and reasonable attorney's fees not exceeding [ten] twenty-five thousand dollars for each frivolous claim, defense or cross claim.

§ 3. This act shall take effect immediately.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to attorneys' fees and costs for meritless actions and abusive lawsuits

Purpose or general idea of bill

Relates to attorney's fees and cost for meritless actions and abusive lawsuits

Summary of provisions

Section 1. Courts grant a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action upon which relief may be granted, the court shall award the party or parties against whom the dismissed claims were asserted reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in the proceeding as a consequence of the dismissed claims.

Read the full memo (723 words)

Section 2.The court shall not require a party to pay attorneys' fees and cost under this section in excess of fifteen thousand dollars in any single lawsuit

Section 3a.Does not apply to actions by the state, other government entities, or public officials acting in their official capacity or under color of law;

b. any claim that is dismissed by the granting of a motion to dismiss that was filed more than sixty days after the moving party received service of the latest complaint, counter-complaint or cross-complaint in which that dismissed claim was made;

c. Any claim that the party against whom the motion to dismiss was granted in good faith amended to state a claim upon relief may be granted;

d. actions by pro se litigants, except where the court also finds that the pro se party acted unreasonably in bringing, or refusing to voluntarily withdraw, the dismissed claim

e. any claim which is a good faith, non-frivolous claim for the express purpose of extending, modifying, or reversing existing precedent, law or regulation, or for the express purpose of establishing the meaning, lawfulness or constitutionality of a law, regulation or constitutional right where the issue is a matter of first impression or subject to conflicting interpretations.

Section 5a. if in an action to recover damages for personal injury, injury to property or wrongful death, or an action brought by the individual who committed a crime against the victim of the crime, and such action or claim is commenced or continued by a plaintiff or a counterclaim, defense or cross claim is commenced or continued by a defendant and is found, at any time during the proceedings or upon judgement, to be frivolous by the court, the court shall award to the successful each prevailing party costs and reasonable attorney's fees not exceeding 25,000 for each frivolous claim, defense or cross claim.

Difference between original and amended version

N/A

Justification

At this moment, it is extremely difficult to get a baseless lawsuit dismissed in New York. In 2014, singer Collette McLafferty was served with a lawsuit by a personal injury attorney representing himself. The lawsuit sought $10 million in damages. This attorney was the former drummer of a Pink cover band with which Ms. McLafferty had performed a single concert. She had never actually met him, but in his filing the lawyer accused Collette of hurting his image - apparently by being "too unattractive" and "a lousy singer." The lawsuit was filed in bad faith with the intended goal of harassing and bullying Ms. McLafferty. She spent nearly $15,000 in legal fees defending herself, a sum that forced her to give up her apartment of 10 years and move out of Manhattan. Most troubling, when all was said and done, the attorney faced no sanctions or reprimand from the court. After two years of litigation, the case was eventually settled and dismissed, but she was never fully reimbursed for the damage done. Collette's struggle was picked up by the media with tabloid headlines focused on the insulting language found in the court papers.

Lawsuits like this are a drag on our legal system and serve only to harass and extort a settlement from the defendant. The bill proposed here authorizes the imposition of monetary sanctions in any civil action or proceeding upon a written finding of the court that a party or attorney has brought a claim or employed procedures entirely without merit and in bad faith. The legislation aims to reimburse victims of lawsuit abuse as well as deter parties and attorneys from filing meritless claims.

Prior legislation history

New Bill

Fiscal implications

N/A

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.