Skip to content
S6456Senate2017-2018 SessionSame asA1501

Rochester Traffic Court Overhaul

Official title

“Relates to the adjudication of traffic infractions in the county of Monroe”

Sponsor Joseph E. RobachSD-56+1 co-sponsorAffects Legal
Status
Signed by Governor
Impact
6/10
Moderate
Outcome
Signed into law

Bill progress

Signed into law

What's happening

This bill creates the Rochester Traffic Violations Agency to handle certain traffic infractions in Rochester, transferring responsibilities from existing administrative tribunals.

Why it matters

  1. Creates a new, city-run agency for traffic infractions. The Rochester Traffic Violations Agency will centralize the administration and adjudication of most non-criminal traffic violations, potentially streamlining processes and making them more locally responsive. This could mean faster resolution and more consistent handling of minor traffic cases.

  2. Shifts prosecution and oversight away from state bodies. Traffic prosecutors and the agency’s executive director will be selected and overseen by city officials, not by the state. This change gives Rochester increased control over how traffic laws are enforced and allows prioritization based on local needs and policies.

  3. Defines clear limits on agency authority. The agency cannot handle serious offenses like DUIs, felonies, misdemeanors, or parking violations, which remain with other courts or agencies. This ensures only certain infractions are moved, helping maintain legal safeguards for more serious cases.

  4. Adjusts financial flows and employment protections. The bill modifies how fines and penalties are distributed between the city and state, potentially affecting city revenues. It also includes provisions to protect employees transferred from state to city employment, maintaining their civil service rights and career opportunities.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Rochester Traffic Court Overhaul

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Joseph E. Robach

Senator · Senate District 56

Chair, Transportation

1 Co-sponsor

History

  1. Signed chap.157
  2. Delivered to governor
  3. Returned to senate
  4. Passed assembly
  5. Home rule request
  6. Ordered to third reading rules cal.370
  7. Substituted for A1501B
  8. Referred to codes
  9. Delivered to assembly
  10. Passed senateVote 61–0
  11. Home rule request
  12. Ordered to third reading cal.1515
Show 4 earlier actions
  1. Reported and committed to rules
  2. Print number 6456a
  3. Amend and recommit to transportation
  4. Referred to transportation

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A1501Assembly

Monroe Traffic Ticket Reform

Assembly Floor Calendar · Sponsor David Gantt

Impact 6 · Moderate0% to pass

Full text

11 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

6456--A

2017-2018 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

May 22, 2017

Introduced by Sen. ROBACH -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Transportation -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee

AN ACT to amend the vehicle and traffic law, the general municipal law, the state finance law, and the criminal procedure law, in relation to the adjudication of traffic infractions

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Section 155 of the vehicle and traffic law, as amended by section 1 of part CC of chapter 58 of the laws of 2015, is amended to read as follows:

§ 155. Traffic infraction. The violation of any provision of this chapter, except articles forty-seven and forty-eight, or of any law, ordinance, order, rule or regulation regulating traffic which is not declared by this chapter or other law of this state to be a misdemeanor or a felony. A traffic infraction is not a crime and the punishment imposed therefor shall not be deemed for any purpose a penal or criminal punishment and shall not affect or impair the credibility as a witness or otherwise of any person convicted thereof. This definition shall be retroactive and shall apply to all acts and violations heretofore committed where such acts and violations would, if committed subsequent to the taking effect of this section, be included within the meaning of the term "traffic infraction" as herein defined. Except in those portions of Suffolk county for which a district court has been established, [outside of cities having a population in excess of two hundred thousand but less than two hundred twenty thousand in which administrative tribunals have heretofore been established and] outside of cities having a population in excess of one million in which administrative tribunals have heretofore been established, courts and judicial officers heretofore having jurisdiction over such violations shall continue to do

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD02052-05-7

S. 6456--A 2

so and for such purpose such violations shall be deemed misdemeanors and all provisions of law relating to misdemeanors except as provided in section eighteen hundred five of this chapter and except as herein otherwise expressly provided shall apply except that no jury trial shall be allowed for traffic infractions. In those portions of Suffolk county for which a district court has been established[, and in cities having a population in excess of two hundred thousand but less than two hundred twenty thousand in which administrative tribunals have heretofore been established] and in cities having a population in excess of one million in which administrative tribunals have heretofore been established, the criminal courts of such cities or portions of Suffolk county in which a district court has been established shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any complaint alleging a violation constituting a traffic infraction, except that administrative tribunals heretofore established in such cities or portions of Suffolk county in which a district court has been established shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any charge of an offense which is a traffic infraction, except parking, standing or stopping. In cities having a population in excess of two hundred thousand in which administrative tribunals have heretofore been established, and any such administrative tribunal established by the city of Yonkers, the city of Peekskill, or the city of Syracuse, such tribunals shall have jurisdiction to hear and determine any charge of an offense which is a parking, standing or stopping violation. Any fine imposed by an administrative tribunal shall be a civil penalty. For purposes of arrest without a warrant, pursuant to article one hundred forty of the criminal procedure law, a traffic infraction shall be deemed an offense.

§ 2. Subdivision 1 of section 225 of the vehicle and traffic law, as amended by section 2 of part CC of chapter 58 of the laws of 2015, is amended to read as follows:

1. Notwithstanding any inconsistent provision of law, all violations of this chapter or of a law, ordinance, order, rule or regulation relating to traffic, except parking, standing, stopping or pedestrian offenses, which occur [within a city having a population of two hundred thousand or more but less than two hundred twenty thousand in which administrative tribunals have heretofore been established, or] within a city having a population of one million or more in which administrative tribunals have heretofore, been established, and which are classified as traffic infractions, may be heard and determined pursuant to the regulations of the commissioner as provided in this article. Whenever a crime and a traffic infraction arise out of the same transaction or occurrence, a charge alleging both offenses may be made returnable before the court having jurisdiction over the crime. Nothing herein provided shall be construed to prevent a court, having jurisdiction over a criminal charge relating to traffic or a traffic infraction, from lawfully entering a judgment of conviction, whether or not based on a plea of guilty, for any offense classified as a traffic infraction.

§ 3. Subdivision 5 of section 227 of the vehicle and traffic law, as amended by section 1 of part GG of chapter 55 of the laws of 2017, is amended to read as follows:

5. All penalties and forfeited security collected pursuant to the provisions of this article shall be paid to the department of audit and control to the credit of the justice court fund and shall be subject to the applicable provisions of section eighteen hundred three of this chapter. After such audit as shall reasonably be required by the comptroller, such penalties and forfeited security shall be paid quarterly

S. 6456--A 3

or, in the discretion of the comptroller, monthly, to the appropriate jurisdiction in which the violation occurred in accordance with the provisions of section ninety-nine-a of the state finance law, except that the sum of four dollars for each violation occurring in such jurisdiction for which a complaint has been filed with the administrative tribunal established pursuant to this article shall be retained by the state. Notwithstanding any law to the contrary an additional annual sum of three million dollars collected from fines and assessed to the city of New York, shall be deposited into the general fund in accordance with the provisions of section ninety-nine-a of the state finance law. [The amount distributed during the first three quarters to the city of Rochester in any given fiscal year shall not exceed seventy percent of the amount which will be otherwise payable.] Provided, however, that if the full costs of administering this article shall exceed the amounts received and retained by the state for any period specified by the commissioner, then such additional sums as shall be required to offset such costs shall be retained by the state out of the penalties and forfeited security collected pursuant to this article.

§ 4. Subdivision 5 of section 227 of the vehicle and traffic law, as amended by section 3 of part CC of chapter 58 of the laws of 2015, is amended to read as follows:

5. All penalties and forfeited security collected pursuant to the provisions of this article shall be paid to the department of audit and control to the credit of the justice court fund and shall be subject to the applicable provisions of section eighteen hundred three of this chapter. After such audit as shall reasonably be required by the comptroller, such penalties and forfeited security shall be paid quarterly or, in the discretion of the comptroller, monthly, to the appropriate jurisdiction in which the violation occurred in accordance with the provisions of section ninety-nine-a of the state finance law, except that the sum of four dollars for each violation occurring in such jurisdiction for which a complaint has been filed with the administrative tribunal established pursuant to this article shall be retained by the state. [The amount distributed during the first three quarters to the city of Rochester in any given fiscal year shall not exceed seventy percent of the amount which will be otherwise payable.] Provided, however, that if the full costs of administering this article shall exceed the amounts received and retained by the state for any period specified by the commissioner, then such additional sums as shall be required to offset such costs shall be retained by the state out of the penalties and forfeited security collected pursuant to this article.

§ 5. Section 370 of the general municipal law is amended by adding a new subdivision 5 to read as follows:

5. There shall be an executive department or bureau of the city of Rochester known as the Rochester traffic violations agency, which shall operate under the direction and control of the mayor or the mayor's designee.

§ 6. Section 370-a of the general municipal law is amended by adding two new subdivisions 1-b and 2-a to read as follows:

1-b. "Traffic violations agency" shall mean an executive department of the city of Rochester established pursuant to subdivision five of section three hundred seventy of this article to administer and dispose of traffic infractions as authorized pursuant to this article.

2-a. "Traffic prosecutor" shall also mean an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the state of New York who, having been appointed and either hired or retained pursuant to section three hundred

S. 6456--A 4

seventy-four-b of this article, has the responsibility of prosecuting any traffic infractions returnable before the Rochester city court pursuant to the jurisdictional limitations of section three hundred seventy-one of this article.

§ 7. Section 371 of the general municipal law is amended by adding a new subdivision 2-b to read as follows:

2-b. The Rochester traffic violations agency, as established in subdivision five of section three hundred seventy of this article, may be authorized to assist the Rochester city court in the disposition and administration of infractions of traffic laws, ordinances, rules and regulations except that such agency shall not have jurisdiction over (a) the traffic infraction defined under subdivision one of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law; (b) the traffic infraction defined under subdivision five of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law; (c) the violation defined under paragraph (b) of subdivision four of section fourteen-f of the transportation law and the violation defined under clause (b) of subparagraph (iii) of paragraph c of subdivision two of section one hundred forty of the transportation law; (d) the traffic infraction defined under section three hundred ninety-seven-a of the vehicle and traffic law and the traffic infraction defined under subdivision (g) of section eleven hundred eighty of the vehicle and traffic law; (e) traffic infractions constituting parking, standing, stopping or pedestrian offenses; (f) any misdemeanor or felony; or (g) any offense that is part of the same criminal transaction, as that term is defined in subdivision two of section 40.10 of the criminal procedure law, as a violation of subdivision one of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, a violation of subdivision five of section eleven hundred ninety-two of the vehicle and traffic law, a violation of paragraph (b) of subdivision four of section fourteen-f of the transportation law, a violation of clause (b) of subparagraph (iii) of paragraph c of subdivision two of section one hundred forty of the transportation law, a violation of section three hundred ninety-seven-a of the vehicle and traffic law, a violation constituting a parking, stopping, standing or pedestrian offense, a violation of subdivision (g) of section eleven hundred eighty of the vehicle and traffic law or any misdemeanor or felony.

§ 8. Section 371 of the general municipal law is amended by adding two new subdivisions 3-b and 4-b to read as follows:

3-b. A person charged with an infraction which shall be disposed of by the Rochester traffic violations agency may be permitted to answer, within a specified time, at the traffic violations agency either in person or by written power of attorney in such form as may be prescribed in the ordinance or local law creating the agency, by paying a prescribed fine and, in writing, waiving a hearing in court, pleading guilty to the charge or a lesser charge agreeable to the traffic prosecutor and the person charged with an infraction, and authorizing the person in charge of the agency to enter such a plea and accept payment of said fine. Acceptance of the prescribed fine and power of attorney by the agency shall be deemed complete satisfaction for the violation, and the violator shall be given a receipt which so states. If a person charged with a traffic violation does not answer as hereinbefore prescribed, within a designated time, the agency may cause a complaint to be entered against him forthwith and a warrant to be issued for his arrest and appearance before the court, such summons to be predicated upon the personal service of said summons upon the person charged with

S. 6456--A 5

the infraction. Any person who shall have been, within the preceding twelve months, guilty of three or more violations, shall not be permitted to appear and answer to a subsequent violation at the agency, but must appear in court at a time specified by the agency. Such agency shall not be authorized to deprive a person of his right to counsel or to prevent him from exercising his right to appear in court to answer to, explain, or defend any charge of a violation of any traffic law, ordinance, rule or regulation.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the vehicle and traffic law, the general municipal law, the state finance law, and the criminal procedure law, in relation to the adjudication of traffic infractions

Purpose or general idea of bill

This legislation would allow the city of Rochester to adjudicate traffic violations, which are currently adjudicated by the State.

Summary of specific provisions

The bill amends various provisions of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, General Municipal Law, State Finance Law, Criminal Procedure Law and the Unconsolidated Law to create an executive department of the Rochester city government known as the Rochester Traffic Violations Agency, to assist the Rochester city court in administering and disposing of traffic infractions as authorized.

Justification

Transferring the authority to adjudicate traffic infractions from the State back to the city of Rochester will create a more comprehensive adjudication process for such violations.

Prior legislative history

New bill.

Fiscal implications

Unknown.

Effective date

This Act shall take effect on the two hundred seventieth day after it shall have become law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.