Skip to content
S6802Senate2017-2018 Session

Require Expert Witness Disclosure

Official title

“Relates to identification of expert witnesses”

Sponsor Rules CommitteeAffects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Judiciary
Impact
5/10
Moderate
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Judiciary

What's happening

This bill requires earlier disclosure and mandatory depositions of expert witnesses in medical, dental, or podiatric malpractice cases.

Why it matters

  1. Shifts the timing of expert witness disclosure. By requiring disclosure at least 60 days before a key court filing, the bill gives both plaintiffs and defendants more time to prepare, potentially reducing surprise and promoting fairer settlements or trials.

  2. Mandates depositions for all disclosed experts. Any party can now demand to depose (question under oath) the other side’s expert witnesses, and failure to make an expert available will prevent that party from using the expert’s testimony at trial, increasing accountability and transparency.

  3. Eliminates prior opt-in system. Previously, parties could choose whether or not to make their experts available for deposition in malpractice cases; this bill removes that choice, making depositions mandatory and standardizing procedure across cases.

  4. Requires reasonable compensation for expert witnesses' time. The party requesting the deposition must pay the expert a reasonable fee, which could impact litigation costs and influence parties’ strategies about the number and type of experts they retain.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Require Expert Witness Disclosure

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Rules Committee

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to judiciary
  2. Referred to rules

Full text

3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

6802

2017-2018 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

June 18, 2017

Introduced by COMMITTEE ON RULES -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules

AN ACT to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to identification of expert witnesses

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Subdivision (a) of section 3101 of the civil practice law and rules is amended by adding a new paragraph 5 to read as follows:

(5) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in subparagraph (i) of paragraph one of subdivision (d) of this section, in an action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice, each party shall serve the disclosure described therein at least sixty days prior to the filing required by rule thirty-four hundred two of this chapter. Further at any time after joinder of issue, any party may, by written notice made to and served upon all other parties and filed with the court, conduct an examination upon oral deposition, of any person who has been disclosed as an expert witness by any other party. Each party shall be required to produce his or her expert witness for examination upon oral deposition upon receipt of a notice to take oral deposition in accordance with rule thirty-one hundred seven of this chapter, and unless otherwise ordered by the court, all expert witness depositions shall be taken before the filing required by rule thirty-four hundred two of this chapter. If any party, having received such notice, fails to make that party's expert witness available for oral deposition, that party shall be precluded from offering expert testimony at the trial of the action. For purposes of rule thirty-one hundred ten and rule thirty-one hundred seventeen of this article, an expert witness, as provided in this section, shall be considered a party. Each party seeking the deposition of an expert witness shall pay the expert a reasonable fee for the time spent at the deposition.

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD13272-01-7

S. 6802 2

§ 2. Subdivision (d) of section 3101 of the civil practice law and rules, as amended by chapter 485 of the laws of 1986, paragraph 1 as amended by chapter 184 of the laws of 1988, and subparagraph (ii) of paragraph 1 as amended by chapter 165 of the laws of 1991, is amended to read as follows:

(d) [Trial preparation] Expert witness disclosure.

1. Experts. (i) Upon request, each party shall identify each person whom the party expects to call as an expert witness at trial and shall disclose in reasonable detail the subject matter on which each expert is expected to testify, the substance of the facts and opinions on which each expert is expected to testify, the qualifications of each expert witness and a summary of the grounds for each expert's opinion. However, where a party for good cause shown retains an expert an insufficient period of time before the commencement of trial to give appropriate notice thereof, the party shall not thereupon be precluded from introducing the expert's testimony at the trial solely on grounds of noncompliance with this paragraph. In that instance, upon motion of any party, made before or at trial, or on its own initiative, the court may make whatever order may be just. [In an action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice, a party, in responding to a request, may omit the names of medical, dental or podiatric experts but shall be required to disclose all other information concerning such experts otherwise required by this paragraph.

(ii) In an action for medical, dental or podiatric malpractice, any party may, by written offer made to and served upon all other parties and filed with the court, offer to disclose the name of, and to make available for examination upon oral deposition, any person the party making the offer expects to call as an expert witness at trial. Within twenty days of service of the offer, a party shall accept or reject the offer by serving a written reply upon all parties and filing a copy thereof with the court. Failure to serve a reply within twenty days of service of the offer shall be deemed a rejection of the offer. If all parties accept the offer, each party shall be required to produce his or her expert witness for examination upon oral deposition upon receipt of a notice to take oral deposition in accordance with rule thirty-one hundred seven of this chapter. If any party, having made or accepted the offer, fails to make that party's expert available for oral deposition, that party shall be precluded from offering expert testimony at the trial of the action.

(iii)] (ii) Further disclosure, except as expressly provided in paragraph five of subdivision (a) of this section, concerning the expected testimony of any expert may be obtained only by court order upon a showing of special circumstances and subject to restrictions as to scope and provisions concerning fees and expenses as the court may deem appropriate. However, a party, without court order, may take the testimony of a person authorized to practice medicine, dentistry or podiatry who is the party's treating or retained expert, as described in paragraph three of subdivision (a) of this section, in which event any other party shall be entitled to the full disclosure authorized by this article with respect to that expert without court order.

2. Materials. Subject to the provisions of paragraph one of this subdivision, materials otherwise discoverable under subdivision (a) of this section and prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for another party, or by or for that other party's representative (including an attorney, consultant, surety, indemnitor, insurer or agent), may be obtained only upon a showing that the party seeking

S. 6802 3

discovery has substantial need of the materials in the preparation of the case and is unable without undue hardship to obtain the substantial equivalent of the materials by other means. In ordering discovery of the materials when the required showing has been made, the court shall protect against disclosure of the mental impressions, conclusions, opinions or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a party concerning the litigation.

§ 3. This act shall take effect immediately.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the civil practice law and rules, in relation to identification of expert witnesses

Purpose

To require the identification and deposition of an expert witnesses to reduce frivolous litigation and permit appropriate consideration of his/her qualifications

Summary of provisions

Section 1 establishes requirement for a party to disclose its expert witness and produce such expert witness for deposition.

Section 2 removes the permissive provision in scope of disclosure as it relates to medical malpractice actions

Sections 3 establishes an effective date

Justification

Currently the plaintiff's attorney is not required to disclose the identity of the physician that must be consulted prior to filing a certificate of merit. The bill would permit defense counsel to depose expert witnesses in medical malpractice cases as they do in other civil cases. New York continue to have the highest medical malpractice costs of any state in the country. This bill will help to weed out frivolous lawsuits and reduce unnecessary costs.

Legislative history

New bill.

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

Immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.