Skip to content
A1097Assembly2019-2020 SessionSame asS6222

Pets' Interests in Divorce

Official title

“Relates to requiring the best interest of a companion animal to be considered when awarding possession in a divorce”

Sponsor Deborah GlickAD-66+12 co-sponsorsAffects Legal
Status
In Assembly Committee
Judiciary
Impact
3/10
Low
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Judiciary

What's happening

This bill requires courts to consider the best interest of companion animals when awarding possession in divorce or separation cases.

Why it matters

  1. Shifts Legal Perspective on Pets. By requiring courts to consider the best interest of companion animals, the bill moves away from treating pets purely as property in divorce or separation cases, potentially resulting in decisions more aligned with the welfare of the animal rather than just ownership rights.

  2. May Affect Custody Outcomes. The new standard could lead to different outcomes in pet custody, especially when one party is better able to provide for the animal’s physical and emotional needs—affecting who ultimately keeps the pet.

  3. Sets a Precedent for Animal Welfare in Law. This change could pave the way for broader legal recognition of animals’ interests in other contexts, signaling a growing societal shift toward considering animal welfare in legal decisions.

  4. Provides Clarity and Consistency. By defining “companion animal” using existing law and mandating a best-interest standard, the bill aims to provide clearer, more consistent guidance for judges and litigants in often contentious pet custody disputes.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Pets' Interests in Divorce

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

History

  1. Referred to judiciary
  2. Referred to judiciary

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

S6222Senate

Pets' Best Interest in Divorce

In Assembly Committee · Judiciary · Sponsor Monica Martinez

Impact 3 · Low0% to pass

Full text

1 pageUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

1097

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

IN ASSEMBLY

January 14, 2019

Introduced by M. of A. GLICK, L. ROSENTHAL, LUPARDO, COOK, VANEL, JEAN- PIERRE, JAFFEE, ZEBROWSKI, MOSLEY, ABBATE, SEAWRIGHT, M. G. MILLER, RIVERA -- read once and referred to the Committee on Judiciary

AN ACT to amend the domestic relations law, in relation to requiring the court to consider the best interest of a companion animal when awarding possession in a divorce or separation proceeding

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Subparagraph 14 of paragraph d of subdivision 5 of part B of section 236 of the domestic relations law, as renumbered by chapter 229 of the laws of 2009, is renumbered subparagraph 15 and a new subparagraph 14 is added to read as follows:

(14) in awarding the possession of a companion animal, the court shall consider the best interest of such animal. "Companion animal," as used in this subparagraph, shall have the same meaning as in subdivision five of section three hundred fifty of the agriculture and markets law;

§ 2. This act shall take effect immediately.

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD05686-01-9

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.