What's happening
This bill establishes the right for individuals to record law enforcement activities and provides legal remedies for unlawful interference.
Why it matters
Empowers individuals to hold law enforcement accountable. by legally protecting the right to record officers performing their duties, which can serve as vital evidence in cases of misconduct or disputes.
Establishes specific legal remedies for those whose recording rights are violated. , including the ability to sue for damages (including punitive damages), seek injunctive or declaratory relief, and recover attorney’s and expert fees—potentially deterring unlawful interference by officers.
Ensures that property and recordings are protected even if someone is arrested or detained. , meaning the act of being taken into custody does not automatically give law enforcement the right to seize, destroy, or access those recordings without proper legal process.
Clarifies boundaries for both the public and police. by stating that recording is only protected so long as it does not physically interfere with law enforcement activities or constitute a crime, thus balancing the right to record with public safety and order.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Bystanders and journalists recording law enforcement
The bill would protect their right to record when not under arrest or in custody and to retain control of their recordings and equipment, without permitting physical interference with law enforcement.
Police officers, peace officers and security guards
The bill would expose them to civil claims for interfering with lawful recording, with a probable-cause defense for certain claims involving obstruction of governmental administration.
People arrested or held in custody
The bill would specify that arrest or custody alone does not forfeit their right to have recordings and recording equipment preserved and returned.
Civil rights attorneys and people suing over recording interference
The bill would provide a three-year window to sue for remedies including punitive damages and injunctions, and allow courts to award prevailing plaintiffs attorney and expert fees.
Headline styles
Protect Right to Record Police
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
56 Co-sponsors
- Carl Heastie
- Crystal Peoples-Stokes
- Jeffrion Aubry
- Carmen E. Arroyo
- Al Taylor
- Anthony D'Urso
- Nathalia Fernandez
- Jose Rivera
- Alicia Hyndman
- Yuh-Line Niou
- Charles Barron
- Richard Gottfried
- Tremaine Wright
- Patricia Fahy
- Michael Blake
- Diana Richardson
- Catalina Cruz
- Harvey Epstein
- Robert J. Rodriguez
- Walter T. Mosley
- Jo Anne Simon
- Linda Rosenthal
- Felix Ortiz
- Steven Otis
- David Gantt
- Marcos Crespo
- Deborah Glick
- Latoya Joyner
- Aravella Simotas
- Robert C. Carroll
- Maritza Davila
- Clyde Vanel
- Phil Steck
- Ron Kim
- Dan Quart
- Albert A. Stirpe
- Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn
- Harry B. Bronson
- Carmen De La Rosa
- Michael DenDekker
- Mathylde Frontus
- Pamela J. Hunter
- Jonathan Jacobson
- Ellen C. Jaffee
- Barbara Lifton
- John T. McDonald III
- Daniel O'Donnell
- Victor M. Pichardo
- J. Gary Pretlow
- Philip Ramos
- Karines Reyes
- Daniel Rosenthal
- Rebecca Seawright
- Fred Thiele
- Latrice Walker
- Helene Weinstein
History
- Substituted by S3253A
- Amended on third reading 1360a
- Ordered to third reading cal.70
- Advanced to third reading cal.225
- Reported
- Referred to codes
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Protect Right to Record Police
Signed by Governor · Sponsor Kevin S. Parker
Full text
3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
1360--A Cal. No. 70
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
IN ASSEMBLY
January 15, 2019
Introduced by M. of A. PERRY, ARROYO, TAYLOR, D'URSO, FERNANDEZ, RIVERA, HYNDMAN, NIOU, BARRON, GOTTFRIED, RICHARDSON, WRIGHT -- read once and referred to the Committee on Codes -- ordered to a third reading, amended and ordered reprinted, retaining its place on the order of third reading
AN ACT to amend the civil rights law, in relation to recording certain law enforcement activities
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "New Yorker's right to monitor act".
§ 2. The civil rights law is amended by adding a new section 79-p to read as follows:
§ 79-p. Recording certain activities. 1. Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
(a) "Officer" means any peace officer, police officer, security officer, security guard or similar official who is engaged in a law enforcement activity;
(b) "Law enforcement activity" means any activity by an officer acting under the color of law; and
(c) "Record" means to capture or attempt to capture any moving or still image, sound, or impression through the use of any recording device, camera, or any other device capable of capturing audio, moving or still images, or by way of written notes or observations.
2. Right to record law enforcement related activities. A person not under arrest or in the custody of a law enforcement official has the right to record law enforcement activity and to maintain custody and control of that recording and of any property or instruments used by that person to record law enforcement activities, provided, however, that a person in custody or under arrest does not, by that status alone, forfeit the right to have any such recordings, property and equipment
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD06662-02-0
A. 1360--A 2
maintained and returned to him or her. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to permit a person to engage in actions that physically interfere with law enforcement activity or otherwise constitute a crime defined in the penal law involving obstructing governmental administration.
3. Private right of action. (a) A claim of unlawful interference with recording a law enforcement activity is established under this section when a person demonstrates that he or she exercised or attempted to exercise the right established in subdivision two of this section to record a law enforcement activity and an officer acted to interfere with that person's recording of a law enforcement activity, including but not limited to, by:
(i) intentionally preventing or attempting to prevent that person from recording law enforcement activity;
(ii) threatening that person for recording a law enforcement activity;
(iii) commanding that the person cease recording law enforcement activity when the person was nevertheless authorized under law to record;
(iv) stopping, seizing, searching, ticketing or arresting that person because that person recorded a law enforcement activity; or
(v) unlawfully seizing property or instruments used by that person to record a law enforcement activity, unlawfully destroying, or seizing a recorded image or recorded images of a law enforcement activity, or copying such a recording of a law enforcement activity without consent of the person who recorded it or approval from an appropriate court.
(b) It shall be an affirmative defense to a civil action under subparagraphs (i), (iii) and (iv) of paragraph (a) of this subdivision that at the time of such conduct by an officer, such officer had probable cause to arrest the person recording such a law enforcement activity for a crime defined in the penal law involving obstructing governmental administration.
(c) A person subject to unlawful interference with recording law enforcement activities as described in paragraph (a) of this subdivision may bring an action for any violation of this section in any court of competent jurisdiction for damages, including punitive damages, for declaratory and injunctive relief, and such other remedies as the court may deem appropriate.
(d) In any action or proceeding brought pursuant to this section, the court may allow a prevailing plaintiff reasonable attorney's fees and expert fees as a part of the costs which may be recovered.
(e) Any action or proceeding brought pursuant to this section shall be commenced no later than three years after the date on which the violation of this section is committed.
4. Preservation of rights. This section shall be in addition to all rights, procedures, and remedies available under the United States Constitution, 42 USC 1983, the constitution of the state of New York and all other federal law, state law, law of the city of New York or the administrative code of the city of New York, and all other civil remedies, including monetary damages, created by statute, ordinance, regulation or common law.
§ 3. Severability clause. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or part of this act shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the reminder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judge-
A. 1360--A 3
ment shall have been rendered. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the legislature that this act would have been enacted even if such invalid provisions had not been included herein.
§ 4. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall have become a law.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.