What's happening
This bill establishes internet service neutrality requirements for broadband providers in New York, ensuring net neutrality and compliance in state contracts.
Why it matters
Expands oversight and accountability. The bill requires the Public Service Commission to annually monitor and certify that internet providers operating in New York comply with net neutrality principles, increasing transparency and giving the state a clear enforcement mechanism.
Direct impact on public contracts and taxpayer spending. State and local government agencies—including schools, libraries, and universities—will only be able to contract with ISPs that adhere to net neutrality rules, unless no alternatives exist or a significant financial hardship can be demonstrated.
Sets clear, enforceable standards for ISPs. By defining prohibited practices (such as blocking, throttling, or paid prioritization of content) and only allowing exceptions for reasonable technical network management, the bill limits providers’ ability to favor certain internet traffic, ensuring all users have equal access.
Public reporting and pressure. The annual publication of provider compliance status by the Commission makes it easy for citizens and organizations to see which ISPs are upholding net neutrality, potentially influencing consumer and institutional choices.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Require Net Neutrality Statewide
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
39 Co-sponsors
- Didi Barrett
- Felix Ortiz
- William Magnarelli
- Richard Gottfried
- Steven Englebright
- Fred Thiele
- Jo Anne Simon
- Anthony D'Urso
- Deborah Glick
- Donna Lupardo
- Ellen C. Jaffee
- Kenneth Zebrowski
- Angelo Santabarbara
- William Colton
- Kevin Cahill
- Sandy Galef
- Walter T. Mosley
- Carmen E. Arroyo
- Rebecca Seawright
- Victor M. Pichardo
- Barbara Lifton
- Jeffrey Dinowitz
- Clyde Vanel
- Albert A. Stirpe
- Linda Rosenthal
- Phil Steck
- Thomas Abinanti
- Diana Richardson
- Tremaine Wright
- Monica P. Wallace
- Daniel O'Donnell
- Al Taylor
- Yuh-Line Niou
- Dan Quart
- Robert C. Carroll
- Carmen De La Rosa
- Karines Reyes
- Jonathan Jacobson
- Judy Griffin
1 Multi-sponsor
History
- Ordered to third reading cal.104
- Returned to assembly
- Died in senate
- Referred to rules
- Delivered to senate
- Passed assembly
- Advanced to third reading cal.334
- Reported
- Reported referred to ways and means
- Referred to corporations, authorities and commissions
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Require Internet Service Neutrality
In Senate Committee · Energy And Telecommunications · Sponsor David Carlucci
Full text
3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
2432
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
IN ASSEMBLY
January 22, 2019
Introduced by M. of A. FAHY, BARRETT, ORTIZ, MAGNARELLI, GOTTFRIED, ENGLEBRIGHT, THIELE, SIMON, D'URSO, GLICK, LUPARDO, JAFFEE, ZEBROWSKI, SANTABARBARA, COLTON, CAHILL, GALEF, MOSLEY, ARROYO, SEAWRIGHT, PICHARDO, LIFTON, DINOWITZ, VANEL, STIRPE, L. ROSENTHAL, STECK, ABINANTI, RICHARDSON, WRIGHT, WALLACE, O'DONNELL, TAYLOR, NIOU, QUART, CARROLL, DE LA ROSA -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. CROUCH -- read once and referred to the Committee on Corporations, Authorities and Commissions
AN ACT to amend the public service law and the state finance law, in relation to instituting internet service neutrality
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. The article heading of article 11 of the public service law, as added by chapter 83 of the laws of 1995, is amended to read as follows:
PROVISIONS RELATING TO CABLE TELEVISION COMPANIES AND BROADBAND
INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS
§ 2. Section 212 of the public service law is amended by adding two new subdivisions 15 and 16 to read as follows:
15. "Broadband internet access service" shall mean a mass-market retail service that provides the capability to transmit data to and receive data from all or substantially all internet endpoints, including any capabilities that are incidental to and enable the operation of the communications service, but shall not include dial-up internet access service.
16. "Broadband internet service provider" shall mean any person, business or organization qualified to do business in this state, including municipal broadband providers, that provides individuals, corporations, or other entities with broadband internet access service.
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD02295-01-9
A. 2432 2
§ 3. The section heading of section 215 of the public service law, as added by chapter 83 of the laws of 1995, is amended and a new subdivision 14 is added to read as follows:
Duties of the commission in respect to cable television companies and broadband internet service providers.
14. Develop and maintain a statewide plan for the monitoring of broadband internet service providers, including the annual certification that broadband internet service providers comply with the internet service neutrality requirements established in section two hundred thirty-one of this article.
§ 4. The state finance law is amended by adding a new section 148 to read as follows:
§ 148. Internet service neutrality requirements in certain procurement contracts. Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, where a contract that includes broadband internet access services is to be awarded by a state agency as defined in section one hundred sixty of this chapter or any state or local authority as such terms are defined in section two of public authorities law, municipal corporation as defined in section two of the general municipal law, public library or association library, as such terms are defined in section two hundred fifty-three of the education law, the legislature, judiciary, state university of New York, or city university of New York pursuant to a competitive bidding process or a request for proposal process, such competitive bidding process or request for proposal and the subsequent awarded contract shall require that such broadcast internet access services are compliant with the internet service neutrality requirements established in section two hundred thirty-one of the public service law. Provided, however, the entity awarding such contract may award such contract to any broadband internet service provider that is not certified by the public service commission pursuant to subdivision two of section two hundred thirty-one of the public service law only if such entity demonstrates to the public service commission that either (i) there are no other broadband internet service providers available to contract with, or (ii) awarding such contract to a certified broadband internet service provider would result in a significant financial hardship when compared to awarding the contract to a broadband internet service provider not certified by the public service commission.
§ 5. The public service law is amended by adding a new section 231 to read as follows:
§ 231. Internet service neutrality. 1. For purposes of this section, "network management practice" shall mean a practice that has a primarily technical network management justification, but does not include other business practices. A "reasonable network management practice" shall mean a network management practice that is primarily used for and tailored to achieving a legitimate network management purpose, taking into account the particular network architecture and technology of the broadband internet access service.
2. The commission shall certify annually that any broadband internet service provider qualified to do business in this state, does not:
(a) block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management.
(b) impair or degrade lawful internet traffic on the basis of internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
(c) engage in paid prioritization, including, but not limited to, traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of
A. 2432 3
preferential traffic management, either (i) in exchange for any form of consideration from a third party, or (ii) to benefit an affiliated entity, unless the broadband internet service provider demonstrates that the practice would provide a significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the internet.
3. The commission shall annually prepare a report that lists the certification status for every broadband internet service provider qualified to do business in this state. Such report shall be published on the commission's website and updated at least annually. The commission shall notify the governor, the temporary president of the senate, and the speaker of the assembly of the publication of such report and any updates.
§ 6. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it shall have become a law.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.