What's happening
This bill allows the New York Secretary of State to designate lay individuals as one-day marriage officiants to solemnize weddings.
Why it matters
Expands flexibility and personalization for couples. The bill allows friends, family, or other trusted individuals (not just clergy or officials) to legally perform a wedding ceremony, making the event more meaningful and tailored to the wishes of the couple.
Creates a clear, regulated process for one-day officiants. The Secretary of State will oversee applications, require proof of identity, details about the ceremony, and collect a fee, ensuring officiants are accountable and ceremonies are legally valid.
Accessible to non-residents and non-clergy. Laypersons over 18 can apply regardless of where they live, opening up the role of officiant to out-of-state friends or relatives who wish to participate in New York weddings.
Protects the legal validity and order of ceremonies. By requiring applications at least 30 days in advance and limiting authority to a single, specified ceremony, the law reduces the risk of unauthorized or fraudulent officiations, while maintaining the integrity of marriage records.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Allow One-Day Wedding Officiants
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
1 Co-sponsor
History
- Recommit, enacting clause stricken
- Referred to judiciary
Full text
4 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
1430
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
January 14, 2019
Introduced by Sens. RITCHIE, SEPULVEDA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary
AN ACT to amend the domestic relations law and the executive law, in relation to designating lay individuals to solemnize marriages
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Subdivisions 1, 1-a, 2 and 3-a of section 11 of the domestic relations law, subdivision 1 as amended by chapter 95 of the laws of 2011, subdivision 1-a as amended by chapter 96 of the laws of 2011, subdivision 2 as amended by section 1 of subpart E of part B of chapter 20 of the laws of 2015, and subdivision 3-a as added by chapter 450 of the laws of 2014, are amended and a new subdivision 3-b is added to read as follows:
1. A clergyman or minister of any religion, or by the senior leader, or any of the other leaders, of The Society for Ethical Culture in the city of New York, having its principal office in the borough of Manhattan, or by the leader of The Brooklyn Society for Ethical Culture, having its principal office in the borough of Brooklyn of the city of New York, or of the Westchester Ethical Society, having its principal office in Westchester county, or of the Ethical Culture Society of Long Island, having its principal office in Nassau county, or of the Riverdale-Yonkers Ethical Society having its principal office in Bronx county, or by the leader of any other Ethical Culture Society affiliated with the American Ethical Union; provided that no clergyman or minister as defined in section two of the religious corporations law, or Society for Ethical Culture leader shall be required to solemnize any marriage when acting in his or her capacity under this subdivision. [1-a.] A refusal by a clergyman or minister as defined in section two of the religious corporations law, or Society for Ethical Culture leader to solemnize any marriage under this subdivision shall not create a civil claim or cause of action or result in any state or local government
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD04895-01-9
S. 1430 2
action to penalize, withhold benefits or discriminate against such clergyman or minister[.]; or,
2. The current or a former governor, a mayor of a village, a county executive of a county, or a mayor, recorder, city magistrate, police justice or police magistrate of a city, a former mayor or the city clerk of a city of the first class of over one million inhabitants or any of his or her deputies or not more than four regular clerks, designated by him or her for such purpose as provided in section eleven-a of this article, except that in cities which contain more than one hundred thousand and less than one million inhabitants, a marriage shall be solemnized by the mayor, or police justice, and by no other officer of such city, except as provided in subdivisions one and three of this section[.]; or,
3-a. A judge or peacemaker judge of any Indian tribal court, a chief, a headman, or any member of any tribal council or other governing body of any nation, tribe or band of Indians in this state duly designated by such body for the purpose of officiating at marriages, or any other persons duly designated by such body, in keeping with the culture and traditions of any such nation, tribe or band of Indians in this state, to officiate at marriages[.]; or,
3-b. A one-day marriage officiant, as designated by the secretary of state pursuant to section one hundred ten of the executive law; or,
§ 2. Section 12 of the domestic relations law is amended to read as follows:
§ 12. Marriage, how solemnized. No particular form or ceremony is required when a marriage is solemnized as herein provided by a clergyman [or], magistrate, or one-day marriage officiant as designated by the secretary of state pursuant to section one hundred ten of the executive law but the parties must solemnly declare in the presence of a clergyman [or], magistrate, or one-day marriage officiant and the attending witness or witnesses that they take each other as [husband and wife] spouses. In every case, at least one witness beside the clergyman [or], magistrate, or one-day marriage officiant must be present at the ceremony.
The preceding provisions of this chapter, so far as they relate to the manner of solemnizing marriages, shall not affect marriages among the people called friends or quakers; nor marriages among the people of any other denominations having as such any particular mode of solemnizing marriages; but such marriages must be solemnized in the manner heretofore used and practiced in their respective societies or denominations, and marriages so solemnized shall be as valid as if this article had not been enacted.
§ 3. Section 13 of the domestic relations law, as amended by chapter 95 of the laws of 2011, is amended to read as follows:
§ 13. Marriage licenses. It shall be necessary for all persons intended to be married in New York state to obtain a marriage license from a town or city clerk in New York state and to deliver said license, within sixty days, to the clergyman [or], magistrate, or one-day marriage officiant as designated by the secretary of state pursuant to section one hundred ten of the executive law who is to officiate before the marriage ceremony may be performed. In case of a marriage contracted pursuant to subdivision four of section eleven of this chapter, such license shall be delivered to the judge of the court of record before whom the acknowledgment is to be taken. If either party to the marriage resides upon an island located not less than twenty-five miles from the office or residence of the town clerk of the town of which such island
S. 1430 3
is a part, and if such office or residence is not on such island such license may be obtained from any justice of the peace residing on such island, and such justice, in respect to powers and duties relating to marriage licenses, shall be subject to the provisions of this article governing town clerks and shall file all statements or affidavits received by him while acting under the provisions of this section with the town clerk of such town. No application for a marriage license shall be denied on the ground that the parties are of the same, or a different, sex.
§ 4. Section 13-b of the domestic relations law, as amended by chapter 35 of the laws of 2017, is amended to read as follows:
§ 13-b. Time within which marriage may be solemnized. A marriage shall not be solemnized within twenty-four hours after the issuance of the marriage license, unless authorized by an order of a court of record as hereinafter provided, nor shall it be solemnized after sixty days from the date of the issuance of the marriage license unless authorized pursuant to section three hundred fifty-four-d of the executive law. Every license to marry hereafter issued by a town or city clerk, in addition to other requirements specified by this chapter, must contain a statement of the day and the hour the license is issued and the period during which the marriage may be solemnized. It shall be the duty of the clergyman [or], magistrate, or one-day marriage officiant, as designated by the secretary of state pursuant to section one hundred ten of the executive law, performing the marriage ceremony, or if the marriage is solemnized by written contract, of the judge before whom the contract is acknowledged, to annex to or endorse upon the marriage license the date and hour the marriage is solemnized. A judge or justice of the supreme court of this state or the county judge of the county in which either party to be married resides, or if such party is at least seventeen years of age, the judge of the family court of such county, if it shall appear from an examination of the license and any other proofs submitted by the parties that one of the parties is in danger of imminent death, or by reason of other emergency public interest will be promoted thereby, or that such delay will work irreparable injury or great hardship upon the contracting parties, or one of them, may, upon making written affirmative findings under subdivision three of section fifteen of this article, make an order authorizing the immediate solemnization of the marriage and upon filing such order with the clergyman [or], magistrate, or one-day marriage officiant performing the marriage ceremony, or if the marriage is to be solemnized by written contract, with the judge before whom the contract is acknowledged, such clergyman [or], magistrate, or one day marriage officiant may solemnize such marriage, or such judge may take such acknowledgment as the case may be, without waiting for such three day period and twenty-four hour period to elapse. The clergyman, magistrate [or], judge, or one-day marriage officiant, as designated by the secretary of state pursuant to section one hundred ten of the executive law, must file such order with the town or city clerk who issued the license within five days after the marriage is solemnized. Such town or city clerk must record and index the order in the book required to be kept by him or her for recording affidavits, statements, consents and licenses, and when so recorded the order shall become a public record and available in any prosecution under this section. A person who shall solemnize a marriage in violation of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of fifty dollars for each offense, and in
S. 1430 4
addition thereto, his or her right to solemnize a marriage shall be suspended for ninety days.
§ 5. The executive law is amended by adding a new section 110 to read as follows:
§ 110. Designation of one-day marriage officiant. The secretary, or his or her designee, shall issue one-day marriage officiant designations to laypersons over the age of eighteen regardless of state residence who intend to perform a marriage solemnization ceremony within the state. Such designations shall only be issued after an applicant remits a completed application form and fee, both to be determined by the secretary. The application form shall require the following information and be accompanied by legal proof of identification. From the applicant requesting designation: applicant name, date of birth, legal address, email address and telephone number. The application form shall also require the names, addresses and birth dates of the parties to be married as they appear on the application for a marriage license issued by a town or city clerk in the state, the name of the city, town or village in which such solemnization will be performed and the exact date of the solemnization. The application and fee must be received by the department at least thirty days before the date of the ceremony. The department shall notify the applicant of approval of such designation no later than seven days prior to the date of the marriage ceremony stated on the application. Such designations shall only be valid for the ceremony stated on the application and shall expire upon completion of such solemnization.
§ 6. This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law. Effective immediately, the addition, amendment and/or repeal of any rule or regulation necessary for the implementation of this act on its effective date are authorized to be made and completed on or before such effective date.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the domestic relations law and the executive law, in relation to designating lay individuals to solemnize marriages
Purpose
The purpose of this legislation is to designate lay individuals as one- day marriage officiants in order to solemnize marriages.
Summary of provisions
Section 1. A new subdivision 3-b is added to Section 11 of the Domestic Relations Law, and will read as follows: A one-day marriage officiant, as designated by the secretary of state pursuant to section one hundred ten of the Executive Law.
Read the full memo (724 words)
Section 2. Section 12 of the Domestic Relations Law is amended as follows: No particular form or ceremony is required when a marriage is solemnized as herein provided by a clergyman, magistrate, or one-day marriage officiant as designated by the secretary of state pursuant to section one hundred ten of the Executive Law.
Section 3. Section 13 of the Domestic Relations Law is amended as follows: It shall be necessary for all persons intended to be married in New York State to obtain a marriage license from a town, or city clerk in New York State and to deliver said license, within sixty days, to the clergyman, magistrate, or one-day marriage officiant as designated by the secretary of state pursuant to section one hundred ten of the Execu- tive Law who is to officiate before the marriage ceremony may be performed.
Section 4. Section 13-b of the Domestic Relations Law is amended by adding "one-day marriage officiant" to clergyman and magistrate.
Section 5. The Executive Law is amended by adding a new section 110 that outlines the requirements that must be met to designate a layperson as a one-day marriage officiant.
Section 6. Establishes the effective date.
Justification
For generations, getting married meant standing solemnly in front of clergy from one of the long-established religious faiths or a secular official with the authority to solemnize a wedding.
However, an increasing number of couples, with an eye on creating a personal ceremony as unique as the bride and groom, are choosing to be married by a friend or relative. In order to do so, such laypersons request and obtain ordinations from online churches as ministers in the belief that is confers legality of the marriage.
However, New York law is unclear about the legal empowerment of minis- ters who are ordained online for the sole purpose to preside over weddings. Domestic Relations Law allows for marriages to be solemnized by a "clergyman or minister of any religion." However, the question to whether such a minister is authorized to perform is unclear. At issue as if the ordaining internet "church" is within the statutory definition of dictated in the Religious Corporations Law.
However, a marriage is a legal contract. There have been instances where this lack of clarity over an imposed definition of church and qualifies clergy leaves open the possibility for these marriages to be vulnerable to legal challenges, such as the context of annulment, divorce or estate battles. In Ranieri v. Ranieri (1989) the New York State Appellate Court, Second Judicial Department held that a minster from a non-denomi- national online church had no authorizations to perform marriages. However more recently, in Oswald v. Oswald (2013) the Appellate Court Third Department ruled that the same organization may be able to ordain ministers who can legally officiate marriages. To further confuse the situation, some jurisdictions in the State recognize online ordination while some do not leaving even local, county, and state officials uncer- tain of parameters governing the rules of internet ordained ministers. At this time, the matter is undecided and subject to interpretation by the presiding court, yet it carries the potential consequences of a marriage that is deemed void.
California, Massachusetts and Vermont have passed laws that legally allow individuals to become temporary marriage officials for one day in acknowledgement of these contemporary trends in ceremony preferences. Based on those models, this legislation will allow the Secretary of the State to authorize an individual as a "one-day marriage officiant" to officiate at a specific marriage in New York, thereby providing a remedy to the question of validity of a marriage performed by a layperson.
Legislative history
2017-2018: S.5858B/A.1137D
Fiscal implications
None.
Effective date
This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become law.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.