Skip to content
S1738Senate2019-2020 Session

Enforce Speedy Trial Limits

Official title

“Relates to time limits for a speedy trial”

Sponsor Jamaal BaileySD-36+22 co-sponsorsAffects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Codes
Impact
8/10
Significant
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Codes

What's happening

This bill, "Kalief's law," amends New York's speedy trial rules to tighten requirements for prosecutors to be ready for trial and limits delays.

Why it matters

  1. Requires prosecutors to prove they are actually ready for trial, not just say so. The court must now make an on-the-record inquiry into the prosecution’s readiness whenever they claim to be ready for trial. This aims to prevent perfunctory or misleading "ready" statements that delay cases without real progress, addressing a key loophole that has led to prolonged pretrial detention.

  2. Limits permissible delays and court discretion. The bill removes court congestion as a valid reason to exclude time from speedy trial calculations, meaning system backlogs can no longer justify holding defendants longer. This creates greater accountability for timely case processing and is likely to pressure courts and prosecutors to address inefficiencies.

  3. Expands protections to youth and minor offenses. The law now covers those committed to the Office of Children and Family Services and includes vehicle and traffic law infractions in speedy trial requirements, broadening the scope to cover more defendants and minor charges, which often disproportionately affect vulnerable populations.

  4. Strengthens defense rights and transparency. After a defendant requests evidence, a prosecutor’s readiness claim must be accompanied by a certification that they’ve complied with disclosure rules, and the defense gets a chance to contest this on the record. This helps ensure fairer pretrial procedures and reduces the risk of surprise evidence or coerced plea deals due to withheld information.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Enforce Speedy Trial Limits

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

History

  1. Referred to codes
  2. Referred to codes

Full text

6 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

1738

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

January 16, 2019

Introduced by Sens. BAILEY, ADDABBO, BIAGGI, BRESLIN, CARLUCCI, COMRIE, KAVANAGH, KRUEGER, MONTGOMERY, RIVERA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes

AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to time limits for a speedy trial

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as "Kalief's law".

§ 2. Section 30.30 of the criminal procedure law, as added by chapter 184 of the laws of 1972, paragraph (a) of subdivision 3 as amended by chapter 93 of the laws of 2006, paragraph (a) of subdivision 4 as amended by chapter 558 of the laws of 1982, paragraph (c) of subdivision 4 as amended by chapter 631 of the laws of 1996, paragraph (h) of subdivision 4 as added by chapter 837 of the laws of 1986, paragraph (i) of subdivision 4 as added by chapter 446 of the laws of 1993, paragraph (j) of subdivision 4 as added by chapter 222 of the laws of 1994, paragraph (b) of subdivision 5 as amended by chapter 109 of the laws of 1982, paragraphs (e) and (f) of subdivision 5 as added by chapter 209 of the laws of 1990, is amended to read as follows: § 30.30 Speedy trial; time limitations.

1. Except as otherwise provided in subdivision three, a motion made pursuant to paragraph (e) of subdivision one of section 170.30 or paragraph (g) of subdivision one of section 210.20 must be granted where the people are not ready for trial within:

(a) six months of the commencement of a criminal action wherein a defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a felony;

(b) ninety days of the commencement of a criminal action wherein a defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a misdemeanor punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of more than three months and none of which is a felony;

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD05618-01-9

S. 1738 2

(c) sixty days of the commencement of a criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a misdemeanor punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of not more than three months and none of which is a crime punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of more than three months; or

(d) thirty days of the commencement of a criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a violation and none of which is a crime.

(e) for the purposes of this subdivision, the term offense shall include vehicle and traffic law infractions.

2. Except as provided in subdivision three, where a defendant has been committed to the custody of the sheriff or the office of children and family services in a criminal action he or she must be released on bail or on his or her own recognizance, upon such conditions as may be just and reasonable, if the people are not ready for trial in that criminal action within:

(a) ninety days from the commencement of his or her commitment to the custody of the sheriff or the office of children and family services in a criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a felony;

(b) thirty days from the commencement of his or her commitment to the custody of the sheriff or the office of children and family services in a criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a misdemeanor punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of more than three months and none of which is a felony;

(c) fifteen days from the commencement of his or her commitment to the custody of the sheriff or the office of children and family services in a criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a misdemeanor punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of not more than three months and none of which is a crime punishable by a sentence of imprisonment of more than three months; or

(d) five days from the commencement of his or her commitment to the custody of the sheriff or the office of children and family services in a criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of one or more offenses, at least one of which is a violation and none of which is a crime.

(e) for the purposes of this subdivision, the term offense shall include vehicle and traffic law infractions.

3. (a) Subdivisions one and two do not apply to a criminal action wherein the defendant is accused of an offense defined in sections 125.10, 125.15, 125.20, 125.25, 125.26 and 125.27 of the penal law.

(b) A motion made pursuant to subdivisions one or two upon expiration of the specified period may be denied where the people are not ready for trial if the people were ready for trial prior to the expiration of the specified period and their present unreadiness is due to some exceptional fact or circumstance, including, but not limited to, the sudden unavailability of evidence material to the people's case, when the district attorney has exercised due diligence to obtain such evidence and there are reasonable grounds to believe that such evidence will become available in a reasonable period.

(c) A motion made pursuant to subdivision two shall not:

(i) apply to any defendant who is serving a term of imprisonment for another offense;

S. 1738 3

(ii) require the release from custody of any defendant who is also being held in custody pending trial of another criminal charge as to which the applicable period has not yet elapsed;

(iii) prevent the redetention of or otherwise apply to any defendant who, after being released from custody pursuant to this section or otherwise, is charged with another crime or violates the conditions on which he has been released, by failing to appear at a judicial proceeding at which his presence is required or otherwise.

4. In computing the time within which the people must be ready for trial pursuant to subdivisions one and two, the following periods must be excluded:

(a) a reasonable period of delay resulting from other proceedings concerning the defendant, including but not limited to: proceedings for the determination of competency and the period during which defendant is incompetent to stand trial; demand to produce; request for a bill of particulars; pre-trial motions; appeals; trial of other charges; and the period during which such matters are under consideration by the court; or

(b) the period of delay resulting from a continuance granted by the court at the request of, or with the consent of, the defendant or his or her counsel. The court [must] may grant such a continuance only if it is satisfied that postponement is in the interest of justice, taking into account the public interest in the prompt dispositions of criminal charges. A defendant without counsel must not be deemed to have consented to a continuance unless he or she has been advised by the court of his or her rights under these rules and the effect of his consent, which must be done on the record in open court; or

(c) (i) the period of delay resulting from the absence or unavailability of the defendant. A defendant must be considered absent whenever his location is unknown and he is attempting to avoid apprehension or prosecution, or his location cannot be determined by due diligence. A defendant must be considered unavailable whenever his location is known but his presence for trial cannot be obtained by due diligence; or

(ii) where the defendant has either escaped from custody or has failed to appear when required after having previously been released on bail or on his own recognizance, and provided the defendant is not in custody on another matter, the period extending from the day the court issues a bench warrant pursuant to section 530.70 because of the defendant's failure to appear in court when required, to the day the defendant subsequently appears in the court pursuant to a bench warrant or voluntarily or otherwise; or

(d) a reasonable period of delay when the defendant is joined for trial with a co-defendant as to whom the time for trial pursuant to this section has not run and good cause is not shown for granting a severance; or

(e) the period of delay resulting from detention of the defendant in another jurisdiction provided the district attorney is aware of such detention and has been diligent and has made reasonable efforts to obtain the presence of the defendant for trial; or

(f) the period during which the defendant is without counsel through no fault of the court; except when the defendant is proceeding as his own attorney with the permission of the court; or

(g) other periods of delay occasioned by exceptional circumstances, including but not limited to, the period of delay resulting from a continuance granted at the request of a district attorney if (i) the continuance is granted because of the unavailability of evidence materi-

S. 1738 4

al to the people's case, when the district attorney has exercised due diligence to obtain such evidence and there are reasonable grounds to believe that such evidence will become available in a reasonable period; or (ii) the continuance is granted to allow the district attorney additional time to prepare the people's case and additional time is justified by the exceptional circumstances of the case. Any such exclusion when a statement of unreadiness has followed a statement of readiness made by the people must be evaluated by the court after inquiry on the record as to the reasons for the people's unreadiness and shall only be approved upon a showing of sufficient supporting facts; or

(h) the period during which an action has been adjourned in contemplation of dismissal pursuant to sections 170.55, 170.56 and 215.10 of this chapter[.]; or

(i) [The] the period prior to the defendant's actual appearance for arraignment in a situation in which the defendant has been directed to appear by the district attorney pursuant to subdivision three of section 120.20 or subdivision three of section 210.10[.]; or

(j) the period during which a family offense is before a family court until such time as an accusatory instrument or indictment is filed against the defendant alleging a crime constituting a family offense, as such term is defined in section 530.11 of this chapter.

5. Whenever pursuant to this section a prosecutor states or otherwise provides notice that the people are ready for trial, the court shall make inquiry on the record as to their actual readiness. If, after conducting its inquiry, the court determines that the people are not ready to proceed to trial, the prosecutor's statement or notice of readiness shall not be valid for purposes of this section. Following a demand to produce by a defendant pursuant to section 240.20, any statement of trial readiness must be accompanied or preceded by a certification of good faith compliance with the disclosure requirements of section 240.20 and the defense shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard on the record as to whether the disclosure requirements have been met. This subdivision shall not apply to cases where the defense has waived disclosure requirements.

5-a. Upon a local criminal court accusatory instrument, a statement of readiness shall not be valid unless all counts charged in the accusatory instrument meet the requirements of subdivisions one, two or three of section 100.40 of this chapter and the prosecution moves to dismiss any counts not meeting such.

6. In computing the time within which the people must be ready for trial, pursuant to subdivision two of this section, no period of delay resulting from court congestion shall be excluded.

7. In computing the time within which the people must be ready for trial, pursuant to paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) of subdivision one of this section, no period of delay resulting from court congestion shall be excluded.

[5.] 8. For purposes of this section, (a) where the defendant is to be tried following the withdrawal of the plea of guilty or is to be retried following a mistrial, an order for a new trial or an appeal or collateral attack, the criminal action and the commitment to the custody of the sheriff or the office of children and family services, if any, must be deemed to have commenced on the date the withdrawal of the plea of guilty or the date the order occasioning a retrial becomes final;

(b) where a defendant has been served with an appearance ticket, the criminal action must be deemed to have commenced on the date the defendant first appears in a local criminal court in response to the ticket;

S. 1738 5

(c) where a criminal action is commenced by the filing of a felony complaint, and thereafter, in the course of the same criminal action either the felony complaint is replaced with or converted to an information, prosecutor's information or misdemeanor complaint pursuant to article [180] one hundred eighty or a prosecutor's information is filed pursuant to section 190.70, the period applicable for the purposes of subdivision one must be the period applicable to the charges in the new accusatory instrument, calculated from the date of the filing of such new accusatory instrument; provided, however, that when the aggregate of such period and the period of time, excluding the periods provided in subdivision four, already elapsed from the date of the filing of the felony complaint to the date of the filing of the new accusatory instrument exceeds six months, the period applicable to the charges in the felony complaint must remain applicable and continue as if the new accusatory instrument had not been filed;

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to time limits for a speedy trial

Purpose or general idea of bill

This bill amends section 30.30 of the Criminal Penal Law to ensure cases go to trial in a. reasonable timeframe.

Summary of specific provisions

Section 1: Establishes that this act shall be known as "Kalief's Law"

Read the full memo (804 words)

Section 2: Section 30.30 of the Criminal Procedure Law is amended by:

*Allowing the court, whenever a prosecutor states the people are ready for trial, to make an inquiry as to the people's actual readiness. If, after conducting its inquiry, the court determines the people are not ready, the statement or notice of readiness shall not be valid.

*Requiring a statement of trial readiness be accompanied or preceded by a certification of good faith compliance with the disclosure require- ments set forth in section 240.20 of the Criminal Procedure Law and the defense has an opportunity to be heard on record as to whether the disclosure requirements have been met.

*Stating that a statement of readiness shall not be valid unless the prosecuting attorney certifies that all counts are converted and facial- ly sufficient and that those counts that are not have been dismissed.

*Requiring that exclusions to the computation of time, when a statement of unreadiness has followed a statement of readiness made by the People, be accompanied by supporting facts and approved by the court. The court shall inquire on the record as to the reasons for the people's unread- iness.

*Requiring that at each court appearance date preceding the commencement of trial in a criminal action, the court, whenever it is practicable to so, shall rule on whether the adjournment period immediately following the court appearance date is to be included or excluded for the purposes of computing time within which the people must be ready for trial.

*Clarifying that for purposes of subdivision two of Section 30.30 of the Criminal Procedure Law, no time attributable to court congestion shall be excluded.

*Clarifying that for purposes of dismissal of misdemeanors/violations, no time attributable to court congestion shall be excluded.

Justification

Kalief Browder spent three years jailed at Rikers Island, on a charge for which he was never tried or convicted. He was released in March 2013, having spent more than 700 days in solitary confinement. On June

6, 2015, Kalief committed suicide, a final and permanent indictment of New York's "speedy trial" statute.

In May 2010, 16-year-old Kalief Browder was arrested for stealing a backpack. While awaiting the basic American right of a speedy trial, Kalief had 31 court dates during his three years in jail, despite New York's so-called "speedy trial" statute, which says that the People must be ready for trial within six months for felony charges; 90 days for Class A Misdemeanors; 60 days for Class B Misdemeanors; and 30 days for violations.

Unfortunately, this case is not unique. According to a 2016 Daily News article, in 2016, between 1,300-1,400 people had been in NYC jails for more than a year awaiting trial. A 2014 report found that 7,286 felony cases had been pending more than six months. A 2013 New York Times arti- cle reported that in the Bronx, where Browder was arrested, the median case length from arrest to disposition was 517 days, and more than 70 percent of felony cases surpassed New York's "speedy trials" guidelines.

Under current statute, prosecutors are allowed to declare readiness for trial by simply stating so. At the very next court date, the People can declare themselves "not ready" and ask for an adjournment. Yet, even though it may take multiple weeks to get a court date, the prosecution is only clocked for the adjournment period it requested. As a 2014 New Yorker article pointed out, "Every time a prosecutor stood before a judge in Browder's case, requested a one-week adjournment, and got six weeks instead, this counted as only one week against the six-month dead- line."

Kalief's Law will reduce undue delay by requiring the court to approve exclusions when a statement of unreadiness has followed a statement of readiness, and having the court rule on the number of days that should be included for speedy trial purposes. Kalief's Law will ensure that a statement of "readiness" is real by tying it to discovery requirements, requiring the People to possess evidence that they are in fact "ready" for trial while allowing for flexibility when the facts merit additional time. According to a 2014 New York Law Journal article, "A solution to the intertwined problems of extended pretrial incarceration and discov- ery delay is to reunite the concepts of trial readiness and discovery compliance."

Prior legislative history

2017-18: S7006B - Amended and Recommitted to Codes

Effective date

60 days after it becomes law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.