Skip to content
S2009Senate2019-2020 Session

Ban Animal Ownership for Abusers

Official title

“Limits ownership or possession of companion animals by "Buster's Law" violators”

Sponsor James TediscoSD-49+2 co-sponsors
Status
In Senate Committee
Domestic Animal Welfare
Impact
5/10
Moderate
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Domestic Animal Welfare

What's happening

This bill prohibits people convicted under "Buster's Law" from owning companion animals without court approval and redefines horses' legal status.

Why it matters

  1. Expands restrictions for animal abusers. The bill goes beyond standard penalties by barring anyone convicted under "Buster's Law" from owning or possessing companion animals unless they receive explicit court approval—a safeguard to help prevent further abuse.

  2. Requires mental health evaluation for animal ownership. Convicted individuals must undergo psychiatric or psychological testing, and only those who are proven by “clear and convincing evidence” to be mentally capable and fit to care for animals can regain the right to own them. This adds a layer of mental health scrutiny to animal welfare.

  3. Redefines horses’ legal protection. By removing horses from the definition of “farm animals” and classifying them as “equine companions” when used for recreation or as pets, the bill potentially extends greater legal protections and stricter anti-cruelty standards to many horses in New York, rather than treating them solely as livestock.

  4. Could influence animal welfare standards statewide. If enacted, these changes may set a precedent for how other states handle animal cruelty offenders and the legal status of companion animals, signaling a broader shift toward prioritizing animal well-being in the justice system.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Ban Animal Ownership for Abusers

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
James Tedisco

Senator · Senate District 49

History

  1. Referred to domestic animal welfare
  2. Referred to domestic animal welfare

Full text

2 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

2009

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

January 18, 2019

Introduced by Sens. TEDISCO, BOYLE, O'MARA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Domestic Animal Welfare

AN ACT to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to limiting the ownership or possession of companion animals by persons convicted of violating "Buster's Law"; and in relation to horses

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Section 353-a of the agriculture and markets law is amended by adding a new subdivision 4 to read as follows:

4. On and after the effective date of this subdivision, no person who is convicted of a violation of this section shall own or possess a companion animal unless and until authorized by a court order issued by a county court judge of his or her county of residence. No such order shall be issued until such convicted person first demonstrates to the court that he or she has undergone psychiatric or psychological testing, the results of which indicate by clear and convincing evidence of his or her capable and sound mental capacity and ability to own and properly care for such an animal in a humane manner.

§ 2. Subdivision 4 of section 350 of the agriculture and markets law, as added by chapter 569 of the laws of 1995, is amended to read as follows:

4. "Farm animal", as used in this article, means any ungulate, poultry, species of cattle, sheep, swine, goats, llamas[, horses] or furbearing animals, as defined in section 11-1907 of the environmental conservation law, which are raised for commercial or subsistence purposes. Fur-bearing animal shall not include dogs or cats.

§ 3. Section 350 of the agriculture and markets law is amended by adding a new subdivision 6 to read as follows:

6. "Equine companion", as used in this article, means any horse so used for recreational pursuits, including but not limited to: racing,

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD05176-01-9

S. 2009 2

jumping, showing, rehabilitative purposes or otherwise treated in an open and known fashion as a "companion animal" or "pet" as defined in subdivision five of this section.

§ 4. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall have become a law.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to limiting the ownership or possession of companion animals by persons convicted of violating "Buster's Law"; and in relation to horses

Purpose or general idea of bill

To increase penalties (maximum prison sentences and maximum fines) for engaging in animal fighting and committing the crime of Aggravated Cruelty to Animals (aka Buster's Law) and require psychiatric evaluation/treatment for those committing the crime of Aggravated Cruel- ty to Animals.

Summary of specific provisions

Section 353-a of the agriculture and markets law is amended by adding a new subdivision 4 to read as follows:

Read the full memo (768 words)

4. On and after the effective date of this subdivision, no person who is convicted of a violation of this section shall own or possess a compan- ion animal unless and until authorized by a court order issued by a county court judge of his or her county of residence. No such order shall be issued until such convicted person first demonstrates to the court that he or she has undergone psychiatric or psychological testing, the results of which indicate by clear and convincing evidence of his or her capable and sound mental capacity and ability to own and properly care for such an animal in a humane manner.

2. Subdivision 4 of section 350 of the agriculture and markets law, as added by chapter 569 of the laws of 1995, is amended to read as follows:

4. "Farm animal", as used in this article, means any ungulate, poull6 try, species of cattle, sheep, swine, goats, llamas , HORSES or fur bearing animals, as defined in section 11-1907 of the environmental conservation law, which are raised for commercial or subsistence purposes. Fur-bearing animal shall not include dogs or cats.

§ 3. Section 350 of the agriculture and markets law is amended by adding a new subdivision 6 to read as follows:

6. "Equine companion", as used in this article, means any horse so used for recreational pursuits, including but not limited to: racing, jump- ing, showing, rehabilitative purposes or otherwise treated in an open and known fashion as a "companion animal" or "pet" as defined in subdi- vision five of this section.

Justification

In the early 2000s, media fury surrounding Atlanta Falcon Michael Vick's dog fighting case including allegations that he brutally executed dogs not considered vicious or aggressive enough focused attention on the gruesome world of animal fighting.

According to the U.S. Humane Society, dog fighting is illegal in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Forty-eight states and the District of Columbia have made dog fighting a felony offense; 47 states prohibit the possession of dogs for fighting and 46 states prohibit being a spec- tator at a dog fight. In July 2007, the Humane Society ranked New York State 44th among states in the severity of its dog fighting laws. While the state considers dog fighting a felony, being a spectator (having paid an admission or made a bet) at these fights or owning or possessing a dog with the intent to use it in a dogfight are only misdemeanors.

This bill would create felony penalties for these acts, significantly increasing both applicable prison terms and fines, to provide more mean- ingful deterrents against this blood sport.

The maximum prison term for the crime of Aggravated Cruelty to Animals (aka Buster's Law), the intentional killing or intentionally causing serious physical injury to a companion animal with animal cruelty is only two years and/or a $5,000 fine. Animal cruelty is viewed by experts as an indicator for future violence against humans. This bill would increase the maximum prison sentence to four years and maximum fine to $10,000, making the punishment more fitting of the crime.

Animal cruelty is viewed by experts as an indicator for future violence against humans. Since his 1997 arrest that led to "Buster's Law," Ches- ter Williamson has been imprisoned numerous times for crimes including Possession of Stolen Property and Attempted Burglary. In Fall 2007 his criminal path took a predictable turn with his arrest for attempted rape, sexual abuse and unlawful imprisonment of a 12-year-old girl.

Requiring early intervention in the form of psychiatric evaluation and treatment would be another tool in the attempt to modify behavior patterns to halt this pattern from escalating

Prior legislative history

02/06/15: S.3400 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

01/06/16: S.3400 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

02/02/17: S.4038 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

01/03/18: S.4038 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

Fiscal implications for state and local governments

None

Effective date

This act shall take effect on the 30th day after becoming law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.