What's happening
This bill expands compensation and benefits for wrongfully convicted individuals, including higher damages, scholarships, and civil service exam credits.
Why it matters
Lowers the Burden of Proof for Compensation. By changing the standard from “clear and convincing evidence” to “a preponderance of the evidence,” it becomes significantly easier for wrongfully convicted individuals to obtain compensation, potentially increasing access to justice for those who have been exonerated.
Guarantees Minimum Monetary Compensation and Legal Fee Coverage. The bill sets a minimum award of $1 million per year of wrongful incarceration (when not serving a sentence for another crime) and explicitly allows courts to award reasonable attorneys’ fees for legal costs incurred during both exoneration and compensation claims, providing more robust financial restitution and support for legal redress.
Expands Eligibility and Benefits for Exonerees and Their Families. In addition to direct compensation, the bill creates scholarships covering full tuition, fees, and non-tuition costs at SUNY/CUNY institutions for exonerees or, at their election, their children. This not only addresses the economic impact of wrongful convictions but also supports the future prospects of affected families.
Provides Civil Service Exam Preference. Successful claimants are granted a ten-point advantage on competitive civil service exams for original appointments, recognizing the disadvantage faced by exonerees re-entering the workforce and promoting their access to stable public sector jobs.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Help for Wrongfully Convicted
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
3 Co-sponsors
History
- Referred to judiciary
- Print number 2074a
- Amend (t) and recommit to judiciary
- Referred to judiciary
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Aid for Wrongfully Convicted
In Assembly Committee · Judiciary · Sponsor Jeffrion Aubry
Full text
6 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
2074--A
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
January 22, 2019
Introduced by Sen. BENJAMIN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee
AN ACT to amend the court of claims act and the tax law, in relation to claims for unjust conviction; to amend the education law, in relation to establishing wrongful conviction recovery scholarships; and to amend the civil service law, in relation to allowing additional credits for the wrongfully convicted
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "wrongful conviction recovery act".
§ 2. Section 8-b of the court of claims act, as added by chapter 1009 of the laws of 1984, subdivision 2 as amended by chapter 210 of the laws of 2007, is amended to read as follows:
§ 8-b. Claims for unjust conviction [and imprisonment]. 1. The legislature finds and declares that innocent persons who have been wrongly convicted of crimes [and subsequently imprisoned] have been frustrated in seeking legal redress due to a variety of substantive and technical obstacles in the law and that such persons should have an available avenue of redress over and above the existing tort remedies to seek compensation for damages. The legislature intends by enactment of the provisions of this section that those innocent persons who can demonstrate by [clear and convincing] a preponderance of the evidence that they were unjustly convicted [and imprisoned] be able to recover damages against the state. In light of the substantial burden of proof that must be carried by such persons, it is the intent of the legislature that the court, in exercising its discretion as permitted by law regarding the weight and admissibility of evidence submitted pursuant to this section, shall, in the interest of justice, give due consideration to difficul-
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD06085-02-9
S. 2074--A 2
ties of proof caused by the passage of time, the death or unavailability of witnesses, the destruction of evidence or other factors not caused by such persons or those acting on their behalf.
2. Any person convicted [and subsequently imprisoned] for one or more felonies or misdemeanors against the state which he or she did not commit may, under the conditions hereinafter provided, present a claim for damages against the state. In scheduling court appearances and filing deadlines, the court shall give docket priority at each stage of the proceeding to such claims for damages under this subdivision where the claimant asserts proof of innocence through DNA evidence. Any adjournments granted in the course of such a proceeding should be for as short a time as is practicable.
3. In order to present the claim for unjust conviction [and imprisonment], claimant must establish by documentary evidence that:
(a) he or she has been convicted of one or more felonies or misdemeanors against the state [and subsequently sentenced to a term of imprisonment, and has served all or any part of the sentence]; and
(b) (i) he or she has been pardoned upon the ground of innocence of the crime or crimes for which he or she was sentenced and which are the grounds for the complaint; or (ii) his or her judgment of conviction was reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument dismissed or, if a new trial was ordered, either he or she was found not guilty at the new trial or he or she was not retried and the accusatory instrument dismissed; provided that the [judgement] judgment of conviction was reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument was dismissed, on any of the following grounds: (A) [paragraph (a), (b), (c), (e) or (g) of] subdivision one of section 440.10 of the criminal procedure law; or (B) [subdivision one (where based upon grounds set forth in item (A) hereof, two, three (where the count dismissed was the sole basis for the imprisonment complained of) or five of] section 470.20 of the criminal procedure law; or (C) comparable provisions of the former code of criminal procedure or subsequent law; or (D) the statute, or application thereof, on which the accusatory instrument was based violated the constitution of the United States or the state of New York; and
(c) his or her claim is not time-barred by the provisions of subdivision seven of this section.
4. The claim shall state facts in sufficient detail to permit the court to find that claimant is likely to succeed at trial in proving that (a) he or she did not commit any of the acts charged in the accusatory instrument or his or her acts or omissions charged in the accusatory instrument did not constitute a felony or misdemeanor against the state, and (b) he or she did not by his or her own conduct cause or bring about his or her conviction. The claim shall be verified by the claimant. If the court finds after reading the claim that claimant is not likely to succeed at trial, it shall dismiss the claim, either on its own motion or on the motion of the state.
5. In order to obtain a judgment in his or her favor, claimant must prove by [clear and convincing] a preponderance of the evidence that:
(a) he or she has been convicted of one or more felonies or misdemeanors against the state [and subsequently sentenced to a term of imprisonment, and has served all or any part of the sentence]; and
(b) (i) he or she has been pardoned upon the ground of innocence of the crime or crimes for which he or she was sentenced and which are the grounds for the complaint; or (ii) his or her judgment of conviction was reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument dismissed or, if a new trial was ordered, either he or she was found not guilty at the new
S. 2074--A 3
trial or he or she was not retried and the accusatory instrument dismissed; provided that the [judgement] judgment of conviction was reversed or vacated, and the accusatory instrument was dismissed, on any of the following grounds: (A) [paragraph (a), (b), (c), (e) or (g) of] subdivision one of section 440.10 of the criminal procedure law; or (B) [subdivision one (where based upon grounds set forth in item (A) hereof two, three (where the count dismissed was the sole basis for the imprisonment complained of) or five of] section 470.20 of the criminal procedure law; or (C) comparable provisions of the former code of criminal procedure or subsequent law; or (D) the statute, or application thereof, on which the accusatory instrument was based violated the constitution of the United States or the state of New York; and
(c) he or she did not commit any of the acts [charged in the accusatory instrument or his acts or omissions charged in the accusatory instrument] or omissions for which he or she was convicted or his or her acts or omissions did not constitute a felony or misdemeanor against the state; and
(d) he or she did not by his or her own conduct cause or bring about his or her conviction.
6. If the court finds that the claimant is entitled to a judgment, it shall award damages in such sum of money as the court determines will fairly and reasonably compensate him or her, provided, if the claimant was incarcerated, such sum shall not be less than an award calculated at a rate of one million dollars per year during which the claimant was incarcerated and was not under sentence for a separate crime. The court may also award reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in the claimant's defense at trial, including any post-trial motions or appeals, in the process of vacating or reversing his or her criminal conviction, and in the pursuit of a claim under this section.
7. Any person claiming compensation under this section based on a pardon that was granted before the effective date of this section or the dismissal of an accusatory instrument that occurred before the effective date of the chapter of the laws of two thousand nineteen that amended this section shall file his or her claim within two years after [the] such effective date [of this section]. Any person claiming compensation under this section based on a pardon that was granted on or after the effective date of this section or the dismissal of an accusatory instrument that occurred on or after the effective date of the chapter of the laws of two thousand nineteen that amended this section shall file his or her claim within [two] three years after the pardon or dismissal.
§ 3. Subsection (c) of section 612 of the tax law is amended by adding a new paragraph 43 to read as follows:
(43) The amount of any damage award amounts received pursuant to section eight-b of the court of claims act and not excludable from federal adjusted gross income.
§ 4. The education law is amended by adding a new section 668-h to read as follows:
§ 668-h. Wrongful conviction recovery scholarships. 1. Eligible persons. Notwithstanding subdivisions three and five of section six hundred sixty-one of this article, individuals pursuant to section eight-b of the court of claims act that have been determined to be entitled to a judgment for unjust conviction or upon their election any children of an individual having been determined to be entitled to a judgment for unjust conviction shall be eligible to receive a wrongful conviction recovery scholarship.
S. 2074--A 4
2. Amount. (a) The president shall grant annual scholarships to any person eligible pursuant to subdivision one of this section. Recipients shall be granted annual scholarships if they are attending an institution of the city university of New York or an institution of the state university of New York including the statutory colleges at Cornell, the college of environmental science and forestry at Syracuse and the college of ceramics at Alfred. The annual award shall be an amount equal to the tuition charged at such institution provided that, notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the tuition charged to award recipients shall not exceed that charged to state resident students attending such institution; the mandatory fees charged at such institution; and the non-tuition cost of attendance at such institution or college, provided that the scholarship shall not exceed an amount that is equal to the total cost of attendance determined for federal Title IV student financial aid purposes, less all other scholarships and grants provided by New York state, other states, the federal government, or other governments, and the amount of educational benefits paid under any program that would duplicate the purposes of this program, provided that any scholarships or grants provided to a recipient by the institution which are intended to fund any portion of the difference between the annual state award and the actual costs of attendance at any such institution shall not be considered to duplicate the purposes of this program.
(b) "Non-tuition cost of attendance", as used in this subdivision, shall mean: (i) the actual amount charged by the institution for room and board, and (ii) an allowance for transportation, books and supplies as determined by the president and as approved by the director of the budget, provided that such determination shall be made no later than December first of each year for use in the succeeding academic year. In the event a student does not incur room or board charges at the institution, "non-tuition cost of attendance" shall mean an allowance for room and board as determined by the president and approved by the director of the budget. In determining allowances pursuant to this subparagraph, the president may take into consideration the allowances provided for in the Pell grant program.
(c) In no event shall the combination of all student financial aid received by a student exceed a recipient's total cost of attendance at the institution being attended.
3. Duration. Awards under this section shall be payable for each of not more than four academic years of undergraduate study or five academic years if a program normally requires five years, as defined by the commissioner pursuant to article thirteen of this title.
§ 5. The civil service law is amended by adding a new section 85-d to read as follows:
§ 85-d. Additional credits allowed for the wrongfully convicted. 1. Additional credit authorized. Additional credits shall be allowed to successful claimants under section eight-b of the court of claims act in competitive examinations for original appointment. (a) On all eligible lists resulting from competitive examinations, the names of eligible persons shall be entered in the order of their respective final earned ratings on examinations, with the name of the eligible person with the highest final earned ratings at the head of such list, provided, however, that for the purpose of determining final earned ratings, successful claimants under section eight-b of the court of claims act shall be entitled to receive an additional ten points in a competitive examination for original appointment.
S. 2074--A 5
(b) Such additional credit shall be added to the final earned rating of such successful claimant after he or she has qualified in the competitive examination and shall be granted only at the time of establishment of the resulting eligible list.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the court of claims act and the tax law, in relation to claims for unjust conviction; to amend the education law, in relation to establishing wrongful conviction recovery scholar- ships; and to amend the civil service law, in relation to allowing addi- tional credits for the wrongfully convicted
Purpose
To provide compensation and other benefits in the Court of Claims for people who have been wrongfully convicted and incarcerated in New York State..
Summary of provisions
Section 1 names this act "the wrongfully convicted recovery act."
Section 2 amends section 8-b of the court of claims act to establish remedies for responding to claims for unjust conviction and imprison- ment, and to establish conditions under which a person is eligible for remedies under this section.
Section 3 adds a new section 13-a to the tax law. This section exempts cash awards granted under this section to be exempt from state taxation.
Section 4 creates wrongful conviction scholarships in the education law.
Section 5 amends the civil service law to allow for examination credits for the wrongfully convicted.
Section 6 provides an effective date.
Justification
There have been approximately 1,810 exonerations of wrongfully convicted individuals nationwide since 1989; 214 of them in New York State. Of those exonerated in New York, 38 were based on DNA evidence, eight of which occurred in the past 5 years. There have also been exonerations in non-DNA cases involving false confessions, eyewitness error, false evidence, and police, prosecutor or judicial misconduct. In New York State, the total years served for those who were exonerated was in excess of 2,000, averaging 9.74 years in prison per person for crimes they did not commit. In 2014, the Brooklyn DA created the Conviction Review Unit (CRU), which has exonerated 20 people through 2016.
One recent set of exonerations from the CRU involved three men who were found guilty of starting a fire that killed a mother and her five chil- dren in 1980 inside a Park Slope brownstone. The CRU "concluded that the single eyewitness who connected them to the crime was a habitual liar who recanted on her death bed" and that the science used to determine that the fire was arson was in fact junk science. Current fire experts determined that the fire was probably accidental. Two of the exonerated defendants served over 30 years each in prison and the third died behind bars.
People who are wrongfully convicted often spend decades in prison and emerge with no money and few job skills, have not worked long enough to receive social security benefits, and have little or no financial support from family or friends. They may need extensive therapy, have medical issues, or simply be too old to participate significantly in the work force. It is imperative that the State compensate these individuals for the time they have been wrongfully incarcerated and give them the ability to make a fresh start in the years remaining to them. This bill would give the Court of Claims the authority to provide broad financial relief to such individuals and to give them health benefits and access to re-entry programs.
Legislative history
2017-18: S.7978/A.5306A 2016: A10169-A.
Fiscal implications
To be determined
Local fiscal implications
To be determined
Effective date
This act shall take effect immediately.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.