Skip to content
S2158Senate2019-2020 Session

Crack Down on Wage Theft

Official title

“Enacts the "Omnibus Prevailing Wage Enforcement Act"”

Sponsor Jamaal BaileySD-36Affects Economy
Status
In Senate Committee
Labor
Impact
8/10
Significant
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Labor

What's happening

This bill strengthens prevailing wage enforcement in New York by creating an inspector general, increasing transparency, and tightening requirements for public works contracts.

Why it matters

  1. Creation of a Prevailing Wage Fraud Inspector General. The bill establishes a dedicated Inspector General with broad investigative powers—including subpoena authority—to uncover and address prevailing wage fraud. This could significantly increase oversight and deterrence of wage theft and labor law violations on public works projects.

  2. Enhanced Transparency and Public Access. Public entities are now required to make detailed wage, supplement, and hour records for contractor employees available for public inspection. This removes previous barriers to accessing these records and enables greater scrutiny by workers, unions, journalists, and watchdog groups.

  3. Stricter Bidding and Compliance Requirements. Contractors whose bids are unusually low must now prove their intent and ability to pay prevailing wages, reducing incentives for underbidding through wage theft. Additional requirements include daily headcounts and payroll documentation, with criminal penalties for submitting false records.

  4. Increased State Investment in Enforcement. The law earmarks public work enforcement fund resources to maintain or increase staffing levels for investigators and administrative personnel, ensuring there are sufficient resources for ongoing and future enforcement efforts, audits, and investigations of public works projects.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Crack Down on Wage Theft

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Jamaal Bailey

Senator · Senate District 36

Chair, Codes

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to labor
  2. Referred to labor

Full text

9 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

2158

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

January 23, 2019

Introduced by Sen. BAILEY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Labor

AN ACT to amend the labor law, the general municipal law and the public officers law, in relation to the omnibus prevailing wage enforcement act; and to amend chapter 511 of the laws of 1995, relating to establishing a public work enforcement fund and making an appropriation therefor, in relation to moneys accumulated in the public work enforcement fund

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "omnibus prevailing wage enforcement act".

§ 2. The labor law is amended by adding a new section 223-a to read as follows:

§ 223-a. Prevailing wage fraud inspector general. 1. Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply:

(a) "Inspector general" means the prevailing wage fraud inspector general created by this section.

(b) "Assistant inspector general" means a prevailing wage fraud assistant inspector general created by this section.

2. Appointment, compensation and removal. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the governor shall appoint the inspector general. The board shall employ and the governor shall fix the compensation of the inspector general. The inspector general shall, and may do so without civil service examination, appoint and the board shall employ, such assistant inspector general and other persons as he or she deems necessary, determine their duties and fix their compensation. Such assistant inspector general shall assist the inspector general in carrying out the inspector general's duties and responsibilities as set forth in this section and shall have such powers as granted the inspector general under this section. Employees appointed pursuant to this section with-

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD05466-01-9

S. 2158 2

out civil service examination shall be placed in the noncompetitive class of the competitive service pursuant to subdivision two-a of section forty-two of the civil service law and shall serve at the pleasure of the governor.

3. Powers, duties and responsibilities. The inspector general shall investigate violations of the laws and regulations pertaining to the operation of prevailing wage provisions. The inspector general shall have the following powers, duties and functions:

(a) to conduct and supervise investigations, within or without this state, of possible fraud and other violations of laws, rules and regulations pertaining to prevailing wage provisions;

(b) to subpoena witnesses, administer oaths or affirmations, take testimony and compel the production of such books, papers, records and documents as the inspector general may deem to be relevant to an investigation undertaken pursuant to this section;

(c) to report to the attorney general or other appropriate law enforcement agency, violations found through investigations undertaken pursuant to this section and to provide such materials and assistance as may be necessary or appropriate for the successful investigation and prosecution of violations of this chapter;

(d) to submit a written report, on an annual basis, to the governor and to the chair of the board, listing all activities undertaken to the extent such activities can be disclosed pursuant to subdivision five of this section; and

(e) to recommend legislative and regulatory changes to the governor and to the chair of the board.

4. Cooperation of agency officials and employees. (a) In addition to the authority otherwise provided by this section, the inspector general, in carrying out the provisions of this section, is authorized:

(i) to have full and unrestricted access to all records, reports, audits, reviews, documents, papers, recommendations or other material maintained by the board or any other state agency relating to prevailing wage provisions, with respect to which the inspector general has responsibilities under this section; and

(ii) to request such information, assistance and cooperation from any federal, state or local government, department, board, bureau, commission, or other agency or unit thereof as may be necessary for carrying out the duties and responsibilities enjoined upon the inspector general by this section. State and local agencies or units thereof are hereby authorized and directed to provide such information, assistance and cooperation.

(b) No person shall prevent, seek to prevent, interfere with, obstruct or otherwise hinder any investigation being conducted pursuant to this section.

5. Disclosure of information. The inspector general shall not publicly disclose information which is:

(a) a part of an ongoing investigation or prosecution; or

(b) specifically prohibited from disclosure by any other provision of law.

§ 3. Sections 1 and 2 of chapter 511 of the laws of 1995, relating to establishing a public work enforcement fund and making an appropriation therefor, as amended by chapter 407 of the laws of 2005, are amended to read as follows:

Section 1. The state comptroller shall establish a public work enforcement fund. Each state agency or public benefit corporation entering into a contract for any construction, reconstruction, renovation,

S. 2158 3

repair, maintenance or other improvement, as defined in subdivision 2 of section 220 of the labor law, shall make a transfer of 0.10 of one percent of the total cost of the contract to such fund. All transfers shall be made available to the labor department for labor law enforcement. All moneys transferred to and accumulated in the public work enforcement fund shall be dedicated to enforcement of labor law articles 8 and 9 and all moneys appropriated from such fund shall be used for such purpose. Provided further that such dedicated funds shall be used for training, labor and related costs for investigators, hearing officers and administrative staff to ensure that staffing levels for such personnel are maintained at [an appropriate level] a level equal to or greater than the staffing level for such personnel for fiscal year 2019-2020.

§ 2. The sum of [two million four hundred thousand dollars ($2,400,000), or so much thereof as may be] moneys so accumulated[,] is hereby appropriated to the department of labor from any moneys credited to the public work enforcement fund created pursuant to section one of this act for the purposes of carrying out the provisions of this act. Such sum shall be payable on the audit and warrant of the state comptroller on vouchers certified or approved by the commissioner of labor, or his duly designated representative in the manner provided by law. No expenditure shall be made from this appropriation until a certificate of approval of availability shall have been issued by the director of the budget and filed with the state comptroller and a copy filed with the chair of the senate finance committee and the chair of the assembly ways and means committee. Such certificate may be amended from time to time by the director of the budget and a copy of each such amendment shall be filed with the state comptroller, the chair of the senate finance committee and the chair of the assembly ways and means committee.

§ 4. Section 220 of the labor law is amended by adding a new subdivision 10 to read as follows:

10. In any instance where the variation between the low bid on any public work contract or subcontract with the state, any municipal corporation or public body and the next lowest bid is ten percent or more, or is ten percent lower than the contracting entity's estimate of the project cost, the low bidder shall provide proof to the satisfaction of the contracting entity that the prevailing wage shall be paid, or such bid shall be rejected.

§ 5. Section 231 of the labor law is amended by adding a new subdivision 8 to read as follows:

8. In any instance where the variation between the low bid on any public work contract or subcontract with the state, any municipal corporation or public body and the next lowest bid is ten percent or more, or is ten percent lower than the contracting entity's estimate of the project cost, the low bidder shall provide proof to the satisfaction of the contracting entity that the prevailing wage shall be paid, or such bid shall be rejected.

§ 6. Section 220 of the labor law is amended by adding a new subdivision 6-a to read as follows:

6-a. The fiscal officer shall require each engineer-in-charge or other agent who has direct supervision of the execution of the contract representing the contracting agency other than the contractor or his or her employees on all contracts requiring prevailing wage rates to record a daily headcount of all workers on a project site, separately enumerated regarding each classification of worker including hours worked at regular, overtime or holiday pay as classified in the prevailing wage

S. 2158 4

rate schedule. Such records shall be submitted to the fiscal officer and shall be maintained by the fiscal officer for three years after the final acceptance of the project. Knowingly providing the fiscal officer with false records shall be a misdemeanor.

§ 7. Subdivision 1 of section 103 of the general municipal law, as amended by section 1 of chapter 2 of the laws of 2012, is amended to read as follows:

1. Except as otherwise expressly provided by an act of the legislature or by a local law adopted prior to September first, nineteen hundred fifty-three, all contracts for public work involving an expenditure of more than thirty-five thousand dollars which are subject to the provisions of article eight of the labor law, and all purchase contracts involving an expenditure of more than twenty thousand dollars, shall be awarded by the appropriate officer, board or agency of a political subdivision or of any district therein including but not limited to a soil conservation district to the lowest responsible bidder furnishing the required security after advertisement for sealed bids in the manner provided by this section, provided, however, that purchase contracts (including contracts for service work, but excluding any purchase contracts necessary for the completion of a public works contract pursuant to article eight of the labor law) may be awarded on the basis of best value, as defined in section one hundred sixty-three of the state finance law, to a responsive and responsible bidder or offerer in the manner provided by this section except that in a political subdivision other than a city with a population of one million inhabitants or more or any district, board or agency with jurisdiction exclusively therein the use of best value for awarding a purchase contract or purchase contracts must be authorized by local law or, in the case of a district corporation, school district or board of cooperative educational services, by rule, regulation or resolution adopted at a public meeting. Such officer, board, or agency may require responsible bidders and their subcontractors to participate in apprenticeship training programs approved by the department of labor. In any case where a responsible bidder's or responsible offerer's gross price is reducible by an allowance for the value of used machinery, equipment, apparatus or tools to be traded in by a political subdivision, the gross price shall be reduced by the amount of such allowance, for the purpose of determining the best value. In cases where two or more responsible bidders furnishing the required security submit identical bids as to price, such officer, board or agency may award the contract to any of such bidders. Such officer, board or agency may, in his or her or its discretion, reject all bids or offers and readvertise for new bids or offers in the manner provided by this section. In determining whether a purchase is an expenditure within the discretionary threshold amounts established by this subdivision, the officer, board or agency of a political subdivision or of any district therein shall consider the reasonably expected aggregate amount of all purchases of the same commodities, services or technology to be made within the twelve-month period commencing on the date of purchase. Purchases of commodities, services or technology shall not be artificially divided for the purpose of satisfying the discretionary buying thresholds established by this subdivision. A change to or a renewal of a discretionary purchase shall not be permitted if the change or renewal would bring the reasonably expected aggregate amount of all purchases of the same commodities, services or technology from the same provider within the twelve-month period commencing on the date of the first purchase to an amount greater than the discre-

S. 2158 5

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the labor law, the general municipal law and the public officers law, in relation to the omnibus prevailing wage enforcement act; and to amend chapter 511 of the laws of 1995, relating to estab- lishing a public work enforcement fund and making an appropriation therefor, in relation to moneys accumulated in the public work enforce- ment fund

Purpose or general idea of bill

To enact the "Omnibus Prevailing Wage Enforcement Act."

Summary of specific provisions

Section one of the bill contains its title, "Omnibus Prevailing Wage Enforcement Act."

Read the full memo (612 words)

Part A creates the office of the Prevailing Wage Fraud Inspector General for increased vigilance in the effort to achieve prevailing wage enforcement.

Part B (Article 3) of the bill amends section. two of chapter 511 of the laws of 1995 to remove the cap on accumulations of money in the Public Work Enforcement Fund and to establish a maintenance of effort in enforcement activity.

Part C (Articles 4 & 5) calls for verification of the intent to pay prevailing wage where there is a 10 percent difference between the lowest and next lowest bid for the construction of public work projects.

Part D (Article 6) of the bill calls for a daily head count of workers at prevailing wage projects.

Part E (Articles 7 & 8) would allow public authorities to require that successful bidders for public work jobs participate in a state sponsored apprenticeship program.

Part F would prohibit contractors who had been convicted of a felony with respect to a public work project with the state, a. municipal corporation, public benefit corporation or public body from partic- ipation in public works contracts for five years.

Part G (Articles 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, & 14) would enable the public to view wage information submitted by contractors participating in public works projects.

Part H (Article 15) of the bill would require a summary transcript, containing classification and payroll information, to be submitted upon completion of a public works project.

Part I (Article 16) would require that the Department of Jurisdiction notify the Department of Labor of projects costing over $1M so that the Department could make appropriate arrangements for audits of the project's compliance with the prevailing wage law. The last sections of

the bill contain a severability clause and the effective date informa- tion.

Justification

Given the many complaints received, over many years, by the Labor Committee and members of the legislature concerning problems with prevailing wage enforcement, a comprehensive approach to enforcement of the prevailing wage is needed. This bill is comprised of three new legislative proposals and six bills vetoed by the Executive which concern enforcement of the prevailing wage law. The three new proposals are for the creation of an office of the Prevailing Wage Fraud Inspector General, removing the limit on collections from the sub-assessment for Prevailing Wage Enforcement Fund and for mandatory audits of projects over $1M. The establishment of a Prevailing Wage Fraud Inspector General would result in increased scrutiny of the process and greater compliance with the law. Removing the cap on collections through the existing sub- allocation on prevailing wage projects would generate much needed reven- ue for enforcement. Mandatory audits to be determined on a schedule worked cut by the Department of Labor and contracting entity would ensure that audits are done on other than a complaint driven basis.

Prior legislative history

2015-16: S.2189 - Referred to Labor

2017-18: S.3796 - Referred to Labor

Fiscal implications

Would result in increased enforcement and penalty collection and addi- tional revenue due to the proper payment of wages.

Effective date

Immediately, with provisions.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.