What's happening
This bill requires courts to seal certain drug-related convictions for defendants who complete treatment programs, and reforms procedures for adjournments in contemplation of dismissal.
Why it matters
Automatically seals certain drug convictions. for individuals who complete court-sanctioned treatment programs, removing prior judicial discretion and making sealing mandatory rather than optional. This can make it easier for people in recovery to move on from past arrests and improve access to jobs, housing, and education.
Expands eligibility for sealing prior misdemeanors. connected to drug offenses, raising the number of prior offenses that can be sealed from three to five, and clarifies that most misdemeanors—except those requiring sex offender registration—are eligible. This change addresses the long-term impact of criminal records on people with histories of substance use.
Standardizes and shortens adjournment periods for certain cases. (including marijuana charges), capping most at 90 days (previously up to 12 months in some cases), with clear procedures for modifying or revoking adjournments. This provides more predictable timelines for case resolution and reduces lengthy legal uncertainty for defendants.
Removes barriers for adjournments and sealing in marijuana cases. , eliminating previous restrictions based on prior criminal history or prosecutor consent. This means more people facing low-level marijuana charges can have their cases dismissed and records sealed, supporting broader criminal justice reform efforts around drug policy.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Seal Defendant Records Faster
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
No co-sponsors yet.
History
- Referred to codes
- Referred to codes
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Automatically Seal Certain Records
Assembly Floor Calendar · Sponsor Dan Quart
Full text
4 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
2278
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
January 23, 2019
Introduced by Sen. HOYLMAN -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes
AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to orders of adjournment in contemplation of dismissal and sealing of defendant records
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Subdivision 1 of section 160.58 of the criminal procedure law, as added by section 3 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows:
1. A defendant convicted of any offense defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-one of the penal law or a specified offense defined in subdivision five of section 410.91 of this chapter who has successfully completed a judicial diversion program under article two hundred sixteen of this chapter, or one of the programs heretofore known as drug treatment alternative to prison or another judicially sanctioned drug treatment program of similar duration, requirements and level of supervision, and has completed the sentence imposed for the offense or offenses, [is eligible to] shall have such offense or offenses sealed pursuant to this section.
§ 2. Subdivision 2 of section 160.58 of the criminal procedure law, as added by section 3 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows:
2. The court that sentenced the defendant to a judicially sanctioned drug treatment program [may on its own motion, or on the defendant's motion,] shall order that all official records and papers relating to the arrest, prosecution and conviction which resulted in the defendant's participation in the judicially sanctioned drug treatment program be conditionally sealed. In such case, the court may also conditionally seal the arrest, prosecution and conviction records for no more than [three] five of the defendant's prior [eligible] misdemeanors, [which
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD01432-01-9
S. 2278 2
for purposes of this subdivision shall be limited to misdemeanor offenses defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-one of the penal law. The court may only seal the records of the defendant's arrests, prosecutions and convictions when] provided that a misdemeanor for which registration as a sex offender is required shall not be sealed pursuant to this section. The court may seal such records when:
(a) the sentencing court has requested and received from the division of criminal justice services or the Federal Bureau of Investigation a fingerprint based criminal history record of the defendant, including any sealed or suppressed information. The division of criminal justice services shall also include a criminal history report, if any, from the Federal Bureau of Investigation regarding any criminal history information that occurred in other jurisdictions. The division is hereby authorized to receive such information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation for this purpose. The parties shall be permitted to examine these records;
(b) the defendant or court has identified the misdemeanor conviction or convictions for which relief may be granted;
(c) the court has received documentation that the sentences imposed on the [eligible] misdemeanor convictions have been completed, or if no such documentation is reasonably available, a sworn affidavit that the sentences imposed on the prior misdemeanors have been completed; and
(d) the court has notified the district attorney of each jurisdiction in which the defendant has been convicted of an offense with respect to which sealing is sought, and the court or courts of record for such offenses, that the court is considering sealing the records of the defendant's [eligible] misdemeanor convictions. Both the district attorney and the court shall be given a reasonable opportunity, which shall not be less than thirty days, in which to comment and submit materials to aid the court in making such a determination.
§ 3. Subdivision 3 of section 160.58 of the criminal procedure law, as added by section 3 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows:
3. At the request of the defendant or the district attorney of a county in which the defendant committed a crime that is the subject of the sealing application, the court [may] shall conduct a hearing to consider and review any relevant evidence offered by either party that would aid the court in its decision whether to seal the records of the defendant's arrests, prosecutions and convictions. In making such [a] determination, the court shall consider any relevant factors, including but not limited to the following factors: (i) the circumstances [and seriousness] of the offense or offenses that resulted in the conviction or convictions; (ii) [the character of the defendant, including his or her] the defendant's completion of the judicially sanctioned treatment program as described in subdivision one of this section; (iii) the defendant's criminal conviction history taking into account the time that has elapsed since the occurrence of any conviction and the age of the defendant at the time of such conviction; and (iv) the impact of sealing the defendant's records upon his or her rehabilitation and his or her successful and productive reentry and reintegration into society, and on public safety.
§ 4. Subdivision 2 of section 170.55 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 222 of the laws of 1994, is amended to read as follows:
2. An adjournment in contemplation of dismissal is an adjournment of the action without date ordered [with a view to ultimate] intended for the dismissal of the accusatory instrument in furtherance of justice.
S. 2278 3
Upon issuing such an order, the court must release the defendant on his own recognizance. [Upon application of the people, made at any time not more than six months, or in the case of a family offense as defined in subdivision one of section 530.11 of this chapter, one year, after the issuance of such order, the court may restore the case to the calendar upon a determination that dismissal of the accusatory instrument would not be in furtherance of justice, and the action must thereupon proceed. If the case is not so restored within such six months or one year period, the accusatory instrument is, at the expiration of such period, deemed to have been dismissed by the court in furtherance of justice.] At any time prior to dismissal the court may modify the conditions or extend or reduce the term of adjournment, except that the total period of adjournment shall not exceed ninety days, or in the case of a family offense as defined in section 530.11 of this chapter, the period of adjournment shall not be more than one year. Upon violation of any condition fixed by the court, the court may revoke its order and restore the case to the calendar and the prosecution may proceed. If the case is not so restored to the calendar during the period fixed by the court, the accusatory instrument is, at the expiration of such period, deemed to have been dismissed.
§ 5. Section 170.56 of the criminal procedure law, as added by chapter 1042 of the laws of 1971, subdivision 1 as amended by chapter 360 of the laws of 1977 and subdivision 3 as amended by chapter 905 of the laws of 1977, is amended to read as follows: § 170.56 Adjournment in contemplation of dismissal in cases involving
marihuana.
1. Upon or after arraignment in a local criminal court upon an information, a prosecutor's information or a misdemeanor complaint, where the sole remaining count or counts charge a violation or violations of section 221.05, 221.10, 221.15, 221.35 or 221.40 of the penal law and before the entry of a plea of guilty thereto or commencement of a trial thereof, the court, upon motion of a defendant, may order that all proceedings be suspended and the action adjourned in contemplation of dismissal, or upon a finding that adjournment would not be necessary [or appropriate] and the setting forth in the record of the reasons for such findings, may dismiss in furtherance of justice the accusatory instrument[; provided, however, that the court may not order such adjournment in contemplation of dismissal or dismiss the accusatory instrument if: (a) the defendant has previously been granted such adjournment in contemplation of dismissal, or (b) the defendant has previously been granted a dismissal under this section, or (c) the defendant has previously been convicted of any offense involving controlled substances, or (d) the defendant has previously been convicted of a crime and the district attorney does not consent or (e) the defendant has previously been adjudicated a youthful offender on the basis of any act or acts involving controlled substances and the district attorney does not consent].
2. [Upon ordering the action adjourned in contemplation of dismissal, the court must set and specify such conditions for the adjournment as may be appropriate, and such conditions may include placing the defendant under the supervision of any public or private agency. At any time prior to dismissal the court may modify the conditions or extend or reduce the term of the adjournment, except that the total period of adjournment shall not exceed twelve months. Upon violation of any condition fixed by the court, the court may revoke its order and restore the case to the calendar and the prosecution thereupon must proceed. If
S. 2278 4
the case is not so restored to the calendar during the period fixed by the court, the accusatory instrument is, at the expiration of such period, deemed to have been dismissed in the furtherance of justice.] An adjournment in contemplation of dismissal is an adjournment of the action without date ordered intended for the dismissal of the accusatory instrument in furtherance of justice. Upon issuing such an order, the court must release the defendant on his own recognizance. At any time prior to dismissal the court may modify the conditions or extend or reduce the term of adjournment, except that the total period of adjournment shall not exceed ninety days. Upon violation of any condition fixed by the court, the court may revoke its order and restore the case to the calendar and the prosecution may proceed. If the case is not so restored to the calendar during the period fixed by the court, the accusatory instrument is, at the expiration of such period, deemed to have been dismissed.
3. Upon or after dismissal of such charges against a defendant [not previously convicted of a crime,] the court shall order that all official records and papers, relating to the defendant's arrest and prosecution, whether on file with the court, a police agency, or the New York state division of criminal justice services, be sealed and, except as otherwise provided in paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section 160.50 of this chapter, not made available to any person or public or private agency[; except, such records shall be made available under order of a court for the purpose of determining whether, in subsequent proceedings, such person qualifies under this section for a dismissal or adjournment in contemplation of dismissal of the accusatory instrument].
4. Upon the granting of an order pursuant to subdivision three of this section, the arrest and prosecution shall be deemed a nullity and the defendant shall be restored, in contemplation of law, to the status he occupied before his arrest and prosecution.
§ 6. This act shall take effect on the sixtieth day after it shall have become a law.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to orders of adjournment in contemplation of dismissal and sealing of defendant records
Purpose or general idea of bill
The purpose of this bill is to substantially reduce the probationary period of an ACD, an to expand the sealing of records of criminal defendants during the ACD probationary period.
Summary of specific provisions
Section 1 mandates the sealing of records for criminal defendants charged with specific offenses who have successfully completed a judi- cially sanctioned drug treatment program.
Section 2 expands the definition of records a court may seal for current and prior criminal offenses.
Section 3 eliminates subjective criteria a court may rely upon in deter- mining whether to seal a defendant's criminal record. This section instructs the court to rely upon the defendant having completed a judi- cially sanctioned treatment program and consider the employment benefit to the defendant in having his or her records sealed.
Section 4 describes the circumstances under which a criminal defendant's records are unsealed.
Section 5 reduces the probationary period for ACD's in non-family offenses from up to 1 year to no more than 90 days.
Section 6 reduces the probationary period for ACD's in marihuana related criminal offense from up to 1 year to no more than 90 days. This section also expands which records can be sealed in a marihuana related criminal offense.
Section 7 notes the effective date to be sixty days after the bill's passage.
Justification
ACD's are a common place criminal sanction given to defendants for low- level criminal offenses, such as public consumption of alcohol or mari- huana related offenses. There is no public policy rationale for an up to 1 year probationary period for these low-level offenses. A shorter probationary period of no more than 90 days is consistent with the mini- mal nature of these type of criminal offenses. Also, by expanding which records a court can seal and by eliminating subjective factors a court may consider during a hearing to seal records, the legislation will result in more defendants having their ACD record sealed. Given that ACD violations can result in eviction from public housing, suspension or loss of employment, and even discharge from military service, sealing of records should occur in most of these low level offense cases.
Prior legislative history
S.7188-A of 2018 (Hoylman): Died in Codes
A.8789-A of 2017-2018 (Quart): Died in Codes/Died on 3rd Reading
Fiscal implications
None to the state
Effective date
60 days
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.