Skip to content
S366Senate2019-2020 SessionSame asA3959

Seize Vehicles for Counterfeit Goods

Official title

“Provides for the seizure and forfeiture of vehicles, vessels and aircraft used in counterfeit goods”

Sponsor Andrew J. LanzaSD-24Affects Legal
Status
In Senate Committee
Codes
Impact
7/10
Significant
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Codes

What's happening

This bill allows law enforcement to seize and forfeit vehicles, vessels, and aircraft used to transport counterfeit goods in New York.

Why it matters

  1. Targets the logistics of counterfeit operations. By allowing seizure and forfeiture of vehicles, vessels, and aircraft, the bill aims to disrupt the transportation networks that enable large-scale trafficking of counterfeit goods, making it riskier and more costly for offenders.

  2. Includes due process safeguards. The law requires district attorneys to investigate circumstances before pursuing forfeiture, mandates notification to property owners, and provides opportunities for owners to challenge forfeiture or reclaim property if they prove lack of intent or knowledge.

  3. Exempts common carriers and innocent owners. Vehicles, vessels, or aircraft used as common carriers (e.g., commercial shipping companies) in regular business, or those used without the owner's knowledge or consent, are protected from forfeiture, helping shield legitimate businesses and individuals from unjust penalties.

  4. Directs proceeds to local government. Profits from any sales of forfeited property (after expenses) go into the county’s general fund, potentially providing financial resources for local enforcement or other public uses.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Seize Vehicles for Counterfeit Goods

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Andrew J. Lanza

Senator · Senate District 24

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to codes
  2. Referred to codes

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A3959Assembly

Seize Vehicles for Counterfeits

In Assembly Committee · Codes · Sponsor David Weprin

Impact 6 · Moderate0% to pass

Full text

2 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

366

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE (Prefiled)

January 9, 2019

Introduced by Sen. LANZA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes

AN ACT to amend the penal law, in relation to the seizure and forfeiture of vehicles, vessels and aircraft used in counterfeit goods

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. The penal law is amended by adding a new article 166 to read as follows:

ARTICLE 166

SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE OF VEHICLES, VESSELS AND

AIRCRAFT USED IN COUNTERFEIT GOODS Section 166.00 Seizure and forfeiture of vehicles, vessels and aircraft

used in counterfeit goods. § 166.00 Seizure and forfeiture of vehicles, vessels and aircraft used

in counterfeit goods.

1. Any vehicle, vessel or aircraft which has been or is being used in violation of section 165.71, 165.72, or 165.73 of this title shall be seized by any peace officer, who is acting pursuant to his or her special duties, or police officer, and forfeited as provided in this section. However, such forfeiture and seizure provisions shall not apply to any vehicle, vessel or aircraft used by any person as a common carrier in the transaction of business as such common carrier.

2. The seized property shall be delivered by the police officer or peace officer having made the seizure to the custody of the district attorney of the county wherein the seizure was made, together with a report of all the facts and circumstances of the seizure.

3. It shall be the duty of the district attorney of the county wherein the seizure is made, to inquire into the facts of the seizure so reported to him or her and if it appears probable that a forfeiture has been incurred by reason of a violation of section 165.71, 165.72, or

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD03264-01-9

S. 366 2

165.73 of this title, for the determination of which the institution of proceedings in the supreme court is necessary, to cause the proper proceedings to be commenced and prosecuted, at any time after thirty days from the date of the seizure, to declare such forfeiture, unless, upon inquiry and examination, such district attorney or corporation counsel decides that such proceedings can not probably be sustained or that the ends of public justice do not require that they should be instituted or prosecuted, in which case, the district attorney or corporation counsel shall cause such seized property to be returned to the owner thereof.

4. Notice of the institution of the forfeiture proceeding shall be served either (a) personally on the owners of the seized property, or (b) by registered mail to the owners' last known address and by publication of the notice once a week for two successive weeks in a newspaper published or circulated in the county wherein the seizure was made.

5. Forfeiture shall not be adjudged where the owners establish by preponderance of the evidence that (a) the use of such seized property, in violation of section 165.71, 165.72, or 165.73 of this title, was not intentional on the part of any owner, or (b) such seized property was used in violation of section 165.71, 165.72, or 165.73 of this title, by any person other than an owner thereof, while such seized property was unlawfully in the possession of a person who acquired possession thereof in violation of the criminal laws of the United States, or of any state.

6. The district attorney or the police department having custody of the seized property, after such judicial determination of forfeiture, shall, at their discretion, either retain such seized property for the official use of their office or department, or, by a public notice of at least five days, sell such forfeited property at public sale. The net proceeds of any such sale, after deduction of the lawful expenses incurred, shall be paid into the general fund of the county wherein the seizure was made.

7. Whenever any person interested in any property which is seized and declared forfeited under the provisions of this section files with a justice of the supreme court a petition for the recovery of such forfeited property, the justice of the supreme court may restore such forfeited property upon such terms and conditions as he or she deems reasonable and just, if the petitioner establishes either of the affirmative defenses set forth in subdivision five of this section and that the petitioner was without personal or actual knowledge of the forfeiture proceeding. If the petition is filed after the sale of the forfeited property, any judgment in favor of the petitioner shall be limited to the net proceeds of such sale after deduction of the lawful expenses and costs incurred by the district attorney, police department or corporation counsel.

8. No suit or action under this section for wrongful seizure shall be instituted unless such suit or action is commenced within two years after the time when the property was seized.

§ 2. This act shall take effect on the first of November next succeeding the date on which it shall have become a law.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the penal law, in relation to the seizure and forfeiture of vehicles, vessels and aircraft used in counterfeit goods

Purpose

To provide for the seizure and forfeiture of the property used in traf- ficking in counterfeit goods.

Summary of provisions

This legislation would provide for the seizure and forfeiture of the property of trademark counterfeiters and those who traffic in counter- feit goods.

Justification

Trademark counterfeiting is a serious problem which is reportedly getting worse. The counterfeit goods trade comprises the sale of so-called knock-offs of brand-name products as well as pirated intellec- tual property, including "bootleg" DVDs. It has been estimated that this illicit trade takes billions of dollars out of the state's economy, with an annual fiscal impact of over $2.6 billion in lost revenue. This legislation would provide for the seizure and forfeiture of the property used in trafficking in counterfeit goods.

Legislative history

2018: S.2620 - Referred to Codes / A.5072 - Referred to Codes 2017: S.2620 - Passed Senate/ A.5072 - Referred to Codes 2016: S.4655 - Passed Senate/ A.661 - Referred to Codes 2015: S.4655 - Passed Senate/ A.681 - Referred to Codes 2014: S.2493 - Passed Senate/ A.681 - Referred to Codes 2013: S.2493 - Passed Senate/ A.681 - Referred to Codes 2012: S.4373 - Passed Senate/ A.3799 - Referred to Codes 2011: S.4373 - Passed Senate/A.2799 - Referred to Codes 2010: S.2623 - Referred to Codes/ A.11192 - Referred to Codes

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

The first day of November next succeeding the date on which it shall have become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.