Skip to content
S3751Senate2019-2020 SessionSame asA405

Limit Therapy Copays

Official title

“Provides that no policy of group accident, group health or group accident and health shall impose copayments for physical or occupational therapy greater than copays for similar services provided by a physician”

Sponsor Neil D. BreslinSD-44+12 co-sponsorsAffects Finance
Status
In Senate Committee
Insurance
Impact
6/10
Moderate
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Insurance

What's happening

This bill prohibits insurers from charging higher copays or coinsurance for physical or occupational therapy than for primary care office visits for similar conditions.

Why it matters

  1. Removes financial barriers to rehabilitation. By capping patient cost-sharing for physical and occupational therapy at the same level as primary care visits for similar conditions, the bill aims to make these therapies more affordable and accessible, reducing out-of-pocket expenses that could otherwise deter patients from seeking needed care.

  2. Promotes equal treatment for similar health needs. The legislation prevents insurers from charging higher copays or coinsurance for therapy services—even if different medical terminology is used for the diagnosis—helping to ensure that patients with comparable health issues are not penalized for the type of provider they see.

  3. Supports continuity and adherence to care plans. Lowering financial hurdles may lead to improved patient compliance with prescribed therapy regimens, which is crucial for recovery from injuries or managing chronic conditions, potentially leading to better health outcomes and reduced long-term healthcare costs.

  4. Addresses insurance plan inconsistencies. The bill closes loopholes that allow disparate cost-sharing practices across insurance products, creating more uniform protections for New Yorkers regardless of their insurer or specific policy type.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

  • Patients receiving physical or occupational therapy

    The bill would cap copayments and coinsurance for each therapy service date at the amount charged for a primary care physician or osteopath office visit for the same or a similar diagnosed condition.

  • Licensed physical and occupational therapists

    The bill would prevent covered policies from imposing higher patient cost-sharing for their services than for comparable primary care visits, even when the condition is described differently.

  • Health insurers

    The bill would require affected policies to comply with the therapy cost-sharing limits beginning 180 days after it becomes law.

Headline styles

Limit Therapy Copays

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

History

  1. Referred to insurance
  2. Referred to insurance

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A405Assembly

Limit Therapy Copays

In Assembly Committee · Insurance · Sponsor Kevin Cahill

Impact 6 · Moderate0% to pass

Full text

3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

3751

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

February 13, 2019

Introduced by Sens. BRESLIN, AMEDORE, HELMING, KENNEDY, PARKER, ROBACH, SEPULVEDA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Insurance

AN ACT to amend the insurance law, in relation to physical therapy services

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Paragraph 23 of subsection (i) of section 3216 of the insurance law, as added by chapter 593 of the laws of 2000, is amended to read as follows:

(23) If a policy provides for reimbursement for physical and occupational therapy service which is within the lawful scope of practice of a duly licensed physical or occupational therapist, an insured shall be entitled to reimbursement for such service whether the said service is performed by a physician or through a duly licensed physical or occupational therapist, provided however, that nothing contained herein shall be construed to impair any terms of such policy including appropriate utilization review and the requirement that said service be performed pursuant to a medical order, or a similar or related service of a physician. An insurer shall not impose a copayment or coinsurance amount charged to the insured for services rendered for each date of service by a physical therapist licensed under article one hundred thirty-six of the education law or an occupational therapist licensed under article one hundred fifty-six of the education law that is greater than the copayment or coinsurance amount imposed on the insured for services provided to the insured for an office visit for the service of a licensed primary care physician or osteopath for the same or a similar diagnosed condition even if a different nomenclature is used to describe the condition for which the services are provided.

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD01964-01-9

S. 3751 2

§ 2. Subparagraph (A) of paragraph 1 of subsection (f) of section 4235 of the insurance law is amended by adding a new clause (iii) to read as follows:

(iii) a policy shall not impose a copayment or coinsurance amount charged to the insured for services rendered for each date of service by a physical therapist licensed under article one hundred thirty-six of the education law or an occupational therapist licensed under article one hundred fifty-six of the education law that is greater than the copayment or coinsurance amount imposed on the insured for services provided to the insured for an office visit for the service of a licensed primary care physician or osteopath for the same or a similar diagnosed condition even if a different nomenclature is used to describe the condition for which the services are provided.

§ 3. Subparagraph (A) of paragraph 4 of subsection (f) of section 4235 of the insurance law, as amended by chapter 593 of the laws of 2000, is amended to read as follows:

(A) any physical and occupational therapy service which is within the lawful scope of practice of a licensed physical and occupational therapist, a subscriber to such policy shall be entitled to reimbursement for such service, whether the said service is performed by a physician or licensed physical and occupational therapist pursuant to prescription or referral by a physician. A policy shall not impose a copayment or coinsurance amount charged to the insured for services rendered for each date of service by a physical therapist licensed under article one hundred thirty-six of the education law or an occupational therapist licensed under article one hundred fifty-six of the education law that is greater than the copayment or coinsurance amount imposed on the insured for services provided to the insured for an office visit for the service of a licensed primary care physician or osteopath for the same or a similar diagnosed condition even if a different nomenclature is used to describe the condition for which the services are provided;

§ 4. Subparagraph (G) of paragraph 1 of subsection (b) of section 4301 of the insurance law, as amended by chapter 593 of the laws of 2000, is amended to read as follows:

(G) physical and occupational therapy care provided through licensed physical and occupational therapists upon the prescription of a physician, provided, however, that no copayment or coinsurance amount charged to the insured for services rendered for each date of service by a physical therapist licensed under article one hundred thirty-six of the education law or an occupational therapist licensed under article one hundred fifty-six of the education law is greater than the copayment or coinsurance amount imposed on the insured for services provided to the insured for an office visit for the service of a licensed primary care physician or osteopath for the same or a similar diagnosed condition even if a different nomenclature is used to describe the condition for which the services are provided,

§ 5. Paragraph 13 of subsection (b) of section 4322 of the insurance law, as added by chapter 504 of the laws of 1995, is amended to read as follows:

(13) Outpatient physical therapy up to ninety visits per condition per calendar year, provided, however, that no copayment or coinsurance amount charged to the insured for services rendered for each date of service by a physical therapist licensed under article one hundred thirty-six of the education law or an occupational therapist licensed under article one hundred fifty-six of the education law is greater than the copayment or coinsurance amount imposed on the insured for services

S. 3751 3

provided to the insured for an office visit for the service of a licensed primary care physician or osteopath for the same or a similar diagnosed condition even if a different nomenclature is used to describe the condition for which the services are provided.

§ 6. This act shall take effect on the one hundred eightieth day after it shall have become a law.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the insurance law, in relation to physical therapy services

Purpose

To limit the imposition of co-payments for physical therapy services to no more than twenty percent of the reimbursement to the provider of care.

Summary of provisions

Sections 1 through 5 prohibit payors from imposing costs on insureds for the provision of physical therapy services in excess of 20 percent of the reimbursement to the provider of care.

Section 6. Effective Date.

Justification

This bill will protect consumers by prohibiting plans from inappropri- ately shifting the cost of physical therapy care to consumers by limit- ing co-payments to no more than 20 percent of the total reimbursement to the provider of care. Under existing law, health plans must cover phys- ical therapy services. Despite that requirement, health plans have shifted the vast majority of the cost of physical therapy services by imposing increasingly high co-payments on consumers. Under certain health plans, co-payments for physical therapy services have exceeded the reimbursement paid by the plan to the provider of care.

This cost shift has imposed a financial burden on consumers, and it has restricted access to physical therapy services. Consumers frequently cannot afford the cost imposed by these copayments for medically neces- sary physical therapy care. physical therapy services generally require multiple visits over the healing process. A co-payment of $50 for a physical therapy plan of care of 3 times a week for a month will cost the consumer $600 in out-of-pocket expenses which is beyond the means of many consumers. As a result, New Yorkers are forgoing medically neces- sary care running the risk of worsening the underlying condition or risking re-injury.

This bill would reestablish the obligation of health plans to cover the expense of physical therapy services by limiting co-payments to no more than twenty percent of the total reimbursement to the provider of care. The 20 percent limitation will allow plans to require co-payments that discourage inappropriate care but will prohibit plans from inappropri- ately shifting the cost of physical therapy care to consumers.

Legislative history

2009-2010 A.8171-A Referred to Insurance

2011-2012 S.4870A/A.187A

2013-2014 S.2319A/A.1666A 2015-2016 S.28A/A.1063A

2017-2018 S.5764A / A.569A

Fiscal implications

None

Effective date

180 days after it shall have become a law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.