Skip to content
S425Senate2019-2020 SessionSame asA2176

Protect Court Participants from Arrest

Official title

“Exempts certain interested parties or people from civil arrest while going to, remaining at, or returning from the place of such court proceeding”

Sponsor Brad Hoylman-SigalSD-27+35 co-sponsorsAffects Legal
Status
Senate Floor Calendar
Impact
7/10
Significant
Outcome
Companion signed

Bill progress

Signed via A2176

What's happening

The "Protect Our Courts Act" prohibits civil arrests of parties or witnesses attending court without a judicial warrant, ensuring court access and safety.

Why it matters

  1. Expands legal protections. The bill creates a legal privilege shielding parties, witnesses, and their family/household members from civil arrest while traveling to, attending, or leaving court, unless a judicial warrant or order specifically authorizes the arrest. This aims to ensure that people are not deterred from participating in the legal process due to fear of arrest for unrelated civil matters (including immigration enforcement).

  2. Creates accountability and remedies. Anyone unlawfully arrested in violation of these protections can bring a civil action for relief, and the Attorney General is empowered to sue on behalf of the state. Successful plaintiffs are entitled to recover legal costs and attorney’s fees, which makes enforcing these rights more feasible for vulnerable individuals.

  3. Mandates new court procedures. Law enforcement agents intending to make civil arrests in state courthouses must identify themselves, state their purpose, and present any warrant or order for judicial review. The law requires court personnel to keep detailed records of such actions and report them annually, increasing transparency and oversight of law enforcement activity in courts.

  4. Limits exceptions and clarifies definitions. The act clearly defines what constitutes a civil arrest (excluding actions for criminal prosecution or contempt of court) and specifies that it does not restrict court personnel from maintaining safety and order, nor does it diminish any preexisting common law privileges against civil arrest. This precision aims to prevent loopholes or misuse while upholding the intent of court accessibility and safety.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

  • Court parties, potential witnesses and their families or household members

    The bill would protect those attending proceedings in good faith from civil arrest while traveling to, attending or returning from court, unless authorized by a judicial warrant or order.

  • Law enforcement agencies

    Officers entering courthouses to observe or take someone into custody would have to identify themselves, disclose their purpose and provide any arrest warrant or order for review.

  • Judges and Unified Court System personnel

    The bill would authorize protective court orders and require procedures for reviewing enforcement actions, documenting courthouse activity and reporting arrest-warrant statistics annually.

  • New York attorney general and people facing prohibited civil arrests

    The bill would allow them to seek equitable and declaratory relief for actual or threatened violations, with costs and reasonable attorney’s fees available in successful actions.

Headline styles

Protect Court Participants from Arrest

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

History

  1. Substituted by A2176A
  2. Ordered to third reading cal.759
  3. Reported and committed to rules
  4. Referred to codes
  5. Print number 425a
  6. Amend and recommit to codes
  7. Referred to codes

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A2176Assembly

Protect Courtgoers From Arrests

Signed by Governor · Sponsor Michaelle C. Solages

Impact 7 · SignificantSigned into law

Full text

4 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

425--A

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE (Prefiled)

January 9, 2019

Introduced by Sens. HOYLMAN, BENJAMIN, BIAGGI, COMRIE, GIANARIS, GOUNARDES, JACKSON, KAPLAN, KAVANAGH, KRUEGER, LIU, MONTGOMERY, MYRIE, PARKER, PERSAUD, RAMOS, RIVERA, SALAZAR, SEPULVEDA, SERRANO, STAVISKY, THOMAS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Codes -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee

AN ACT to amend the civil rights law and the judiciary law, in relation to protecting certain interested parties or people from civil arrest while going to, remaining at, or returning from the place of such court proceeding

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "protect our courts act".

§ 2. The civil rights law is amended by adding a new section 28 to read as follows:

§ 28. Civil arrest; certain locations. 1. A person duly and in good faith attending a court proceeding in which such person is a party or potential witness, or a family or household member is a party or potential witness, is privileged from civil arrest while going to, remaining at, and returning from, the place of such court proceeding, unless such civil arrest is supported by a judicial warrant or judicial order authorizing such civil arrest.

2. It is a contempt of the court and false imprisonment for any person to willfully violate subdivision one of this section, or an order of the court issued pursuant to section four-a of the judiciary law, by executing an arrest prohibited by subdivision one of this section or section four-a of the judiciary law, or willfully assisting an arrest prohibited by subdivision one of this section or section four-a of the judiciary

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD05356-08-9

S. 425--A 2

law; provided, however, that nothing in this subdivision shall affect any right or defense of any person, police officer, peace officer or public officer pursuant to article thirty-five of the penal law, or any unified court system personnel acting lawfully pursuant to their duty to maintain safety and order in the courts.

3. Regardless of whether a proceeding for contempt of the court pursuant to subdivision two of this section has been initiated:

(a) a person described in subdivision one of this section may bring a civil action for appropriate equitable and declaratory relief if such person has reasonable cause to believe a violation of subdivision one of this section, as described in subdivision two of this section, or a violation of section four-a of the judiciary law, has occurred or may occur; and

(b) the attorney general may bring a civil action in the name of the people of the state of New York to obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief if the attorney general has reasonable cause to believe that a violation of subdivision one of this section, as described in subdivision two of this section, or a violation of section four-a of the judiciary law, has occurred or may occur.

4. In any successful action pursuant to subdivision three of this section, a plaintiff or petitioner may recover costs and reasonable attorney's fees.

5. Nothing in this section shall be construed to narrow, or in any way lessen, any common law or other right or privilege of a person privileged from arrest pursuant to this article or otherwise.

6. As used in this section:

(a) "civil arrest" shall mean an arrest that is not:

(i) for the sole or primary purpose of preparing the person subject to such arrest for criminal prosecution, for an alleged violation of the criminal law of:

(A) this state, or another state, for which a sentence of a term of imprisonment is authorized by law; or

(B) the United States, for which a sentence of a term of imprisonment is authorized by law, and for which federal law requires an initial appearance before a federal judge, federal magistrate or other judicial officer, pursuant to the federal rules of criminal procedure that govern initial appearances; or

(ii) for contempt of the court in which the court proceeding is taking place or will be taking place;

(b) "court proceeding" shall mean any appearance in a court of this state before a judge or justice or judicial magistrate of this state ordered or scheduled by such judge or justice or judicial magistrate, or the filing of papers designed to initiate such an appearance before a judge or justice or judicial magistrate of this state;

(c) "family or household member" shall have the same meaning as in subdivision two of section four hundred fifty-nine-a of the social services law; and

(d) "judicial warrant or judicial order authorizing such civil arrest" means an arrest warrant or other judicial order, issued by a magistrate sitting in the judicial branch of a local or state government or of the federal government, authorizing a civil arrest and issued by the court in which proceedings following such arrest will be heard and determined.

7. No action or proceeding may be commenced pursuant to this section against the unified court system or any unified court system personnel acting lawfully pursuant to their duty to maintain safety and order in the courts.

S. 425--A 3

§ 3. The judiciary law is amended by adding a new section 4-a to read as follows:

§ 4-a. Certain powers of the courts regarding civil arrests. In order to maintain access to the court and open judicial proceedings for all persons in their individual capacity and to prevent interference with the needs of judicial administration, a court has the power to issue appropriate judicial orders to protect the privilege from civil arrest, in accordance with article three of the civil rights law.

§ 4. Subdivision 2 of section 212 of the judiciary law is amended by adding a new paragraph (aa) to read as follows:

(aa) (i) In order to maintain access to the court and open judicial proceedings for all persons in their individual capacity and to prevent interference with the needs of judicial administration, consistent with section twenty-eight of the civil rights law and section four-a of this chapter, shall promulgate rules to ensure the following:

(A) any representative of a law enforcement agency who, while acting in an official capacity, enters a New York state courthouse intending to observe an individual or take an individual into custody shall identify himself or herself to uniformed court personnel and state his or her specific law enforcement purpose and the proposed enforcement action to be taken; any such representative who has a warrant or order concerning such intended arrest shall provide a copy of such warrant or order to such court personnel;

(B) any such warrant or order concerning such intended enforcement action shall be promptly reviewed by a judge or court attorney;

(C) information about any such proposed enforcement action shall be transmitted to and reviewed by appropriate court system personnel, including the judge presiding over any case involving the subject of that enforcement action;

(D) except in extraordinary circumstances, no arrest may be made by a representative of a law enforcement agency in a courtroom absent leave of the court;

(E) no civil arrest shall be executed inside a New York state courthouse except pursuant to a judicial warrant or judicial order authorizing the arrest;

(F) an unusual occurrence report shall be filed by court system personnel for every enforcement action taken inside the courthouse, including the observation of court proceedings by a representative of a law enforcement agency acting in such person's official capacity; and

(G) copies of all judicial warrants and judicial orders authorizing an arrest and provided to court personnel pursuant to this paragraph and the rules promulgated thereunder shall be maintained by the chief administrator in a central record repository, appropriately indexed or filed alphabetically by name.

(ii) The chief administrator shall publish on the unified court system website and provide to the governor, the speaker of the assembly and the temporary president of the senate an annual report compiling statistics, aggregated by county, setting forth the date each such judicial warrant or judicial order was signed, the judge and court which issued such judicial warrant or judicial order and the location of such court as shown by such document, the date such judicial warrant or judicial order was presented to counsel for the unified court system, a description of the type of judicial warrant or judicial order and, to the extent known to court personnel, whether or not an arrest occurred with respect to such warrant and the date and specific location of such arrest.

S. 425--A 4

§ 5. Severability clause. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or part of this act shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the legislature that this act would have been enacted even if such invalid provisions had not been included herein.

§ 6. This act shall take effect immediately.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the civil rights law and the judiciary law, in relation to protecting certain interested parties or people from civil arrest while going to, remaining at, or returning from the place of such court proceeding

Purpose or general idea of bill

The purpose of this bill is to facilitate continued access to the justice system and courts by all members of the community without fear of immigration-related consequences.

Summary of provisions

Section one is the title of the bill.

Read the full memo (925 words)

Section two would amend the Civil Rights Law to protect certain persons from civil arrest when going to, remaining at, or returning from a court appearance or .proceeding unless a specific judicial warrant or judicial order authorizing such arrest has been issued. This section provides that a civil court action may be brought by the individual or the attor- ney general to address an alleged violation of this provision. This provision is in addition to the general protections from civil arrest found in Article Three of the Civil Rights Law, in any other law, and available under common. law.

Section three would amend the.Judiciary.Law to allow courts to issue orders designed to protect the prohibition on such civil arrests,

Section four would amend the Judiciary Law direct the Office of Court Administration to promulgate rules to ensure that, among other things: any representatives of a law enforcement agency acting in their official capacity shall identify themselves And their specific law enforcement purpose and proposed enforcement action when entering a New York State courthouse intending to observe an individual or take an individual into custody; except in extraordinary circumstances, that no arrest may be made in a courtroom absent leave of the court; and that no civil arrest shall be executed inside a New York State courthouse except pursuant to a judicial warrant or order.

Section five contains a severability clause. Section six is the effec- tive date.

Justification

Article Three of the Civil Rights Law, "Privilege From Arrest," dates back to the early part of the last century. Most of these provisions of the Civil Rights Law were enacted in 1909 (e.g., § 22 ("Privileges of officers and prisoners from arrest while passing through another coun- ty"); § 23 ("No person to be arrested in civil proceedings without a statutory provision); § 25 ("Witness exempt from arrest")). While such provisions have been effective to protect the integrity and needs of the court system in certain circumstances, certain modern practices make an updated, supplementary statute necessary. Changes by federal agencies regarding the enforcement of federal immigration law have instilled significant fear in immigrant communities across New York State. In particular, the use of court calendars and courthouses as a means of locating allegedly undocumented individuals has soared, leaving many immigrants, documented and undocumented, afraid to access the justice system or respond to court summonses for fear of potentially life-chang- ing immigration-related repercussions. This trend has a potentially damaging impact on all New Yorkers, not just immigrant communities, as the operation of our judicial system and public safety are undermined.

Domestic violence victims - whether documented individuals or not - need access to our civil justice system, for orders of protection and similar relief. An entire family may be gravely impacted if a tenant is afraid to enter the courthouse and respond to a landlord's court petition. Justice to other persons is denied when an immigrant - documented or not - refuses to come to court to testify as a victim or witness. It serves neither justice nor public safety when fear of a civil arrest deters a defendant charged with a traffic infraction, or a more serious crime, from attending a scheduled court appearance in the case.

According to the Immigrant Defense Project, from 2016 to 2017, arrests by federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement ("ICE") agents at court- houses in New York State increased by 1200%. Fear of being targeted, either due to a lack of legal immigration status or concern about the uncertain status of a family member, have dissuaded many individuals from contacting law enforcement or following through with court proceedings. District attorneys and legal representatives, in New York and elsewhere, have expressed frustration and concern regarding their ability to prosecute cases, as victims and witnesses are sometimes too afraid to attend the proceedings. This inability of law enforcement and the legal community to work effectively with immigrant communities and individuals has potentially severe consequences for public safety, as the justice system is handicapped by the unwillingness of victims, witnesses, tenants and others to come forward and enter the courthouse.

As fewer individuals feel safe interacting with the justice system, fearing potential implications for themselves, friends or family, it becomes all the more challenging to promote public safety. It is imper- ative that we ensure that all members of our community feel safe access- ing New York's court system.

This bill would make a modest change to clarify and update New York's century-old prohibition on certain courthouse arrests (Civil Rights Law Art. 3). The bill would allow arrest for an immigration offense based on a judicial arrest warrant or judicial order, signed by a judge of anoth- er jurisdiction who is authorized to order such arrest.

However, an immigration - related courthouse arrest based on an adminis- trative warrant, or without a warrant, would not be permitted.

Prior legislative history

2018: S.8925 (Alcantara) - Died in Rules

Fiscal implications for state and local governments

None expected.

Effective date

This bill would take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.