What's happening
This bill requires state contracts to only use net-neutral internet service providers and creates a fund to support municipal ISPs.
Why it matters
Mandates transparency from ISPs. Internet service providers operating in New York must annually disclose their network management practices, service performance, and commercial terms. This empowers consumers to make informed choices and enables fair competition among content and service providers.
Defines net neutrality in state law. The bill explicitly adopts the FCC’s 2015 Open Internet Order as the standard for net neutrality, providing a clear legal benchmark for what constitutes a compliant ISP. This could influence how disputes and enforcement are handled if federal policy changes.
Shifts public funds and contracts to compliant ISPs. By prohibiting state and local governments from contracting with ISPs that do not adhere to net neutrality (when viable alternatives exist), the bill exerts significant economic pressure on providers to maintain open internet practices, potentially influencing the broader market beyond state contracts.
Establishes substantial state support for municipal broadband. The creation of a $250 million revolving loan fund to help municipalities set up their own ISPs could increase public-owned broadband options, foster local competition, and expand high-speed internet access—especially in underserved or rural communities. This could have long-term impacts on affordability and service quality statewide.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Require Net Neutral Internet Providers
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
History
- Referred to finance
- Referred to finance
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Require Net Neutrality for ISPs
In Assembly Committee · Corporations, Authorities And Commissions · Sponsor Kevin Cahill
Full text
4 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
4368
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
March 11, 2019
Introduced by Sens. PARKER, BAILEY, BROOKS, KAMINSKY, KRUEGER, MONTGOM- ERY, PERSAUD, SEPULVEDA, STAVISKY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Finance
AN ACT to amend the public service law and the state finance law, in relation to state contracts being only with internet service providers compliant with net neutrality and establishes a revolving fund for the establishment of municipal internet service providers; and making an appropriation therefor
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "NYS Net Neutrality Protection Act".
§ 2. Subdivision 1 of section 5 of the public service law is amended by adding a new paragraph i to read as follows:
i. To every broadband internet line which lies wholly within the state and that part within the state of New York of every broadband internet line which lies partly within and partly without the state and to the persons or corporations owning, leasing or operating any such broadband internet line.
§ 3. Section 5 of the public service law is amended by adding a new subdivision 7 to read as follows:
7. The commission shall require any person engaged in the provision of broadband internet access service in New York state to report to the commission, and publicly disclose annually, accurate information regarding the network management practices, performance, and commercial terms of its broadband internet access services sufficient for consumers to make informed choices regarding use of such services and for content, application, service, and device providers to develop, market, and maintain internet offerings.
§ 4. Subdivision 1 of section 165 of the state finance law is amended by adding three new paragraphs f, g and h to read as follows:
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD03122-01-9
S. 4368 2
f. A "net neutral source of internet services" shall mean an internet service provider who adheres to the principles of net neutrality.
g. A "non-net neutral source of internet services" shall mean an internet service provider who violates any of the principles of net neutrality.
h. "The principles of net neutrality" shall mean the rules and regulations under the open internet report and order on remand, declaratory ruling, and order by the federal communications commission released March twelfth, two thousand fifteen, GN Docket No. 14-28.
§ 5. Section 165 of the state finance law is amended by adding a new subdivision 9 to read as follows:
9. Prohibition on purchase of internet services from a non-net neutral source of internet services.
a. (i) With respect to contracts described in subparagraphs (ii) and (iii) of this paragraph, and in accordance with such subparagraphs, the state and any governmental agency or political subdivision or public benefit corporation or municipality of the state shall not contract for the supply of internet services with any contractor who does not agree to stipulate to the following, if there is another contractor who will contract to supply internet services of comparable quality at a comparable price or cost, the contractor and any individual or legal entity in which the contractor holds a ten percent or greater ownership interest and any individual or legal entity that holds a ten percent or greater ownership interest in the contractor shall make lawful steps in good faith to conduct any business operations as a net neutral source of internet services.
(ii) In the case of contracts let by a competitive process, whenever the responsive and responsible offerer having the lowest price or best value offer has not agreed to stipulate to the conditions set forth in this subdivision and another responsive and responsible offerer who has agreed to stipulate to such conditions has submitted an offer shall determine that the contract be awarded to the lowest price or best value offer for internet services from a net neutral source of internet services.
(iii) In the case of contracts let by other than a competitive process internet services involving an expenditure of an amount greater than the discretionary buying threshold as specified in section one hundred sixty-three of this article, the contracting entity shall not award to a proposed contractor who has not agreed to stipulate to the conditions set forth in this subdivision unless the entity seeking to use the internet services determines that the internet services are necessary for the entity to perform its functions and there is no other responsible contractor who will supply internet services of comparable quality at a comparable price. Such determinations shall be made in writing and shall be public documents.
b. Upon receiving information that a contractor who has made the stipulation required by this subdivision is in violation thereof, the contracting entity shall review such information and offer the contractor an opportunity to respond. If the contracting entity finds that a violation has occurred, it shall take such action as may be appropriate and provided for by law, rule or contract, including, but not limited to, imposing sanctions, seeking compliance, recovering damages or declaring the contractor in default.
c. As used in this subdivision, the term "contract" shall not include contracts with governmental and non-profit organizations, contracts awarded pursuant to emergency procurement procedures or contracts,
S. 4368 3
resolutions, indentures, declarations of trust or other instruments authorizing or relating to the authorization, issuance, award, sale or purchase of bonds, certificates of indebtedness, notes or other fiscal obligations, provided that the policies of this subdivision shall be considered when selecting a contractor to provide financial or legal advice, and when selecting managing underwriters in connection with such activities.
d. The provisions of this subdivision shall not apply to contracts for which the state or other contracting entity receives funds administered by the United States, except to the extent congress has directed to not withhold funds from states and localities that choose to implement selective purchasing policies based on an agreement to comply with the principles of net neutrality, or to the extent that such funds are not otherwise withheld by congress.
§ 6. The state finance law is amended by adding a new section 99-ff to read as follows:
§ 99-ff. Municipal internet service provider revolving loan fund. 1. There is hereby established in the joint custody of the comptroller and the public service commission a fund to be known as the "municipal internet service provider revolving loan fund". Such fund shall consist of moneys made available pursuant to appropriation and any other sources in order to provide support for municipalities attempting to create their own internet service provider.
2. The account shall consist of all moneys appropriated for its purpose, all moneys transferred to such account pursuant to law, and all moneys required by this section or any other law to be paid into or credited to this account, including all moneys received by the account or donated to it, payments of principal and interest on loans made from the account, and any interest earnings which may accrue from the investment or reinvestment of moneys from the account.
3. Moneys of the account, when allocated, shall be available to the public service commission to make loans as provided in this section. Up to five percent of the moneys of the account or two hundred fifty thousand dollars, whichever is less, may be used to pay the expenses, including personal service and maintenance and operation, in connection with the administration of such loans.
4. (a) The public service commission may make, upon application duly made, up to the amounts available by appropriation, loans for any and all costs associated with the creation of a municipally owned broadband internet service provider.
(b) The public service commission shall have the power to make such rules and regulations as may be necessary and proper to effectuate the purposes of this section.
5. (a) Application for loans may be made by a town, village, city or county provided that the application is otherwise consistent with its respective powers. Applications may also be submitted jointly by multiple applicants provided that the application is otherwise consistent with each applicant's respective powers.
(b) Every application shall be in a form acceptable to the public service commission. Every application shall accurately reflect the conditions which give rise to the proposed expenditure and accurately reflect the ability of the applicant to make such an expenditure without the proceeds of a loan under this section.
(c) (i) The public service commission shall give preference to those applications which demonstrate the greatest need, joint applications, and to those applications the proceeds of which will be applied toward
S. 4368 4
attaining compliance with federal and state laws and may disapprove any application which contains no adequate demonstration of need or which would result in inequitable or inefficient use of the moneys in the account.
(ii) In making determinations on loan applications, the public service commission shall assure that loan fund moneys are equitably distributed among all geographical areas of the state.
(d) The public service commission shall, to the maximum extent feasible, and consistent with the other provisions of this section, seek to provide that loans authorized by this section reflect an appropriate geographic distribution, are distributed equitably and encourage regional cooperation.
§ 7. The sum of two hundred fifty million dollars ($250,000,000), or so much thereof as may be necessary, is hereby appropriated from any moneys in the state treasury in the general fund to the credit of the state purposes account for the initial capital of the municipal internet service provider revolving loan fund in carrying out the provisions of this act. Such sum shall be payable on the audit and warrant of the state comptroller on vouchers certified or approved in the manner provided by law. No expenditure shall be made from this appropriation until a certificate of approval of availability shall have been issued by the director of the budget and filed with the state comptroller and a copy filed with the chairman of the senate finance committee and the chairman of the assembly ways and means committee. Such certificate may be amended from time to time by the director of the budget and a copy of each such amendment shall be filed with the state comptroller, the chairman of the senate finance committee and the chairman of the assembly ways and means committee.
§ 8. This act shall take effect immediately.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the public service law and the state finance law, in relation to state contracts being only with internet service providers compliant with net neutrality and establishes a revolving fund for the establishment of municipal internet service providers; and making an appropriation therefor
Purpose or general idea of bill
The purpose of this bill is to retain the policy of net neutrality at a State level and to add an appropriation, which would provide a revolving loan fund for any municipality that has a noncomplying ISP in its envi- rons to be able to borrow the capital to build a competing network.
Summary of provisions
Section 1: This act shall be known and may be cited as the "NYS Net Neutrality Protection Act"
Read the full memo (797 words)
Subsection 2 of Section 5 of the Public service law is amended by adding a new paragraph (i)
Subsection 3 of section 5 of the Public service law is amended by adding a new paragraph subdivision 7
Subsection 4, subdivision 1 of Section 165 of the state finance law is amended by adding three new paragraphs (f), (g), and (h)
Subsection 5: Section 165 of the state finance law is amended by adding a new subdivision 9
Subsection 6: The state finance law is amended by adding a new section 99-bb
Subsection 7: the sum of two hundred fifty million dollars or so much thereof as may necessary is hereby appropriated from any moneys in the state treasury in the general fund to the credit of the state purposes account for the initial capital of the municipal interest service provider revolving loan fund in carrying out the provisions of this act. Such sum shall be payable on the audit and warrant of the state comp- troller on vouchers certified or approved in the manner provided by law. No expenditure shall be made from this appropriation until a certificate of approval of availability shall have been issued by the director of the budget and filed with the state comptroller and a copy filed with the chairman of the Senate finance committee and the chairman of the assembly ways and means committee. Such certificate may be amended from time to time by the director of the budget and a copy of each such amendment shall be filed with the state comptroller, the chairman of the senate finance committee and the chairman of the assembly ways and means committee.
Subsection 8: Sets forth the effective date.
Justification
Neutrality has been a core democratizing principle of the Internet since its inception. Net Neutrality is the cornerstone idea of the worldwide web that all internet data should be equal. Internet Service Providers (ISP) should not be allowed to charge different companies more or less for their data or to slow down, or block access to web sites and services they do not like. Internet service is a telecommunications service, no different from phone service. Phone companies, which are often the same companies that are ISPs, cannot make the connection worse if they do not approve of the caller on the other end of a call.
Both Freedom of Speech issues and fair competition issues arise with the FCC decision to do away with the 2010 provisions of the law. The FCC's recent vote will make it easier for ISPs to change the nature of the internet, making some websites and services cheaper and more easily accessible, and others harder or more expensive to access. If major corporations could pay to get special treatment-faster speeds, more bandwidth- start-ups would be at a disadvantage. Hence, net neutrality protects innovation as well because without it, small business entrepre- neurs will not survive. These small businesses constitute the majority of the businesses in every region of the State - comprising at least 90 percent of total businesses in each region.
The deregulation of the internet will lead to a multitude of issues. We have seen this before with the deregulation of airlines and banks. Unleashing the airlines to set their own fares and routes created over- crowded planes, cramped seats, overstuffed luggage bins and absorbent fares. Deregulation of banking allowed widespread abuses that triggered the meltdown in the financial markets in 2008 and crashed the American economy with reverberating effect.
This bill, through the State Treasury, allows municipalities to create their own internet services for constituents in areas where Internet Service Providers are non-compliant with 2010 Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Net Neutrality rules. It will create a competitive and stabilizing effect on the telecommunications market and protect our most cherished rights.
Prior legislative history
s.k 1 2017-18: S7175A - AMENDED (T) AND RECOMMIT TO FINANCE
Fiscal implications for state and local governments
None noted.
Effective date
This act shall take effect immediately.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.