What's happening
This bill allows Jonathan Grossman to apply for a recalculation of his New York City teachers' retirement benefits to include unused vacation pay.
Why it matters
Establishes a rare exception. This bill creates a one-time, individual exception to longstanding New York City Teachers’ Retirement System (TRS) rules, allowing a retiree to have unused vacation pay included in his pension calculation—something not generally permitted for other TRS retirees.
Retroactive financial impact. If enacted, Jonathan Grossman’s recalculated benefits would apply both prospectively and retroactively to his 2010 retirement date, potentially resulting in a significant lump sum payment and increased annual pension, funded entirely by New York City.
Cost and precedent considerations. The immediate cost to the City is estimated at around $234,000, recognized all at once rather than over time, raising questions about fiscal responsibility and the precedent set by granting special legislative relief to individuals.
Accountability and process issues. The bill acknowledges that the omission of vacation pay was not due to Grossman's negligence, highlighting issues of administrative error and the potential for other retirees to seek similar relief through legislative rather than administrative channels.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Recalculate Grossman's Retirement Benefits
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
No co-sponsors yet.
History
- Referred to civil service and pensions
- Recommitted to rules
- Ordered to third reading cal.1139
- Committee discharged and committed to rules
- Reported and committed to finance
- Referred to civil service and pensions
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Recalculate Grossman's Retirement Benefits
In Assembly Committee · Governmental Employees · Sponsor Daniel Rosenthal
Full text
3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
4468
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
March 12, 2019
Introduced by Sen. ADDABBO -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Civil Service and Pensions
AN ACT authorizing Jonathan Grossman to apply for a recalculation of his retirement benefits
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, Jonathan Grossman, who joined the New York city teachers' retirement system as a Tier I member on January 1, 1972, who retired from such system on September 28, 2010, and who for reasons not ascribable to his own negligence had his retirement benefits calculated without the inclusion of a lump sum payment for accumulated vacation, shall have his retirement benefits recalculated with such lump sum payments, including interest accruing from the date of retirement, if he shall file an application therefor with the state comptroller on or before one year of the effective date of this act.
§ 2. All past service costs of implementing the provisions of this act shall be borne by the city of New York.
§ 3. This act shall take effect immediately.
FISCAL NOTE.--Pursuant to Legislative Law, Section 50:
SUMMARY OF BILL: The proposed legislation would provide to Jonathan
Grossman, a retired Tier 1 member of the New York City Teacher's Retire-
ment System (TRS), an election, by filing an application with the State
Comptroller within one year of the effective date on which the proposed
legislation is passed, to have his retirement benefits recalculated to
include his lump sum payment for accumulated vacation in the calculation
of his final average salary.
Effective Date: Upon enactment.
BACKGROUND: Mr. Grossman retired as a Tier 1 TRS member on September
28, 2010. He currently receives an annual retirement allowance of
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD01047-02-9
S. 4468 2
$102,127 per year under the 50% Joint and Survivor with Pop-Up payment
option.
If the proposed legislation is passed, Mr. Grossman's retirement
allowance would be recalculated to include in his final average salary a
lump sum payment he received for unused vacation time, which is a bene-
fit that is generally not afforded TRS retirees. The additional cost,
less any required member contributions paid by Mr. Grossman, to fund the
increased retirement allowance associated with the proposed legislation
would fall upon the City of New York.
Because Tier 1 TRS members are generally permitted to take an actuari-
al reduction of their retirement allowance to account for deficits in
member contributions, for purposes of this fiscal note, it is assumed
that Mr. Grossman would not pay any owed member contributions resulting
from the recalculation. Based on this assumption and application of
other Tier 1 benefit calculation provisions, it is estimated that Mr.
Grossman's annual retirement allowance would increase to $113,146. This
annual increase would apply prospectively as well as retroactively, less
any payments previously made, to Mr. Grossman's September 28, 2010 date
of retirement.
FINANCIAL IMPACT - PRESENT VALUES: The estimated financial impact of
this proposal has been calculated based on the difference between the
present value of (1) the benefits Mr. Grossman would receive if this
proposed legislation were enacted (retroactive to his September 28, 2010
retirement date) and (2) the benefits that are currently and have been
paid to Mr. Grossman.
Based on the actuarial assumptions and methods described herein, the
enactment of this proposed legislation would increase the Present Value
of Future Benefits (PVFB) and the Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) of
TRS by approximately $234,000 as of June 30, 2019.
FINANCIAL IMPACT - ANNUAL EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS: In accordance with
Administrative Code of the City of New York (ACCNY) Section
13-638.2(k-2), new UAL attributable to benefit changes are to be amor-
tized as determined by the Actuary but generally over the remaining
working lifetime of those impacted by the benefit changes.
For purposes of this Fiscal Note, since Mr. Grossman is retired and
collecting a pension, and therefore has no remaining working lifetime,
the entire increase in UAL (or PVFB) would be recognized immediately.
OTHER COSTS: Not measured in this Fiscal Note are the following:
* The initial, additional administrative costs of TRS and other New
York City agencies to implement the proposed legislation.
CONTRIBUTION TIMING: For the purposes of this Fiscal Note, it is
assumed that the changes in the PVFB and annual employer contributions
would be reflected for the first time in the June 30, 2019 actuarial
valuation of TRS. In accordance with the One-Year Lag Methodology (OYLM)
used to determine employer contributions, the increase in employer
contributions would be reflected in Fiscal Year 2021.
CENSUS DATA: As of June 30, 2018, Mr. Grossman was approximately age
71, and receiving a pension of $102,127 per year under the 50% Joint and
Survivor with Pop-Up payment option.
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS AND METHODS: The changes in the PVFB and annual
employer contributions presented herein have been calculated based on
the actuarial assumptions and methods adopted by the Board of Trustees
on February 28, 2019 that will be used to determine the Final Fiscal
Year 2019 employer contributions of TRS. Please note these assumptions
and methods are subject to change as this valuation is not considered
final until the end of Fiscal Year 2019.
S. 4468 3
RISK AND UNCERTAINTY: The costs presented in this Fiscal Note depend
highly on the actuarial assumptions and methods used and are subject to
change based on the realization of potential investment, demographic,
contribution, and other risks. If actual experience deviates from actu-
arial assumptions, the actual costs could differ from those presented
herein. Costs are also dependent on the actuarial methods used, and
therefore different actuarial methods could produce different results.
Quantifying these risks is beyond the scope of this Fiscal Note.
STATEMENT OF ACTUARIAL OPINION: I, Sherry S. Chan, am the Chief Actu-
ary for, and independent of, the New York City Retirement Systems and
Pension Funds. I am a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries, an Enrolled
Actuary under the Employee Retirement Income and Security Act of 1974, a
Member of the American Academy of Actuaries, and a Fellow of the Confer-
ence of Consulting Actuaries. I meet the Qualification Standards of the
American Academy of Actuaries to render the actuarial opinion contained
herein. To the best of my knowledge, the results contained herein have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted actuarial principles
and procedures and with the Actuarial Standards of Practice issued by
the Actuarial Standards Board.
FISCAL NOTE IDENTIFICATION: This Fiscal Note 2019-02 dated March 11,
2019 was prepared by the Chief Actuary for the New York City Teachers'
Retirement System. This estimate is intended for use only during the
2019 Legislative Session.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act authorizing Jonathan Grossman to apply for a recalculation of his retirement benefits
PURPOSE::
To allow for Jonathan Grossman to apply for a recalculation of his retirement benefits due to the unique circumstances surrounding his retirement.
SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS::
Section 1 provides for Jonathan Grossman to recalculate his retirement benefits with the inclusion of his lump sum for accumulated vacation, including interest from the date of retirement. Section 2 directs the City of New York to bear the cost of these provisions. Section 3 sets the effective date.
JUSTIFICATION::
Jonathan Grossman became a member of the New York City Teachers Retire- ment System (NYC TRS) as a Tier-1 Member in 1972. In 1974, Mr. Grossman gained employment with the New York City Housing and Development Admin- istration. His status as a city employee was converted to the state system in 1984 when his division within the New York City housing agency was transferred to state control of the New York State Division of Hous- ing and Community Renewal under the Omnibus Housing Act of 1983. This act allowed for transferred employees to remain with their respective city retirement systems. Upon his retirement in 2010, Mr. Grossman found that NYC TRS had not included his lump sum vacation payment towards the calculation of his Final Average Salary (FAS). While Section 431(1) of the state Retirement and Social Security Law discontinued this practice for members who joined their retirement systems after April 1, 1 972, Mr. Grossman was a member well within the time period to be eligible for this benefit. This bill would address this miscalculation and allow for Mr. Grossman to recalculate an adjustment to his FAS and pension amount.
Legislative history
This is a new bill.
Fiscal implications
Fiscal note needed, cost to be borne by New York City.
Effective date
This act shall take effect immediately.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.