Skip to content
S5734Senate2019-2020 SessionSame asA7848

Remove SUNY Charter Authority

Official title

“Relates to removing the board of trustees of the state university of New York as a charter entity; repealer”

Sponsor Robert JacksonSD-31Affects Education
Status
In Senate Committee
Education
Impact
7/10
Significant
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Education

What's happening

This bill removes the State University of New York’s authority to approve or oversee charter schools, making the Board of Regents the sole charter entity.

Why it matters

  1. Centralizes charter school oversight with the Board of Regents. , which could lead to more consistent and unified policy decisions regarding charter school approvals, renewals, and accountability across New York State.

  2. Removes SUNY’s role as a charter authorizer. , potentially impacting the diversity of charter schools and the types of educational models available, as SUNY has historically approved a significant share of charters, sometimes using different standards or priorities than the Board of Regents.

  3. Transitions all existing SUNY-authorized charters to Board of Regents supervision. , meaning current charter schools under SUNY will have a new oversight body for compliance, renewals, and possible interventions, which may affect their operational autonomy or renewal prospects.

  4. May alter the pace and nature of charter school growth. , since only one authorizer will now handle all new applications, possibly making the process more centralized but also slower or subject to different political pressures, affecting parents, educators, and communities interested in opening new charter schools.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Remove SUNY Charter Authority

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Robert Jackson

Senator · Senate District 31

Chair, Cities

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to education
  2. Referred to education

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A7848Assembly

Remove SUNY Charter Power

In Assembly Committee · Education · Sponsor Rodneyse Bichotte Hermelyn

Impact 6 · Moderate0% to pass

Full text

6 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

5734

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

May 14, 2019

Introduced by Sen. JACKSON -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Education

AN ACT to amend the education law, in relation to charter entities; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Subdivision 3 of section 2851 of the education law, as amended by chapter 101 of the laws of 2010, is amended to read as follows:

3. An applicant shall submit the application to a charter entity for approval. For purposes of this article, a charter entity shall be:

(a) The board of education of a school district eligible for an apportionment of aid under subdivision four of section thirty-six hundred two of this chapter, provided that a board of education shall not approve an application for a school to be operated outside the school district's geographic boundaries and further provided that in a city having a population of one million or more, the chancellor of any such city school district shall be the charter entity established by this paragraph; or

(b) [The board of trustees of the state university of New York; or

(c)] The board of regents.

The board of regents shall be the only entity authorized to issue a charter pursuant to this article. Notwithstanding any provision of this subdivision to the contrary, an application for the conversion of an existing public school to a charter school shall be submitted to, and may only be approved by, the charter entity set forth in paragraph (a) of this subdivision. Notwithstanding any law, rule or regulation to the contrary, any such application for conversion shall be consistent with this section but shall not be subject to the process pursuant to subdivision nine-a of section twenty-eight hundred fifty-two of this article, and the charter entity shall require that the parents or guardians of a

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD11458-01-9

S. 5734 2

majority of the students then enrolled in the existing public school vote in favor of converting the school to a charter school.

§ 1-a. Subdivision 5 of section 2851 of the education law is REPEALED.

§ 2. Paragraph (e) of subdivision 4 of section 2851 of the education law, as added by chapter 101 of the laws of 2010, is amended to read as follows:

(e) The means by which the charter school will meet or exceed enrollment and retention targets as prescribed by the board of regents [or the board of trustees of the state university of New York, as applicable,] of students with disabilities, English language learners, and students who are eligible applicants for the free and reduced price lunch program which shall be considered by the charter entity prior to approving such charter school's application for renewal. When developing such targets, the board of regents [and the board of trustees of the state university of New York] shall ensure (1) that such enrollment targets are comparable to the enrollment figures of such categories of students attending the public schools within the school district, or in a city school district in a city having a population of one million or more inhabitants, the community school district, in which the charter school is located; and (2) that such retention targets are comparable to the rate of retention of such categories of students attending the public schools within the school district, or in a city school district in a city having a population of one million or more inhabitants, the community school district, in which the proposed charter school would be located.

§ 3. Subdivision 5-b of section 2852 of the education law, as added by chapter 4 of the laws of 1998, is amended to read as follows:

5-b. If the board of regents returns a proposed charter to the charter entity pursuant to the provisions of subdivision five-a of this section, such charter entity shall reconsider the proposed charter, taking into consideration the comments and recommendation of the board of regents. Thereafter, the charter entity shall resubmit the proposed charter to the board of regents with modifications, provided that the applicant consents in writing to such modifications, resubmit the proposed charter to the board of regents without modifications, or abandon the proposed charter. The board of regents shall review each such resubmitted proposed charter in accordance with the provisions of subdivision five-a of this section[; provided, however, that it shall be the duty of the board of regents to approve and issue a proposed charter resubmitted by the charter entity described in paragraph (b) of subdivision three of section twenty-eight hundred fifty-one of this article within thirty days of the resubmission of such proposed charter or such proposed charter shall be deemed approved and issued at the expiration of such period].

§ 4. Subdivision 9 of section 2852 of the education law, as amended by section 2 of subpart A of part B of chapter 20 of the laws of 2015, is amended to read as follows:

9. The total number of charters issued pursuant to this article statewide shall not exceed four hundred sixty. (a) All charters issued on or after July first, two thousand fifteen and counted toward the numerical limits established by this subdivision shall be issued by the board of regents upon application directly to the board of regents [or on the recommendation of the board of trustees of the state university of New York] pursuant to a competitive process in accordance with subdivision nine-a of this section. Fifty of such charters issued on or after July first, two thousand fifteen, and no more, shall be granted to a charter for a school to be located in a city having a population of one million

S. 5734 3

or more. The failure of any body to issue the regulations authorized pursuant to this article shall not affect the authority of a charter entity to propose a charter to the board of regents or the board of regents' authority to grant such charter. A conversion of an existing public school to a charter school, or the renewal or extension of a charter approved by any charter entity, shall not be counted toward the numerical limits established by this subdivision.

(b) A charter that has been surrendered, revoked or terminated on or before July first, two thousand fifteen, including a charter that has not been renewed by action of its charter entity, may be reissued pursuant to paragraph (a) of this subdivision by the board of regents either upon application directly to the board of regents [or on the recommendation of the board of trustees of the state university of New York] pursuant to a competitive process in accordance with subdivision nine-a of this section. Provided that such reissuance shall not be counted toward the statewide numerical limit established by this subdivision, and provided further that no more than twenty-two charters may be reissued pursuant to this paragraph.

(c) For purposes of determining the total number of charters issued within the numerical limits established by this subdivision, the approval date of the charter entity shall be the determining factor.

(d) Notwithstanding any provision of this article to the contrary, any charter authorized to be issued by chapter fifty-seven of the laws of two thousand seven effective July first, two thousand seven, and that remains unissued as of July first, two thousand fifteen, may be issued pursuant to the provisions of law applicable to a charter authorized [to be issued] by [such] a chapter [in effect as of June fifteenth, two thousand fifteen] of the laws of two thousand nineteen that amended this section; provided however that nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to increase the numerical limit applicable to a city having a population of one million or more as provided in paragraph (a) of this subdivision, as amended by a chapter of the laws of two thousand fifteen which added this paragraph.

§ 5. Subdivision 9-a of section 2852 of the education law, as amended by section 2 of subpart A of part B of chapter 20 of the laws of 2015, is amended to read as follows:

9-a. (a) The board of regents is hereby authorized and directed to issue four hundred sixty charters statewide upon [either] applications submitted directly to the board of regents [or upon the recommendation of the board of trustees of the state university of New York] pursuant to a competitive request for proposals process.

The board of regents shall make a determination to issue a charter pursuant to a request for proposals no later than December thirty-first of each year.

(b) The board of regents [and the board of trustees of the state university of New York] shall [each] develop such request for proposals in a manner that facilitates a thoughtful review of charter school applications, considers the demand for charter schools by the community, and seeks to locate charter schools in a region or regions where there may be a lack of alternatives and access to charter schools would provide new alternatives within the local public education system that would offer the greatest educational benefit to students. Applications shall be evaluated in accordance with the criteria and objectives contained within a request for proposals. The board of regents [and the board of trustees of the state university of New York] shall not consid-

S. 5734 4

er any applications which do not rigorously demonstrate that they have met the following criteria:

(i) that the proposed charter school would meet or exceed enrollment and retention targets, as prescribed by the board of regents [or the board of trustees of the state university of New York, as applicable,] of students with disabilities, English language learners, and students who are eligible applicants for the free and reduced price lunch program. When developing such targets, the board of regents [and the board of trustees of the state university of New York,] shall ensure (1) that such enrollment targets are comparable to the enrollment figures of such categories of students attending the public schools within the school district, or in a city school district in a city having a population of one million or more inhabitants, the community school district, in which the proposed charter school would be located; and (2) that such retention targets are comparable to the rate of retention of such categories of students attending the public schools within the school district, or in a city school district in a city having a population of one million or more inhabitants, the community school district, in which the proposed charter school would be located; and

(ii) that the applicant has conducted public outreach, in conformity with a thorough and meaningful public review process prescribed by the board of regents [and the board of trustees of the state university of New York,] to solicit community input regarding the proposed charter school and to address comments received from the impacted community concerning the educational and programmatic needs of students.

(c) The board of regents [and the board of trustees of the state university of New York] shall grant priority based on a scoring rubric to those applications that best demonstrate how they will achieve the following objectives, and any additional objectives the board of regents [and the board of trustees of the state university of New York,] may prescribe:

(i) increasing student achievement and decreasing student achievement gaps in reading/language arts and mathematics;

(ii) increasing high school graduation rates and focusing on serving specific high school student populations including, but not limited to, students at risk of not obtaining a high school diploma, re-enrolled high school drop-outs, and students with academic skills below grade level;

(iii) focusing on the academic achievement of middle school students and preparing them for a successful transition to high school;

(iv) utilizing high-quality assessments designed to measure a student's knowledge, understanding of, and ability to apply, critical concepts through the use of a variety of item types and formats;

(v) increasing the acquisition, adoption, and use of local instructional improvement systems that provide teachers, principals, and administrators with the information and resources they need to inform and improve their instructional practices, decision-making, and overall effectiveness;

(vi) partnering with low performing public schools in the area to share best educational practices and innovations;

(vii) demonstrating the management and leadership techniques necessary to overcome initial start-up problems to establish a thriving, financially viable charter school;

(viii) demonstrating the support of the school district in which the proposed charter school will be located and the intent to establish an ongoing relationship with such school district.

S. 5734 5

(d) [No later than November first, two thousand ten, and of each succeeding year, after a thorough review of applications received, the board of trustees of the state university of New York shall recommend for approval to the board of regents the qualified applications that it has determined rigorously demonstrate the criteria and best satisfy the objectives contained within a request for proposals, along with supporting documentation outlining such determination.

(e)] Upon receipt of a proposed charter to be issued pursuant to this subdivision submitted by a charter entity, the board of regents [or the board of trustees of the state university of New York,] shall review, recommend and issue, as applicable, such charters in accordance with the standards established in this subdivision.

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the education law, in relation to charter entities; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto

Purpose

This legislation provides that the Board of Regents shall be the only entity to authorize charters.

Summary of provisions

Section 1 amends subdivision 3 of Section 2851 of the Education Law by providing that the Board of Regents shall be the entity to authorize charters.

Read the full memo (1,010 words)

Section 1-a repeals subdivision 5 of Section 2851 of the Education Law.

Section 2 amends paragraph (e) of subdivision 4 of Section 2851 of the Education Law by providing that the Board of Regents shall be the entity to establish and develop enrollment and retention targets of students with disabilities, English language learners, and students who are eligible applicants for the free and reduced price lunch program.

Section 3 amends subdivision 5-b of Section 2852 of the Education law by providing that the Board of Regents is not required to authorize a char- ter at the behest of the charter entity.

Section 4 amends subdivision 9 of Section 2852 of the Education Law by providing that the Board of Regents shall be authorized to issue char- ters upon application directly to the Board of Regents pursuant to a competitive process. A charter that has been surrendered, revoked, or terminated on or before July 1, 2015, including a charter that has not been renewed, may be reissued only by the Board of Regents pursuant to a competitive process.

Section 5 amends subdivision 9-a of Section 2852 of the Education Law by providing that the Board of Regents is authorized to issue 460 charters statewide upon applications that are directly submitted to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents shall be the entity authorized to develop the methodology for a competitive request for proposals process for charter school applications. The Board of Regents shall not consider any application that does not met the requisite criteria. Additionally, all charter school applications must meet or exceed the enrollment and retention targets set forth by the Board of Regents of students with disabilities, English language learners, and students who are eligible applicants for the free and reduced price lunch program. All charter school applicants must conduct public outreach in accordance with the process prescribed by the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents shall grant priority based on a scoring rubric and any additional objective the Board of Regents may prescribe.

Section 6 amends subdivision 10 of Section 2852 of the Education law by providing that a charter school formed by approval of the Board of Regents on or after March 15th of any school year shall not commence instruction until July of the second school year next following.

Section 7 amends subdivision 2-a of Section 2853 of the Education Law by providing that charter schools approved by the Board of Regents, the school district in which the charter school is located shall have the right to visit, examine into, and inspect the charter school to ensure that the school is in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations, and charter provisions.

Section 8 amends subdivision 1 of Section 2855 of the Education law by providing that a charter school shall have its charter revoked if a charter school fails to meet or exceed the enrollment and retention targets set forth by the Board of Regents of students with disabilities, English language learners, and students who are eligible applicants for the free and reduced price lunch program.

Section 9 amends subdivision 2 of Section 2857 of the Education Law by providing that each charter school shall submit an annual report detail- ing the efforts to comply with the retention and enrollment targets set forth by the Board of Regents of students with disabilities, English language learners, and students who are eligible applicants for the free and reduced price lunch program.

Section 10 repeals subdivision 2-a of Section 355 of the Education Law.

Section 11 provides that all charters authorized by the Board of Trus- tees of the State University of New York shall remain in effect unless there is cause for revocation pursuant to Section 2855 of the Education Law. Additionally, all applications for charter renewals after the effective date of this act shall be approved by the Board of Regents.

Section 12 provides that all obligations to oversee and supervise char- ters authorized by the Board of Trustees of the State University of New York prior to the effective date of this act shall be transferred to the Board of Regents on the effective date of this act.

Section 13 provides the effective date.

Justification

As part of the budget that was ultimately signed into law in 1998, the Pataki Administration authorized the Board of Trustees of the State University of New York (SUNY) to be a charter authorizer in addition to the Board of Regents. The Board of Regents is responsible for the gener- al supervision of all educational activities within New York State. All 17 Regents are vetted through an open and transparent process conducted by the Legislature where each regent is evaluated for their commitment and dedication to education for all students. Conversely, the SUNY Board of Trustees consist of 18 members, 15 of whom are appointed by the Governor. Additionally, the SUNY Board of Trustees is responsible only for the educational activities of SUNY.

Designating the Board of Regents as the sole charter authorizer central- izes charter school applications to a single governing body. Currently, if a charter school applicant is denied by one charter authorizer, the applicant will simply go to the other charter authorizer for approval. This ability to circumvent a determination by a charter authorizer undermines the authority and mission of that authorizer. It should be noted, that the SUNY Board of Trustees has yet to deny a charter appli-

cation and has, in fact, authorized applications for which there are no more vacancies.

Legislative history

New bill.

Fiscal implications

To be determined.

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.