Skip to content
S6356Senate2019-2020 SessionSame asA1124

Hospice Care Choice for Adults

Official title

“Relates to health care decisions for adult patients without surrogates”

Sponsor Gustavo RiveraSD-33
Status
Senate Floor Calendar
Impact
3/10
Low
Outcome
Companion signed

Bill progress

Signed via A1124

What's happening

The bill exempts decisions about routine medical treatment for hospice patients without a surrogate from ethics review committee oversight.

Why it matters

  1. Speeds up routine care for hospice patients without a surrogate. By removing ethics committee oversight for routine treatments, the bill allows healthcare providers to make timely decisions for patients who lack someone to speak on their behalf.

  2. Reduces administrative burden. Ethics committee reviews can be time-consuming and resource-intensive; exempting routine treatment decisions frees up these resources for more complex or ethically challenging cases.

  3. Clarifies what counts as “routine” medical treatment. The bill explicitly distinguishes between routine care and more serious interventions, providing clearer guidance for hospice staff and helping avoid unnecessary delays or confusion in patient care.

  4. May impact patient safeguards. While it streamlines care, the exemption could raise concerns about ensuring appropriate oversight for vulnerable patients, making it important that “routine” is clearly defined and monitored.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Hospice Care Choice for Adults

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Gustavo Rivera

Senator · Senate District 33

Chair, Health

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Substituted by A1124
  2. Ordered to third reading cal.1452
  3. Referred to rules

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A1124Assembly

Easier Care for Lonely Patients

Signed by Governor · Sponsor Richard Gottfried

Impact 3 · LowSigned into law

Full text

1 pageUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

6356

2019-2020 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE

June 6, 2019

Introduced by Sen. RIVERA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules

AN ACT to amend the public health law, in relation to decisions about routine medical treatment for hospice patients without a surrogate decision maker

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Paragraph (c) of subdivision 5-a of section 2994-g of the public health law, as added by chapter 430 of the laws of 2017, is amended to read as follows:

(c) The ethics review committee of the general hospital, residential health care facility or hospice, as applicable, including at least one physician or nurse practitioner who is not the patient's attending physician or attending nurse practitioner, or a court of competent jurisdiction, must review the decision and determine that it is consistent with such standards for surrogate decisions. This requirement shall not apply to decisions about routine medical treatment. Such decisions shall be governed by subdivision three of this section.

§ 2. This act shall take effect immediately.

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD03525-01-9

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the public health law, in relation to decisions about routine medical treatment for hospice patients without a surrogate decision maker

Purpose of general idea of bill

To clarify that decisions about routine care for hospice patients with- out a surrogate decision maker do not require prior review by a n Ethics Review Committee, and are governed by the provisions in the Family Health Care Decisions Act.

Summary of specific provisions

Section 1 amends PHL § 2994-g(5-a), which requires review by an Ethics Review Committee of health care decisions for hospice patients who do not have a surrogate decision maker, to provide that such requirement shall not apply to decisions about routine medical treatment, and that such decisions shall be governed by PHL § 2994-g(3).

Section 2 provides for an immediate effective date.

Justification

The Family Health Care Decisions Act (FHCDA), in PHL § 2994-(g), estab- lishes a process to obtain health care decisions for patients who lack capacity and do not have a health care agent or surrogate decision maker - so called "isolated patients." Under that section, the attending physician may order "routine medical treatment," while more extensive processes and standards apply to decisions about "major medical treat- ment" and "decisions to withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatment."

That section defines "routine medical treatment" as: any treatment, service, or procedure to diagnose or treat an individual's physical or mental condition, such as the administration of medication, the extraction of bodily fluids for analysis, or dental care performed. with a local anesthetic, for which health care providers ordinarily do not seek specific consent from the patient or authorized representative.

In 2016, the FHCDA was amended to address decisions regarding hospice care, including enrollment in hospice, for incapable isolated patients. The process requires, among other steps, review by a facility-based Ethics Review Committee (ERC). Once admitted to hospice, changes in the isolated hospice patient's plan of care also require ERC review.

Commentators have noted that changes in the plan of care involving even routine medical treatment, such as drawing blood, would seem to require ERC review (Decisions Regarding Hospice Care for. Isolated Patients: A Guide to the 2015 Amendment of the Family Health Care Decisions Act, NYSBA Health Law Journal (Winter 2016) Such requirement is far more cumbersome than is needed for decisions about minor treatments, and would impede the prompt provision of medically necessary care. The bill clarifies that the general FHCDA provisions relating to decisions about routine medical treatment apply to isolated hospice patients as well as other patients.

Prior legislative history

New Bill

Fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

The act will take effect immediately.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.