Ban Fracking for Oil, Gas

Section 2 of the bill amends section 23-0305 of the environmental conservation law by adding a new subdivision 15 to prohibit the Depart- ment of Environmental Conservation from issuing any permit for the drilling or operation of any well proposing to use hydraulic fracturing or hydraulic fracturing fluids for the extraction of gas and/or oil.

Section 3 of the bill amends subdivision 3 of section 23-0501 of the environmental conservation law by renumbering it to subdivision 4 of section 23-0501 and adds a new subdivision 3, paragraph a, to prohibit the Department of Environmental Conservation from issuing any permit for the drilling or operation of any well proposing to use hydraulic frac- turing or hydraulic fracturing fluids for the extraction of gas and/or oil; and, paragraph. b that defines hydraulic fracturing as the fractur- ing of rock by Mat-made fluid-driven fracturing techniques for the purpose of stimulating natural gas or oil well production.

Section 4 of the bill amends the environmental conservation law by adding a new section 17-0513 to prohibit the acceptance, disposal and /or processing of any fluid (including drill cutting) used in a hydrau- lic fracturing process. Drilling fluids include drilling mud, chemical additives contained in or added to drilling fluids during hydraulic fracturing process, flow back water and any other residual liquids.

Drill cuttings include solid products removed from the well bore during an oil or gas well drilling operation.

Section 5 sets an immediate effective date.

Justification

As the price of oil continues its meteoric rise due to demand and regional instability in oil producing nations, the cry for fuel alterna- tives including natural gas gets louder. In addition, the need for job creation becomes more imperative as New Yorkers try to recover from the economic crises of recent years and the state attempts to balance an out of control budget. Each of these mounting concerns compels the State to utilize its large natural gas reserves to alleviate these problems. Unfortunately, in our haste to find an expedient and viable solution to these issues the State could easily create a situation where we put our citizens at grave risk of harm from an environmental disaster by expand- ing the use of hydraulic fracturing methods of extracting natural gas and oil.

The extraction of natural gas and oil reserves using hydraulic fractur- ing presents significant risk to the environment. This method of natural gas and oil extraction utilizes water combined with multiple chemical additives, some of which are toxic and have been show n to be associated with public health risks such as cancer and developmental delays. Unfor- tunately many companies involved in drilling have been resistant to revealing which chemicals are contained in their fracturing fluids, making it difficult for communities to assess their risk due to drilling operations. There are also additional chemical contamination risks posed by transportation of chemicals to drilling sites and the storage of the millions of gallons of used fluids that are produced through the drill- ing process.

Most importantly, a large proportion of the stale' s drinking water supplies come from areas located above the Utica and Marcellus Shale geological formations where much of the state's natural gas reserves exist. Use of hydraulic fracturing to extract these reserves inherently creates a tremendous risk of contamination to the State's drinking water supply and in turn risk of a significant public health crisis affecting millions of people both upstate and downstate.

Moreover, communities located above the Utica and Marcellus Shales would be further burdened by the construction of new roads to accommodate drilling sites, increased traffic, and potential decreases in air quali- ty due to emissions from drilling operations.

In addition, the state currently allows hydrofracking waste products, including drill cuttings (pulverized rock) and drilling fluid, to be dumped in CUT landfills, spread on our fields and roads and "treated" in waste treatment facilities that are not necessarily equipped to properly treat such materials. Much of this hydrofracking waste includes low-lev- el radioactive waste such as Ra-226 which is a /mown carcinogen and is especially dangerous if inhaled or ingested. It is not a stretch of the imagination to see that these waste products could very easily find their way into local ground water directly exposing people by ingestion of the water or by inhaling dust that comes from local landfills or from roads and fields where it has been spread. A significant amount of this hydrofracking waste is being imported from outside New York, primarily from neighboring Pennsylvania. Trucks cross New York State borders on a daily basis carrying this highly dangerous waste into our state and place many of our citizens at great risk.

The risk of catastrophic danger to the environment, especially the state's drinking water supplies, as a result hydraulic fracturing far outweighs the potential for job creation and promotion of a natural gas alternative to oil. Therefore, the practice of hydraulic fracturing and the disposal and/ or processing of hydrofracking fluids and drill cuttings should be banned throughout New York State.

Prior legislative history

2013-14: A.1685/EnConT S.673/EnCon 2011-12: A.7218-B/Encon; E.4220-B/Encon

Fiscal implications

Yet to be determined.

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately.