What's happening
This bill requires state contracts to use only net-neutral internet service providers, mandates annual transparency reports, and creates a $250 million loan fund to help municipalities establish their own broadband services.
Why it matters
State contracts will prioritize net-neutral ISPs, impacting which companies can win lucrative public contracts. This could pressure ISPs to adhere to net neutrality principles if they want to do business with state agencies, schools, libraries, and local governments, potentially shifting business practices even among providers who otherwise wouldn’t follow such rules.
Annual transparency and public reporting requirements for ISPs will give consumers and policymakers greater insight into how internet traffic is managed. This could reveal practices like throttling, blocking, or paid prioritization, making it easier for the public to spot violations and for the state to hold providers accountable.
Preemption of local broadband regulations means a single, statewide standard for net neutrality, which may override stricter or weaker local laws. This centralizes authority, affecting municipalities that may have wanted to set their own internet rules—either to be more protective or more permissive.
The $250 million revolving loan fund specifically supports municipal broadband, potentially increasing competition and local control over internet infrastructure. By enabling cities, towns, and counties to start their own ISPs, the bill aims to address service gaps, improve affordability, and provide an alternative if commercial providers are insufficient or noncompliant.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Require Net Neutral Internet
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
1 Co-sponsor
History
- Referred to finance
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Require Net Neutral Internet
In Assembly Committee · Corporations, Authorities And Commissions · Sponsor Patricia Fahy
Full text
6 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
8020
IN SENATE
March 10, 2020
Introduced by Sen. PARKER -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Finance
AN ACT to amend the public service law, the general business law and the state finance law, in relation to requiring that internet service providers that are compliant with net neutrality and state contracts only be made with such compliant providers and establishing a revolving fund for the creation of municipal internet service providers; and making an appropriation therefor
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "NYS Net Neutrality Protection Act".
§ 2. The public service law is amended by adding a new section 92-i to read as follows:
§ 92-i. Reports by internet service providers. 1. Any telephone corporation, as defined by subdivision seventeen of section two of this chapter, or cable television company, as defined by subdivision one of section two hundred twelve of this chapter, which is also a broadband internet service provider, as defined by paragraph (b) of subdivision one of section three hundred ninety-nine-zzzzz of the general business law, shall annually report to the department, and publicly disclose, accurate information regarding network management practices, performance, and commercial terms of such company's or corporation's broadband internet access that is sufficient for consumers to make informed choices regarding the use of such services, and for content, application, service, and device providers to develop, market, and maintain internet offerings.
2. The publication of disclosures that comply with the federal communications commission's transparency rule (47 C.F.R. 8.1) shall satisfy the requirements of subdivision one of this section.
3. The commission shall annually prepare a report that lists the certification status for each broadband internet service provider qualified to do business in the state. Such report shall be published on the commission's website and updated at least annually. The commission shall
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD15238-02-0
S. 8020 2
notify the governor, the temporary president of the senate, and the speaker of the assembly of the publication of such report and of any updates to such report.
4. Except to the extent necessary to supervise the reporting and notice requirements of subdivisions one and two of this section, nothing in this section shall confer upon the commission any regulatory jurisdiction over internet service providers or internet broadband services.
§ 3. The general business law is amended by adding a new section 399- zzzzz to read as follows:
§ 399-zzzzz. Net neutrality. 1. Definitions. For the purposes of this section, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
(a) "Broadband internet access" shall mean a mass-market retail service by wire or radio that provides the capability to transmit data to and receive data from all or substantially all internet endpoints, including any capabilities that are incidental to and enable the operation of the communications service, but shall not include dial-up internet access service. Broadband internet access shall be considered to be an information service as such term is defined pursuant to 47 U.S.C. 153.
(b) "Broadband internet service provider" shall mean any person, business or organization qualified to do business in this state, including municipal broadband providers, to the extent that such individuals, corporations, or other entities provide other individuals, corporations or entities with broadband internet access.
(c) "End user" shall mean any individual or entity that utilizes broadband internet access.
(d) "Paid prioritization" shall mean the management of a broadband provider's network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic in a manner that materially harms competition and materially harms end users, including through the use of traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, which is either:
(i) in exchange for consideration, monetary or otherwise, from a third party; or
(ii) to benefit an affiliated entity.
(e) "Reasonable network management" shall mean a network management practice that is appropriate and tailored to achieving a legitimate network management purpose, including deterring or preventing cybersecurity threats and similar threats originating from equipment connected directly or indirectly to the network or otherwise, taking into account the particular network architecture and technology of the broadband internet access service.
(f) "Specialized services" shall mean service other than broadband internet access that is provided by broadband providers over last-mile capacity shared with broadband internet access.
2. Net neutrality. (a) Any broadband internet service provider shall not:
(i) block lawful content, applications, services, or non-harmful devices, subject to reasonable network management.
(ii) impair or degrade lawful internet traffic on the basis of internet content, application, or service, or use of a non-harmful device, subject to reasonable network management.
(iii) engage in paid prioritization, including, but not limited to, traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either:
(A) in exchange for any form of consideration from a third party, or
S. 8020 3
(B) to benefit an affiliated entity, unless the broadband internet service provider demonstrates that the practice would provide a significant public interest benefit and would not harm the open nature of the internet.
(b) Nothing in this section shall:
(i) supersede any obligation or authorization a provider of broadband internet access may have to address the needs of emergency communications or law enforcement, public safety, or national security authorities, consistent with or as permitted by applicable law, or limit the provider's ability to do so;
(ii) prohibit reasonable efforts by a provider of broadband internet access to address copyright infringement or other unlawful activity;
(iii) be construed to limit the choice of service plans available to consumers, or consumers' control over their chosen broadband internet access; and
(iv) be construed to limit the ability of broadband internet access providers to offer or provide specialized services, so long as the broadband internet service provider continues to offer broadband internet access in a manner consistent with the provisions of this section.
3. Reporting. Any person or entity engaged in providing broadband internet access within the state who are not covered by either of the definitions established pursuant to subdivision seventeen of section two or subdivision one of section two hundred twelve of the public service law, shall report to the commission, and publicly disclose at least annually, accurate information regarding the network management practices, performance, and commercial terms of such company's or corporation's broadband internet access that is sufficient for consumers to make informed choices regarding the use of such services, and for content, application, service, and device providers to develop, market, and maintain internet offerings.
4. Enforcement. A violation of the requirements of this section by a broadband internet service provider shall be enforceable solely through an action brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in this state by the attorney general.
5. Preemption. Any provision of any local law or ordinance, or any rule or regulation promulgated thereto, governing broadband internet service shall upon the effective date of this section, be preempted.
§ 4. The state finance law is amended by adding a new section 148 to read as follows:
§ 148. Contracting for broadband internet access. 1. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, where a contract pertains to broadband internet access, as defined in section three hundred ninety-nine-zzzzz of the general business law, such contract shall be awarded by:
(i) a state agency, as defined in section one hundred sixty of this chapter, or any state or local authority, as such terms are defined in section two of the public authorities law; or
(ii) a municipal corporation as defined in section two of the general municipal law, or any public benefit corporation or municipality of the state; or
(iii) public library or association library, as such terms are defined in section two hundred fifty-three of the education law; or
(iv) the legislature, judiciary, state university of New York, or city university of New York.
(b) If such contract is formed pursuant to a competitive bidding process or a request for proposal process, whenever the responsive and
S. 8020 4
responsible offerer having the lowest price or best value offer has not agreed to stipulate to the conditions set forth in this subdivision and another responsive and responsible offerer who has agreed to stipulate to such conditions has submitted an offer, the contract shall be awarded to the lowest price or best value offer for internet services from a source compliant with the internet service neutrality requirements established in section three hundred ninety-nine-zzzzz of the general business law.
(c) Provided, however, the entity awarding such contract may award such contract to a non-compliant broadband internet service provider, only if such entity determines that:
(i) there are no other broadband internet service providers available to contract with;
(ii) awarding such contract to a compliant broadband internet service provider would result in a significant financial hardship when compared to awarding such contract to a non-compliant broadband internet service provider; or
(iii) there is no need for the broadband internet service provider to meet such requirements in order to render the service required by such entity.
2. (a) In the case of contracts let by other than a competitive process which include internet services involving an expenditure of an amount greater than the discretionary buying threshold, as specified in section one hundred sixty-three of this article, the contracting entity shall not award to a proposed contractor who has not agreed to stipulate to the conditions set forth in this subdivision unless the entity seeking to use the internet services determines that:
(i) the internet services are necessary for the entity to perform its functions and there is no other responsible contractor who will supply internet services of comparable quality at a comparable price;
(ii) awarding such contract to a compliant broadband internet service provider would result in a significant financial hardship when compared to awarding such contract to a non-compliant broadband internet service provider; or
(iii) there is no need for the broadband internet service provider to meet such requirements in order to render the service required by such entity.
(b) Any determinations under paragraph (a) of this subdivision shall be made in writing and shall be public documents.
3. Nothing is this section shall:
(a) supersede any obligation or authorization a provider of broadband internet access may have to address the needs of emergency communications or law enforcement, public safety, or national security authorities, consistent with or as permitted by applicable law, or limit the provider's ability to do so;
(b) prohibit reasonable efforts by a provider of broadband internet access to address copyright infringement or other unlawful activity;
(c) be construed to limit the choice of service plans available to consumers, or consumers' control over their chosen broadband internet access; and
(d) be construed to limit the ability of broadband internet access providers to offer or provide specialized services, so long as the broadband internet service provider continues to offer broadband internet access in a manner consistent with section three hundred ninetynine-zzzzz of the general business law.
S. 8020 5
§ 5. Subdivision 1 of section 165 of the state finance law is amended by adding two new paragraphs f and g to read as follows:
f. "Net neutral source of internet services" shall mean an internet service provider that adheres to the principles of net neutrality as described in section three hundred ninety-nine-zzzzz of the general business law.
g. "Non-net neutral source of internet services" shall mean an internet service provider that violates any of the principles of net neutrality as described in section three hundred ninety-nine-zzzzz of the general business law.
§ 6. The state finance law is amended by adding a new section 99-hh to read as follows:
§ 99-hh. Municipal internet service provider revolving loan fund. 1. There is hereby established in the joint custody of the comptroller and the public service commission a fund to be known as the "municipal internet service provider revolving loan fund". Such fund shall consist of moneys made available pursuant to appropriation and any other sources in order to provide support for municipalities attempting to create their own internet service provider.
2. The account shall consist of all moneys appropriated for its purpose, all moneys transferred to such account pursuant to law, and all moneys required by this section or any other law to be paid into or credited to this account, including all moneys received by the account or donated to it, payments of principal and interest on loans made from the account, and any interest earnings which may accrue from the investment or reinvestment of moneys from the account.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the public service law, the general business law and the state finance law, in relation to requiring that internet service providers that are compliant with net neutrality and state contracts only be made with such compliant providers and establishing a revolving fund for the creation of municipal internet service providers; and making an appropriation therefor
Purpose or general idea of bill
The purpose of this bill is to retain the policy of net neutrality at a State level and to add an appropriation, which would provide a revolving loan fund for any municipality that has a noncomplying ISP in its envi- rons to be able to borrow the capital to build a competing network.
Summary of specific provisions
Section 1 titles the bill the "NYS Net Neutrality Protection Act".
Read the full memo (734 words)
Section 2 amends the public service law adding a new section 92-i.
Section 3 amends the general business law by adding a new section 399-zzzzz.
Section 4 amends the state finance law by adding a new section 148.
Section 5 amends subdivision 1 of section 165 of state finance law.
Section 6 amends the state finance law by adding a new section 99-hh.
Section 7: the sum of two hundred fifty million dollars or so much ther- eof as may necessary is hereby appropriated from any moneys in the state treasury in the general fund to the credit of the state purposes account for the initial capital of the municipal interest service provider revolving loan fund in carrying out the provisions of this act. Such sum shall be payable on the audit and warrant of the state comp- troller on vouchers certified or approved in the manner provided by law. No expenditure shall be made from this appropriation until a certificate of approval of availability shall have been issued by the director of the budget and filed with the state comptroller and a copy filed with the chairman of the Senate finance committee and the chairman of the assem- bly ways and means committee. Such certificate may be amended from time to time by the director of the budget and a copy of each such amendment shall be filed with the state comptroller, the chairman of the senate finance committee and the chairman of the assembly ways and means committee.
Section 8: adds a separability provision.
Section 9: sets for the effective date.
Justification
Neutrality has been a core democratizing principle of the Internet since its inception. Net Neutrality is the cornerstone idea of the worldwide web that all internet data should be equal. Internet Service Providers (ISP) should not be allowed to charge different companies more or less for their data or to slow down, or block access to web sites and services they do not like. Internet service is a telecommunications service, no different from phone service. Phone companies, which are often the same companies that are ISPs, cannot make the connection worse if they do not approve of the caller on the other end of a call.
Both Freedom of Speech issues and fair competition issues arise with the FCC decision to do away with the 2010 provisions of the law. The FCC's recent vote will make it easier for ISPs to change the nature of the internet, making some websites and services cheaper and more easily accessible, and others harder or more expensive to access. If major corporations could pay to get special treatment-faster speeds, more bandwidth- start-ups would be at a disadvantage. Hence, net neutrality protects innovation as well because without it, small business entrepre- neurs will not survive. These small businesses constitute the majority of the businesses in every region of the State - comprising at least 90 percent of total businesses in each region.
The deregulation of the internet will lead to a multitude of issues. We have seen this before with the deregulation of airlines and banks. Unleashing the airlines to set their own fares and routes created over- crowded planes, cramped seats, overstuffed luggage bins and absorbent fares. Deregulation of banking allowed widespread abuses that triggered the meltdown in the financial markets in 2008 and crashed the American economy with reverberating effect.
Prior legislative history
New bill.
Fiscal implications for state and local governments
EFFECTIVE DATE: This act shall take effect effect the one hundred eightieth day after it shall have become a law.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.