Skip to content
S8687Senate2019-2020 Session

Expand Court Diversion Programs

Official title

“Relates to judicial diversion programs; repealer”

Sponsor Jessica RamosSD-13+1 co-sponsor
Status
In Senate Committee
Rules
Impact
8/10
Significant
Passage
0%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Rules

What's happening

This bill expands judicial diversion programs to include all defendants with functional impairments, not just certain felony offenders, and establishes diversion parts in every county.

Why it matters

  1. Broadens access to diversion programs. By making all defendants with a "functional impairment" (including mental illness, developmental disabilities, substance use disorders, traumatic brain injury, and more) eligible, the bill enables a much wider range of people—beyond just certain felony drug offenders—to seek alternatives to traditional prosecution and incarceration.

  2. Limits prosecutorial gatekeeping and expands judicial discretion. The new law removes the prosecutor's ability to block diversion, strengthens the presumption of innocence by generally prohibiting requirements for a guilty plea before entering diversion, and ensures that severe collateral consequences (like immigration or housing impacts) are considered.

  3. Improves oversight, transparency, and accountability. By mandating annual public reports with demographic, outcome, and cost data, and specifying required training for judges and staff, the bill aims to ensure fair, effective, and equitable implementation across all counties—potentially reducing disparities and improving program quality.

  4. Centers health care expertise and treatment flexibility. The law defers to licensed health care professionals to define and diagnose "functional impairment," requires courts to consider their recommendations for treatment, and prohibits requiring defendants to pay for court-mandated care not covered by insurance—prioritizing medical judgment and reducing financial barriers to participation.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Expand Court Diversion Programs

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Jessica Ramos

Senator · Senate District 13

Chair, Labor

1 Co-sponsor

History

  1. Referred to rules

Full text

8 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

8687

IN SENATE

July 8, 2020

Introduced by Sen. RAMOS -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules

AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to judicial diversion programs; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relating thereto

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. The article heading of article 216 of the criminal procedure law, as added by section 4 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows:

JUDICIAL DIVERSION [PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN FELONY OFFENDERS]

PROGRAMS

§ 2. The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 90 of the laws of 2014, is amended to read as follows:

"Eligible defendant" means any person who stands charged in an indictment [or a], superior court information [with a class B, C, D or E felony offense defined in article one hundred seventy-nine, two hundred twenty or two hundred twenty-one of the penal law or any other specified offense as defined in subdivision four of section 410.91 of this chapter, provided, however, a defendant is not an "eligible defendant" if he or she:], misdemeanor complaint or felony complaint with any offense and has a functional impairment.

§ 3. The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as added by section 4 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows:

"Eligible defendant" means any person who stands charged in an indictment [or a], superior court information [with a class B, C, D or E felony offense defined in article two hundred twenty or two hundred twentyone of the penal law or any other specified offense as defined in subdivision four of section 410.91 of this chapter, provided, however, a defendant is not an "eligible defendant" if he or she:], misdemeanor complaint or felony complaint with any offense and has a functional impairment.

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD16163-02-0

S. 8687 2

§ 4. Paragraphs (a) and (b) and the closing paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law are REPEALED.

§ 5. Subdivision 2 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as added by section 4 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows:

2. ["Alcohol and substance abuse] "Functional impairment" means a condition determined by a licensed health care professional to impair the defendant's functioning. A functional impairment may include, but is not limited to, substance abuse or alcohol dependence, mental illness, developmental disability, intellectual disability, traumatic brain injury or other neurological disease, personality disorder, cognitive dysfunction, dementia or emotional disturbance. The court shall defer to licensed health care professionals and the broader medical community consensus in determining what a functional impairment is in recognition that such standards may change quickly within the medical field based on new research. A person may have more than one functional impairment.

3. "Clinical evaluation" means a written assessment and report by a court-approved entity or licensed health care professional experienced in the treatment of [alcohol and substance abuse, or] functional impairments as defined in subdivision two of this section or an evaluation conducted by an addiction and substance abuse counselor credentialed by the office of [alcoholism and substance abuse services] addiction services and supports pursuant to section 19.07 of the mental hygiene law, which shall include:

(a) an evaluation as to whether the defendant currently has a [history of alcohol or substance abuse or alcohol or substance dependence] functional impairment including but not limited to a mental disorder, as [such terms are] defined in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, [fourth] fifth edition, and a co-occurring [mental disorder or mental illness and the relationship between such abuse or dependence and mental disorder or mental illness] functional impairment, if any;

(b) a recommendation as to whether the defendant's [alcohol or substance abuse or dependence] functional impairments, if any, could be effectively addressed by judicial diversion in accordance with this article;

(c) a recommendation as to the treatment modality, level of care and length of any proposed treatment to effectively address the defendant's [alcohol or substance abuse or dependence and any co-occurring mental disorder or illness] functional impairments; and

(d) any other information, factor, circumstance, or recommendation deemed relevant by the assessing entity or specifically requested by the court.

§ 6. Section 216.05 of the criminal procedure law, as added by section 4 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, subdivision 5 as amended by chapter 67 of the laws of 2016, subdivision 8 as amended by chapter 315 of the laws of 2016 and paragraph (a) of subdivision 9 as amended by section 21 of part JJJ of chapter 59 of the laws of 2019, is amended to read as follows: § 216.05 Judicial diversion program; court procedures.

1. At any time after the arraignment of an eligible defendant, but prior to the entry of a plea of guilty or the commencement of trial, the court at the request of the eligible defendant, [may] shall order [an alcohol and substance abuse] a clinical evaluation. An eligible defendant may decline to participate in such an evaluation at any time. The defendant shall provide a written authorization, in compliance with the

S. 8687 3

requirements of any applicable state or federal laws, rules or regulations authorizing disclosure of the results of the assessment to the defendant's attorney, the prosecutor, the local probation department, the court, authorized court personnel and other individuals specified in such authorization for the sole purpose of determining whether the defendant should be offered judicial diversion for treatment for [substance abuse or dependence, alcohol abuse or dependence and any co-occurring mental disorder or mental illness] functional impairment or mental disorder.

2. Upon receipt of the completed [alcohol and substance abuse] clinical evaluation report, the court shall provide a copy of the report to the eligible defendant and the [prosecutor] defendant's counsel. Any finding in the report or assessment that the defendant has a mental disorder as defined in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth edition, or a clinical diagnosis of another serious functional impairment shall be viewed as presumptive evidence that the case should be diverted and the defendant should receive treatment.

3. (a) Upon receipt of the evaluation report [either party] the defendant may request a hearing on the issue of whether the eligible defendant should be offered [alcohol or substance abuse] treatment pursuant to this article. At such time, the defendant shall turn over a complete copy of the evaluation report to the prosecutor and the court. At such a proceeding, which shall be held as soon as practicable so as to facilitate early intervention in the event that the defendant is found to need [alcohol or substance abuse] treatment, the court may consider oral and written arguments, may take testimony from witnesses offered by either party, and may consider any relevant evidence including, but not limited to, evidence that:

(i) the defendant had within the preceding ten years (excluding any time during which the offender was incarcerated for any reason between the time of the acts that led to the youthful offender adjudication and the time of commission of the present offense) been adjudicated a youthful offender for: (A) a violent felony offense as defined in section 70.02 of the penal law; or (B) any offense for which a merit time allowance is not available pursuant to subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (d) of subdivision one of section eight hundred three of the correction law; and

(ii) in the case of a felony offense defined in subdivision four of section 410.91 of this chapter, any statement of or submitted by the victim, as defined in paragraph (a) of subdivision two of section 380.50 of this chapter; and

(iii) the defendant has a functional impairment; and

(iv) the defendant's functional impairment contributed to their criminal legal system involvement.

(b) Upon completion of such a proceeding, the court shall consider and make findings of fact with respect to whether:

(i) the defendant is an eligible defendant as defined in subdivision one of section 216.00 of this article;

(ii) the defendant has a [history of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence] functional impairment as defined in subdivision two of section 216.00 of this article;

(iii) such [alcohol or substance abuse or dependence] functional impairment is or may be a contributing factor to the defendant's [criminal behavior] involvement in the criminal legal system;

(iv) the defendant's participation in judicial diversion could effectively address such [abuse or dependence] functional impairment; and

S. 8687 4

(v) institutional confinement [of] or outpatient treatment for the defendant [is or may not be necessary for the protection of the public] would benefit the public or the defendant.

4. (a) When an authorized court determines, pursuant to paragraph (b) of subdivision three of this section, that an eligible defendant should be offered [alcohol or substance abuse] treatment, or when the parties and the court agree to an eligible defendant's participation in [alcohol or substance abuse] treatment, an eligible defendant [may] shall be allowed to participate in the judicial diversion program offered by this article. [Prior to the court's issuing an order granting judicial diversion, the eligible defendant shall be required to enter a plea of guilty to the charge or charges; provided, however, that no such guilty plea shall be required when:

(a) the people and the court consent to the entry of such an order without a plea of guilty; or

(b) based on a finding of exceptional circumstances, the court determines that a plea of guilty shall not be required. For purposes of this subdivision, exceptional circumstances exist when, regardless of the ultimate disposition of the case, the entry of a plea of guilty is likely to result in severe collateral consequences.]

(b) There shall be a presumption in favor of allowing eligible defendants to participate in the judicial diversion program without a prior plea of guilt. This presumption recognizes the presumption of innocence in all cases before the prosecutor obtains a conviction. This presumption also protects defendants from the severe collateral consequences associated with a criminal conviction, particularly consequences relating to immigration status, licensing for employment, and housing. Under no circumstances shall the prosecutor serve as a gatekeeper to diversion.

(c) In the rare circumstance that a court determines that a plea of guilty prior to treatment is necessary, such as when the defendant has previously failed to complete judicial diversion under this article on more than two occasions, the defendant shall not be required to waive their trial rights or submit an affidavit conceding their guilt. Under no circumstance shall a court require a plea of guilty prior to disclosure of the discovery material in the case pursuant to section 245.25 of this chapter.

5. The defendant shall agree on the record or in writing to abide by the release conditions set by the court, which, shall include[:] participation in a specified period of [alcohol or substance abuse] treatment at a specified program or programs identified by the court[, which may include]. The court shall take into account the views of the health care professional who conducted the clinical evaluation and any health care professionals responsible for providing such treatment or monitoring the defendant's progress in such treatment. Additional release conditions may include:

(a) adhering to a doctor's prescribed medication,

(b) periods of detoxification,

(c) residential or outpatient treatment, or both, as determined after taking into account the views of the health care professional who conducted the mental health assessment or alcohol and substance abuse evaluation and any health care professionals responsible for providing such treatment or monitoring the defendant's progress in such treatment; and may include:

[(i)] (d) periodic court appearances, which may include periodic urinalysis;

S. 8687 5

[(ii)] (e) a requirement that the defendant refrain from engaging in criminal behaviors;

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to judicial diversion programs; and to repeal certain provisions of such law relat- ing thereto

Summary of provisions

Section 1: The article heading of article 216 of the criminal procedure law, as added by section 4 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows:

JUDICIAL DIVERSION PROGRAM FOR CERTAIN FELONY OFFENDERS

Read the full memo (1,308 words)

Section 2. The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as amended by chapter 90 of the laws of 2014, is amended to include within the definition of "Eligible defend- ant: MISDEMEANOR COMPLAINT OR FELONY COMPLAINT WITH ANY OFFENSE AND HAS A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT.ct.

Section 3. The opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law, as added by section 4 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to include within the definition of "Eligible defendant: MISDEMEANOR COMPLAINT OR FELONY COMPLAINT WITH ANY OFFENSE AND HAS A FUNCTIONAL IMPAIRMENT.ct.

Section 4. Paragraphs (a) and (b) and the closing paragraph of subdivi- sion 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law are REPEALED.

Section 5. § 5. Subdivision 2 of section 216.00 of the criminal proce- dure law, as added by section 4 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, is amended to read as follows:

2. ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE "Functional Impairment"

Section 6. Section 216.05 of the criminal procedure law, as added by section 4 of part AAA of chapter 56 of the laws of 2009, subdivision 5 as amended by chapter 67 of the laws of 2016, subdivision 8 as amended by chapter 315 of the laws of 2016 and paragraph (a) of subdivision 9 as amended by section 21 of part JJJ of chapter 59 of the laws of 2019, is amended to read as follows: § 216.05 Judicial diversion program; court procedures.

Section 7. The criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new section 216.10 to read as follows: § 216.10Diversionpartestablished.

Section 8. This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however that the amendments to the opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law made by section two of this act shall be subject to the expiration and reversion of such paragraph pursuant to section 12 of chapter 90 of the laws of 2014, as amended, when upon such date the provisions of section three of this act shall take effect.

Justification

The Treatment Not Jails Act will ensure that people with mental illness have an off-ramp from the criminal legal system to obtain treatment and support in their communities. One critical vehicle for diversion is mental health treatment courts. Yet mental health courts are not avail- able in every community, and many have significant barrier to access that ensure that, often, the people most in need of mental health inter- ventions are not able to get them. This bill will expand existing law authorizing drug treatment courts to include people with mental health issues and will expand eligibility for the programs to more accused people.

New York State's jails and prisons have replaced hospitals as the prima- ry facility for mentally ill individuals. There are more people with serious mental illness on Rikers Island than in any psychiatric hospital in the United States. In 2019, New York City's Correctional Health Services reported that approximately 1,100 people incarcerated in New York City jails - 16 percent of the entire jail population - had been diagnosed with serious mental illness. While New York does not collect equivalent data state-wide, surveys show that approximately 20 percent of people incarcerated in local jails have a serious mental illness. The experience in our state over the past 40 years shows that we cannot successfully incarcerate our way out of a mental health crisis. We must seek another path.

According to a 2015 study from the Center for Court Innovation, only 26 criminal courts statewide have mental health treatment courts. Over three-quarters of mental health courts accept misdemeanors, and nearly two-thirds accept nonviolent felonies. Only seven courts statewide (4 of 6 in NYC and 3 of 20 in the rest of the state) accept violent felonies. Regarding prior criminal history, all courts accept defendants with prior misdemeanor and nonviolent felony convictions. Over half of mental health courts statewide, including all NYC courts, accept defend- ants with prior violent felony convictions.(1) Because there is no stat- ute mandating that courts accept defendants, the sickest people with the longest history of documented serious mental illness are often precluded from the courts altogether.

New York is already serving people with substance abuse and alcohol problems better than people with mental illness. In 2009, the New York legislature passed major reforms to the Rockefeller Drug Laws. One component of those reforms was the creation of Article 216 of the Crimi- nal Procedure Law (CPL). Article 216 expanded judicial discretion to provide drug court alternatives to certain addicted non-violent offen- ders without the approval of the district attorney. The Article also established a mechanism to request a judicial hearing on diversion to drug court and allowed for conditional sealing of cases upon graduation from a court-ordered drug diversion program. Prior to the 2009 reforms, the decision to allow defendants to participate in drug court required the consent of the district attorney prosecuting the case. Article 216 eliminated the need for DA consent and established a mechanism for defendants to request a judicial hearing on diversion to drug court.(2)

The effects of Article 216 were most profound in upstate counties. As crime and arrests continued to fall in New York City, the number of drug court screens and admissions fell as well. But upstate, the number of admissions of drug court doubled, from 1,036 in 2008 to 2,086 in 2013. A 2013 study of the reforms by the state's Division of Criminal Justice Services following drug court participants for 24 months in the communi- ty after incarceration found that drug court participants had signif- icantly lower recidivism rates than similarly situated offenders who were sentenced to prison. While this data is encouraging, Article 216 does not extend eligibility to drug court to people accused of misdemea- nors or other non-drug related felonies.

As our communities work together to dismantle mass incarceration, we must amend Article 216 to create mental health court alternatives for people suffering from functional impairments. This means not only people with substance use disorders or mental illness, but also people with intellectual disabilities, traumatic brain injury, dementia or other conditions that may have contributed to the defendant's involvement in the criminal legal system. This bill also removes significant barriers to entry that ensure that the people most in need of help can get it. It also increases due process protections for people with cases in these courts to ensure that they are not jailed or remanded summarily. Final- ly, the bill extends treatment courts to people charged with misdemeanor offenses. There are thousands of people who are frequently targeted by police and/or arrested for low-level misdemeanors or violations that stem from their functional impairments. These people should also have access to treatment courts. (1)https://www.courtinnovation.org/sites/defaut/files/documents/MHC% 20Policy%20Study%20Report_Final.pdf

(2)https://www.crimonaljustice.ny.gov/drug-law-reform/documents/ dlr-up- date-report-may-2014.pdf

Legislative history

New Bill

Fiscal implications for state and local governments

To be determined.

Effective date

This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however that the amendments to the opening paragraph of subdivision 1 of section 216.00 of the criminal procedure law made by section two of this act shall be subject to the expiration and reversion of such paragraph pursuant to section 12 of chapter 90 of the laws of 2014, as amended, when upon such date the provisions of section three of this act shall take effect.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.