Skip to content
A1429Assembly2025-2026 Session

Limit Reversals for Delayed Trials

Official title

“Limits reversals for failure of prompt prosecution under certain circumstances”

Sponsor Amy PaulinAD-88Affects Legal
Status
In Assembly Committee
Codes
Impact
6/10
Moderate
Passage
10%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Codes

What's happening

This bill limits reversals of convictions for lack of prompt prosecution unless legal time limits are violated or the defendant is materially prejudiced by unreasonable delay.

Why it matters

  1. Narrows the grounds for overturning convictions. By specifying that a conviction can't be reversed for lack of prompt prosecution unless statutory time limits are actually violated or the defendant is materially harmed by an unreasonable delay, this bill raises the bar for successful appeals based on delay.

  2. Reduces potential for technical dismissals. Defendants can no longer seek reversal solely because a case wasn’t prosecuted "promptly" in a general sense; instead, the focus shifts to concrete statutory violations or proven harm, possibly decreasing the number of cases dismissed on procedural grounds.

  3. Potentially speeds up resolution for victims and the justice system. By limiting reversals to clear-cut scenarios, the bill may help prevent cases from being tied up or retried due to procedural ambiguities, offering more finality and efficiency in criminal proceedings.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

  • Criminal defendants

    The bill would bar reversal of a conviction for failure of prompt prosecution when neither Criminal Procedure Law section 30.10 nor 30.30 was violated and no material prejudice from unreasonable delay is shown.

  • Defense attorneys

    The bill would make a showing of material prejudice from unreasonable delay necessary to obtain reversal on prompt-prosecution grounds when neither cited section was violated.

  • District attorneys

    The bill would protect convictions from reversal on prompt-prosecution grounds when neither cited section was violated and no material prejudice from unreasonable delay is shown.

  • Appellate courts

    The bill would limit when they could reverse convictions for failure of prompt prosecution.

Headline styles

Limit Reversals for Delayed Trials

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Amy Paulin

Assembly Member · Assembly District 88

Chair, Health

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to codes
  2. Referred to codes

Full text

1 pageUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

1429

2025-2026 Regular Sessions

IN ASSEMBLY

January 9, 2025

Introduced by M. of A. PAULIN -- read once and referred to the Committee on Codes

AN ACT to amend the criminal procedure law, in relation to limiting reversals for failure of prompt prosecution under certain circumstances

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Section 30.20 of the criminal procedure law is amended by adding a new subdivision 3 to read as follows:

3. A conviction shall not be reversed for failure of prompt prosecution where there is no violation of sections 30.10 and 30.30 of this article, and no showing of material prejudice to the defendant resulting from unreasonable delay.

§ 2. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall have become a law.

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD03789-01-5

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.