Skip to content
S1044Senate2025-2026 SessionSame asA664

Ban Animal Ownership for Abusers

Official title

“Prohibits a person convicted of violating "Buster's Law" from owning or possessing a companion animal”

Sponsor James TediscoSD-44+4 co-sponsorsAffects Economy
Status
In Senate Committee
Agriculture
Impact
6/10
Moderate
Passage
24%

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Agriculture

What's happening

This bill prohibits anyone convicted under "Buster's Law" from owning companion animals unless cleared by a judge after psychological evaluation.

Why it matters

  1. Creates a long-term barrier for animal abusers. Anyone convicted under "Buster's Law" faces an automatic, ongoing prohibition on owning or possessing companion animals, closing a loophole that might otherwise allow repeat offenders to quickly regain access to pets.

  2. Makes rehabilitation and safety the focus. The only way for a convicted individual to regain animal ownership rights is to prove, through psychological or psychiatric evaluation and clear, convincing evidence, that they are mentally fit and capable of humane animal care—prioritizing both animal welfare and public safety.

  3. Involves judicial oversight and expert evaluation. The decision to restore animal ownership rights is shifted to county court judges, who must rely on professional mental health assessments, ensuring that decisions are individualized and based on expert input rather than automatic time limits.

  4. Potential deterrent effect. By setting a high bar for regaining animal ownership, the bill sends a strong message about the seriousness of animal cruelty offenses and may deter would-be offenders due to the long-lasting personal consequences.

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Ban Animal Ownership for Abusers

Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
James Tedisco

Senator · Senate District 44

History

  1. Referred to agriculture
  2. Referred to agriculture

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A664Assembly

Ban Animal Ownership for Abusers

In Assembly Committee · Agriculture · Sponsor Linda Rosenthal

Impact 6 · Moderate28% to pass

Full text

1 pageUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗

STATE OF NEW YORK

1044

2025-2026 Regular Sessions

IN SENATE (Prefiled)

January 8, 2025

Introduced by Sens. TEDISCO, FELDER, MATTERA, O'MARA -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Agriculture

AN ACT to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to limiting the ownership or possession of companion animals by persons convicted of violating "Buster's Law"

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section 1. Section 353-a of the agriculture and markets law is amended by adding a new subdivision 4 to read as follows:

4. On and after the effective date of this subdivision, no person who is convicted of a violation of this section shall own or possess a companion animal unless and until authorized by a court order issued by a county court judge of such convicted person's county of residence. No such order shall be issued until such convicted person first demonstrates to the court that such convicted person has undergone psychiatric or psychological testing, the results of which indicate by clear and convincing evidence of such convicted person's capable and sound mental capacity and ability to own and properly care for such an animal in a humane manner.

§ 2. This act shall take effect on the thirtieth day after it shall have become a law.

EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets

[ ] is old law to be omitted.

LBD02633-02-5

Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the agriculture and markets law, in relation to limiting the ownership or possession of companion animals by persons convicted of violating "Buster's Law"

Purpose or general idea of bill

To increase penalties (maximum prison sentences and maximum fines) for engaging in animal fighting and committing the crime of Aggravated Cruelty to Animals (aka Buster's Law) and require psychiatric evaluation/treatment for those committing the crime of Aggravated Cruel- ty to Animals.

Summary of specific provisions

Section 1: Section 353-a of Agriculture and Markets Law is amended by adding a new subdivision 4 to read as follows:

4.On and after the effective date of subdivision, no person who is convicted of a violation of this section shall own or possess a compan- ion animal unless and until authorized by a court order issued by a county court judge of his or her county of residence. No such order shall be issued until such convicted person first demonstrates to the court that he or she has undergone psychiatric or psychological testing, the results of which indicate by clear and convincing evidence of his or her capable n sound mental capacity and ability to own and properly care for such an animal in a humane manner.

Justification

Animal cruelty is viewed by experts as an indicator for future violence against humans. Since his 1997 arrest that led to "Buster's Law," Ches- ter Williamson has been imprisoned numerous times for crimes including Possession of Stolen Property and Attempted Burglary. In Fall 2007 his criminal path took a predictable turn with his arrest for attempted rape, sexual abuse and unlawful imprisonment of a 12-year-old girl.

Requiring early intervention in the form of psychiatric evaluation and treatment would be another tool in the attempt to modify behavior patterns to halt this pattern for escalating abuse while ensuring acts are not permitted to go on to harm another that those who commit these horrific acts are not permitted to go on to harm another companion animal.

Prior legislative history

02/02/15: S.3030 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

04/22/15: S.3030 1ST REPORT CAL.368

04/27/15: S.3030 ADVANCED TO THIRD READING 06/25/15: S.3030 committed to rules

01/06/16: S.3030 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

01/13/17: S.2501 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

05/16/17: S.25011ST REPORT CAL.936

05/17/17: S.25012ND REPORT CAL.

05/22/17: S.2501 ADVANCED TO THIRD READING

06/06/17: S.2501 PASSED SENATE

06/06/17: S.2501 DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY

06/06/17: S.2501 referred to agriculture

01/03/18: S.2501 died in assembly

01/03/18: S.2501 returned to senate

01/03/18: S.2501 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

06/05/18: S.2501 REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO RULES

06/05/18: S.2501 COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES

06/06/18: S.2501 ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1537

06/06/18: S.2501 PASSED SENATE

06/06/18: S.2501 DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY

06/06/18: S.2501 referred to agriculture

01/18/19: S.2007 REFERRED TO DOMESTIC ANIMAL WELFARE

01/08/20: S.2007 REFERRED TO DOMESTIC ANIMAL WELFARE

01/08/21: S.1257 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

01/05/22: S.1257 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

01/04/23: S.294 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

01/03/24: S.294 REFERRED TO AGRICULTURE

Fiscal implications for state and local governments

None

Effective date

This act shall take effect on the thirteenth day after it shall have become law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.