What's happening
This bill establishes a right to free legal counsel for low-income individuals in immigration court proceedings in New York State.
Why it matters
The bill significantly broadens who is eligible for state-funded legal counsel in immigration matters. including not only non-citizens but also U.S. citizens with disputed citizenship status, anyone with proceedings significantly connected to New York (even if detained out of state), and those with household incomes up to 200% of the federal poverty line. This could impact thousands of families and communities across the state.
It establishes a detailed administrative framework for implementation, oversight, and quality control. by creating a state-level administrator and an advisory committee, setting standards for legal services providers, and requiring regular data collection, reporting, and public accountability. This focus on quality and oversight aims to ensure that the right to counsel is meaningful, not just theoretical.
The right to counsel is designed to be comprehensive and enduring for the eligible individual. covering nearly all stages and venues of immigration proceedings (including appeals, habeas petitions, and certain administrative hearings), and continuing until all avenues for relief are exhausted or eligibility ceases. This provides a much greater level of continuity and protection than ad hoc or piecemeal legal aid.
The bill mandates dedicated and sustained state funding for these services and explicitly prohibits using these funds to replace existing public or private support. , which could help build long-term capacity in New York’s legal aid sector and ensure stability for providers and clients alike. This financial commitment may have significant budgetary implications but also aims to avoid disruptions in legal representation for vulnerable populations.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Guarantee Lawyers for Immigrants
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
28 Co-sponsors
- Jamaal Bailey
- Jabari Brisport
- Samra Brouk
- Cordell Cleare
- Leroy Comrie
- Jeremy Cooney
- Patricia Fahy
- Nathalia Fernandez
- Michael Gianaris
- Kristen Gonzalez
- Andrew Gounardes
- Pete Harckham
- Michelle Hinchey
- Robert Jackson
- Brian Kavanagh
- John Liu
- Rachel May
- Shelley Mayer
- Zellnor Myrie
- Kevin S. Parker
- Roxanne J. Persaud
- Jessica Ramos
- Gustavo Rivera
- Julia Salazar
- Luis R. Sepúlveda
- José M. Serrano
- Toby Ann Stavisky
- Lea Webb
History
- Referred to finance
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Guarantee Lawyers in Immigration Court
In Assembly Committee · Codes · Sponsor Catalina Cruz
Full text
8 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
141
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE (Prefiled)
January 8, 2025
Introduced by Sen. HOYLMAN-SIGAL -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Finance
AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to establishing the right to legal counsel in immigration court proceedings and providing for the administration thereof
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as "the access to representation act".
§ 2. The executive law is amended by adding a new section 94-e to read as follows:
§ 94-e. Right to counsel in immigration court proceedings. 1. Definitions. As used in this section:
(a) "Administrator" means the director of the New York state office for new Americans.
(b) "Covered individual" means any income-eligible individual in detention in New York, transferred from detention in New York to immigration detention in another state, or who is subject to removal or inspection pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229a or 8 U.S.C. § 1225 and their implementing regulations, or subject to a final order of removal under 8 C.F.R. § 1241.1, regardless of age, in a covered proceeding who is:
(i) a New York state domiciliary who is a non-United States citizen;
(ii) a New York state domiciliary who is a United States citizen or whose United States citizenship is in dispute; or
(iii) any individual whose proceedings have a significant nexus to New York state such that they should be provided relief under this statute. Significant nexus shall be established in the following circumstances: if an individual is in detention or incarcerated in the state of New York, if an individual is transferred by federal immigration authorities from New York to immigration detention in another state, if an individ-
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD00166-01-5
ual has an immigration case in a tribunal located in the state of New York, if an individual is a New York domiciliary and detained by federal immigration authorities anywhere in the United States, if an individual had an immigration case located in a tribunal in New York before being transferred by immigration authorities from detention in New Jersey to immigration detention in another state or, as determined by the administrator or designee of the administrator.
(c) "Covered proceeding" means any proceeding in a covered venue in which a covered individual is seeking an avenue of relief from removal from the United States, or is challenging their arrest or detention under the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), as amended, and its implementing regulations. A covered proceeding includes, if applicable, a proceeding or hearing in immigration court; a proceeding before the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; a proceeding in a tribunal located in New York for purposes of obtaining any order necessary for or relevant to immigration relief; a habeas corpus or other relevant petition to a federal district court challenging detention under the INA; motions to reopen or reconsider under 8 U.S.C. § 1229(a); a petition for review under 8 U.S.C. § 1252; a remand to a federal district court from the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals for fact-finding purposes; and any appeal related to any of the foregoing to the Board of Immigration Appeals, the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals, and/or the United States Supreme Court.
(d) "Covered venue" means: (i) an immigration court anywhere in the United States where the case of a covered individual is located; (ii) any tribunal located within New York state, including, but not limited to, family courts and federal district courts; (iii) with respect to the provision of legal services in the context of expedited removals, any location within the borders of New York state where expedited removals are processed; (iv) the Board of Immigration Appeals; (v) the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals; (vi) the United States Supreme Court; (vii) United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; and (viii) any tribunal as determined by the administrator or a designee of the administrator on a case-by-case basis.
(e) "Domicile" means a principal location where a person, wherever temporarily located, intends to reside.
(f) "Domiciliary" means a person that has established domicile with respect to a particular jurisdiction.
(g) "Immigration court" means a tribunal of the Executive Office for Immigration Review or a successor entity tasked with deciding the inadmissibility or deportability of a noncitizen of the United States that is presided over by an immigration judge as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(4).
(h) "Income-eligible individual" means an individual who is deemed eligible for legal services in a covered proceeding based on pre-set income-related criteria promulgated by the administrator, but in any event must at a minimum include any individual whose annual gross household income is not in excess of two hundred percent of the federal poverty guidelines as updated periodically in the Federal Register by the United States Department of Health and Human Services under the authority of 42 U.S.C. § 9902(2).
(i) "Legal services" means individualized legal assistance in a single consultation and/or ongoing legal representation, provided by a legal services provider to a covered individual, and all legal advice, advocacy, and assistance, including but not limited to social service assistance, associated with such service.
(j) "Legal services provider" means an individual, organization, or association that has the authority to provide legal services and is designated by the administrator to provide such services.
2. Right to counsel in immigration proceedings. (a) All covered individuals shall have the right to legal services as provided in this paragraph.
(i) Covered individuals facing a covered proceeding shall have the right to ongoing legal representation until termination is authorized pursuant to paragraphs (c) and (d) of this subdivision.
(ii) Covered individuals facing a covered proceeding in a covered venue other than an immigration court in New York or New Jersey shall have the right to a consultation provided by a legal services provider, and if found by the legal services provider to have a viable application for appeal, challenge to a court order, or other form of relief from removal from the United States, shall have the right to ongoing legal representation.
(b) The right to counsel established in paragraph (a) of this subdivision shall attach:
(i) In the case of proceedings for removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229a, upon receipt of a Notice to Appear, as defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1229. The obligations of this section shall be satisfied if counsel is provided to a covered individual no later than their first appearance in a covered proceeding, or as soon thereafter as is practicable.
(ii) In the case of removal proceedings pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1225, upon the commencement of such proceedings, or as soon thereafter as is practicable.
(iii) In the case of a referral to an immigration judge for a hearing pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3) or 8 U.S.C. § 1158, upon receipt of a Notice of Referral to Immigration Judge, or as soon thereafter as is practicable.
(iv) In the case of a reinstatement of a final order of removal, upon such reinstatement, or as soon thereafter as is practicable.
(v) In all other cases, as soon as is practicable.
(c) Subject to the provisions of paragraph (d) of this subdivision, the right to counsel established in paragraph (a) of this subdivision shall terminate:
(i) upon the termination or dismissal of removal proceedings or any related appellate matter in respect of a covered individual by the immigration court or other competent tribunal or authority;
(ii) upon the issuance of a final order or judgment in respect to a covered individual's removal proceedings from which there remains no opportunity for appeal or other avenue for relief including, but not limited to, motions to reopen, motions to reconsider, and petitions for review; provided, however, that legal services providers shall not be required to pursue appeals or other avenues for relief that are speculative or frivolous;
(iii) if an individual covered by virtue of being a New York state domiciliary ceases to be a New York state domiciliary and establishes domicile in a jurisdiction outside of New York state;
(iv) if an individual covered by virtue of being transferred from New York to immigration detention in another state is released from detention and is not a New York state domiciliary;
(v) if it is discovered that the initial determination that an individual was an income-eligible individual was erroneous at the time that such determination was made, as soon as such discovery occurs; provided, however, that such individual will continue to be provided with legal services pursuant to this subdivision for a reasonable amount of time to enable such person to obtain alternative counsel, so as not to materially prejudice such individual's chance of success in any covered proceeding;
(vi) if a covered individual knowingly and voluntarily waives the right to counsel; or
(vii) upon a determination by a legal services provider after the consultation described in subparagraph (ii) of paragraph (a) of this subdivision that a covered individual facing a covered proceeding in a covered venue other than an immigration court has no viable application for appeal, challenge to a court order, nor other form of relief from removal from the United States.
(d) Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (c) of this subdivision, the rights established in paragraph (a) of this subdivision shall not terminate if:
(i) an immigration judge declines to allow a legal services provider to withdraw from representing a covered individual; or
(ii) a legal services provider is prohibited from ceasing to provide legal services pursuant to the New York Rules of Professional Conduct or the Executive Office for Immigration Review's Practice Manual.
3. Powers and duties of the administrator. The administrator is charged with implementing the requirements of this section no later than January first of the sixth year following the effective date of this section, and shall promulgate such rules, policies, and procedures necessary and appropriate to accomplish such implementation no later than January first of the first year following the effective date of this section. Such rules, policies, and procedures shall include, but not be limited to, the measures delineated in this subdivision, with annual benchmarks to ensure full implementation by January first of the sixth year following the effective date of this section. The administrator shall have the power and responsibility, independently and/or through one or more designees, to:
(a) ensure that all covered individuals be advised of their right to counsel and be offered legal services as provided in paragraph (a) of subdivision two of this section;
(b) ensure independent, competent, high quality, and zealous representation of covered individuals receiving legal services provided pursuant to this section;
(c) examine, evaluate, and monitor legal services provided pursuant to this section;
(d) collect and receive information and data regarding the provision of legal services not protected by attorney-client privilege, work product privilege, or any other applicable privilege, or that can be disclosed by legal services providers without violating the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, including but not limited to:
(i) the types and combinations of such services being utilized across the state;
(ii) the salaries and other compensation paid to individual administrators, attorneys, and staff in connection with the provision of such services;
(iii) the caseloads of legal services providers providing legal services in connection with the provision of such services;
(iv) the types, nature, and timing of dispositions of cases handled by legal services providers providing legal services;
(v) the actual expenditures currently being made in connection with the provision of legal services; and
(vi) the time, funds, and in-kind resources currently being spent on providing such legal services and the amount being spent on ancillary services such as support staff and expert witnesses;
(e) analyze and evaluate collected data, and undertake any necessary research and studies, in order to consider and recommend measures to enhance the provision of effective legal services and to ensure that recipients of legal services are provided with quality representation from fiscally responsible providers, which shall include but not be limited to standards, criteria, and a process for qualifying and re-qualifying legal services providers to provide legal services;
(f) establish measures of performance which programs shall regularly report to the administrator to assist the administrator in monitoring the quality of legal services;
(g) establish the standards and criteria used in programs to determine whether individual legal services providers are qualified to provide legal services;
(h) establish the criteria and procedures used to determine whether a person is eligible to receive legal services, including requirements related to income and domicile, and to track the number of persons considered for and applicants denied such services, the reasons for the denials, and the results of any review of such denials;
(i) establish standards and criteria for the provision of legal services in cases involving a conflict of interest;
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the executive law, in relation to establishing the right to legal counsel in immigration court proceedings and providing for the administration thereof
Purpose of bill
The Access to Representation Act would: (1) establish a universal right to counsel for indigent New Yorkers who are subject to removal proceedings under federal immigration law, as well as related proceedings such as efforts to obtain special findings orders or certif- ications of helpfulness in state court; (2) appoint the Director of the New York State Office for New Americans as the administrator in charge of effectuating this right, and empowering the administrator to promul- gate rules, policies, and procedures as needed; (3) monitor and improve the legal services provided to covered individuals and submit an annual report to state officials summarizing its activities; (4) require that New York State appropriate the sums necessary to effectuate the right to counsel; (5) encourage local governments and private sources that currently provide funding for legal services to continue providing such funding; and (6) establish an advisory committee to advise and assist the administrator in carrying out its responsibilities.
Summary of specific provisions
Section 1 of the bill is the title clause, establishing the Access to Representation Act.
Read the full memo (2,062 words)
Section 2 of the bill creates a new Section 94-C to Article 6 of the New York State Executive Law ("Right to Counsel in Immigration Court Proceedings") with the following provisions:
-Subdivision 1 establishes the definitions used throughout the Act, including establishing that the Director of the Office for New Americans is be the administrator of the right to counsel program. Other defi- nitions delineate exactly which individuals are covered individuals under this statute, and therefore have a right to counsel, and the circumstances in which they benefit from those rights.
-Subdivision 2 mandates that covered individuals be provided with legal counsel, and enumerates the points at which the right to counsel attaches, differentiating between removal proceedings, expedited removal proceedings, the reinstatement of a final order of removal, instances where an individual's proceedings are consolidated with those of a covered individual, and instances involving a minor whose parent is a covered individual in immigration proceedings. This subdivision also enumerates the circumstances under which the rights granted by this statute will terminate, including if such individual's proceedings are terminated or dismissed by an immigration court or other, competent authority, if a final order or judgment is issued and there remains no reasonable pathway to seek relief, if an individual ceases to be a New York domiciliary, if an individual's income is found to be too high to qualify for coverage, or if an individual waives the right to counsel knowingly and voluntarily on the record.
-Subdivision 3 delegates responsibility to the administrator to effectu- ate the right to counsel, and grants the administrator authority to promulgate rules, policies, and procedures in order to do so.
-Subdivision 4 requires the state to establish a dedicated fund, and appropriate sufficient sums in to such fund, to allow for the provision of legal services to covered individuals. This subdivision contains provisions to ensure that funds appropriated will be used only to supplement and not supplant any existing state, local, or private fund- ing that is, or is anticipated to be, expended for the provision of legal services to covered individuals. This subdivision also makes clear that the state is not required to expend funds to provide services to covered individuals to the extent that local governments, or private- sources, are already providing such funds.
-Subdivision 5 establishes an advisory committee to assist the adminis- trator effectuating the right to counsel. The advisory committee is made up of appointees from the governor, the temporary president of the senate, and the speaker of the assembly, and must include three repre- sentatives from legal services providers designated by the administra- tor, one representative from community-based organizations that provide services to covered individuals in immigration proceedings, and one representative from the private bar. The administrator serves on the committee in an ex-officio capacity.
-Subdivision 6 clarifies that private rights of action to enforce the provisions of this statute are explicitly barred. -Subdivision 7 contains miscellaneous provisions including a preemption clause and a severability clause.
-Section 3 of the bill is the effective date.
Justification
This legislation is necessary to ensure due process and access to justice for immigrant New Yorkers for three main reasons: * Immigrants face potentially severe consequences in immigration proceedings, includ- ing removal and family separation; ** Immigrant New Yorkers face signif- icant challenges in accessing counsel in immigration court proceedings; and *** Immigrants with access to counsel fare dramatically better in immigration court proceedings. Each reason is discussed in detail below. Federal law does not provide a guaranteed right to counsel in immigration proceedings.(1) In certain removal proceedings, whether an immigrant is allowed to remain in the United States, or instead forced to return to her country of origin, is a matter, of life and death. In other cases, an immigrant in immigration proceedings may face the loss of home, family, or community. For some immigrants, this loss may be especially draconian, as the United States may have been the only home they have ever known, and losing this home means being separated from their families and communities and deported to a country that they do not know or recognize.
Immigrants can be detained indefinitely in prison-type settings under civil, administrative authority only, without the constitutional protections available in the criminal context. Immigration court proceedings directly affect the liberty interests of these detained immigrants, and their success in these proceedings could mean the difference between freedom or continued imprisonment. In immigration proceedings, the government is always represented by a trained attorney, but many indigent immigrants have no choice but to defend their cases alone. New and ever-changing administrative policies compound the diffi- culties indigent immigrants face in navigating a complex legal system with which they are not familiar. Increasing access to representation is thus imperative to ensure due process and access to justice.
Because immigration is primarily an area of federal law, and given the critical interests involved, both the New York State Bar Association and the American Bar Association have called for the creation of a federally funded system of appointed counsel for indigent immigrants in immi- gration court proceedings. However, until such a federally funded system is established, both Associations have noted that states must act to protect the rights of immigrants.
New York is home to more than 4.5 million immigrants, (2) all of whom could potentially face immigration court proceedings. It is estimated that nearly 1 million of those immigrants lack lawful status(3) and are thus particularly vulnerable to immigration enforcement. Many others are ineligible to become United States citizens and are at risk of removal from the United States.
Despite the critical interests at risk in such proceedings, immigrant New Yorkers face numerous challenges in their access to counsel, includ- ing geographic distances, political fears, financial considerations, long waiting lists, and language barriers.(4) Indigent immigrant New Yorkers cannot afford an attorney to defend them in immigration court proceedings, and they often cannot obtain low-cost or pro bono legal counsel either due to a lack of funding, or restrictive funding, a lack of such providers in many areas of New York, or other barriers. The legal service providers that exist to serve these vulnerable populations are understaffed and overburdened, located far from the vulnerable popu- lations, or lack the necessary resources to help non-English-speaking immigrants. Immigrants wishing to appeal negative immigration court decisions face even greater challenges in accessing counsel. Only 58% of nonprofits even handle appeals of immigration court cases,(5) and the burden on them to do so is tremendous, given the current challenges of adequate funding and staffing.
This legislation would help ensure appropriate funding for immigration legal services and remove these common barriers so that immigrant New Yorkers can access counsel, regardless of their income, language, or geographic location.
Access to counsel is inexorably linked to access to justice in immi- gration court. Having legal representation is one of the most important variables in obtaining a successful outcome.(6) A study by the American Immigration Council, which analyzed data on case outcomes obtained from the Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review, demonstrated that having an attorney made it more likely for an immi- grant to:
-Be released from custody: 44% of represented immigrants were given a custody hearing, compared to 18% of unrepresented immigrants, and 44% of represented immigrants were actually released from custody, compared to 11% of unrepresented immigrants;(7)
-Appear in immigration court: "Ninety percent of unrepresented immi- grants with removal orders were removed in absentia versus only 29 percent of their represented counterparts with removal orders;"(8)
-Defend themselves against removal charges: 21% of represented detained immigrants fought off removal either by filing successful applications for relief or successfully challenging the proceedings in the first instance, compared to 2% of unrepresented detained immigrants, and 60% of never-detained represented immigrants did the same versus 17% of never-detained unrepresented immigrants;(9) and Win their cases: Of those that filed applications for relief from removal, 32% of detained immigrants won their case, compared to 3% of unrepresented detained immigrants, and 78% of never-detained represented immigrants won their case versus 15% of never-detained unrepresented immigrants.(10)
The benefits of legal representation in immigration court proceedings has become even more evident through the successes of the New York Immi- grant Family Unity Project (NYIFUP), the pioneering public defender model for detained immigrants that began in New York City in 2013.
The first round of assessment of NYIFUP shows that access to lawyers has resulted in a 48% success rate for detained New Yorkers, compared to 4% pre-NYIFUP.(11) This represents a 1,100% increase in a detained individ- ual's chances of winning their cases before an immigration judge.(12) The proven impact of legal representation on case outcomes makes it imperative to provide access to counsel for immigrant New Yorkers facing immigration proceedings, especially given the quasi-criminal and adver- sarial nature of such proceedings. This is true despite additional burdens that may be placed on legal services providers in New York State. This legislation will help ensure that due process is served for vulnerable immigrant New Yorkers and that the principles of fundamental fairness are observed.
Prior legislative history
S.999 of 2023-2024 (Hoylman-Sigal): Died in Finance
A.170 of 2023-2024 (Cruz): Died in Codes
S.81-B of 2021-2022 (Hoylman): Died in Finance
A.1961-A of 2021-2022 (Cruz): Died in Codes
S.7216 of 2020 (Holyman): Died in Local Government
A.8736 of 2019-2020 (Galef): Died in Ways and Means
Fiscal implications
To be determined.
Effective date
This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law. Effective immediately the addition, amendment and/or repeal of any rule or regulation necessary for the implementation of this act on its effective date are authorized to be made and completed on or before such date. * Immigrants Face Potentially Severe Conse- quences in Immigration Proceedings, Including Removal and Family Sepa- ration. ** Immigrant New Yorkers Face Significant Challenges in Access- ing Counsel in Immigration Court Proceedings. *** Immigrants with Access to Counsel Fare Dramatically Better in Immigration Court Proceedings. (1) John R. Mills, Kristen M. Echemendia & Stephen Yale-Loehr, "Death is Different" and a Refugee's Right to Counsel, 42 CORNELL INT'L L.J. 361, 366-67 (2009) (2) Immigrants and the Economy in New York, New Am. Econ., https://www.newamericaneconomy.org/locations/new-york/ (last visited 1444 29, 2019). (3) Profile of Unauthorized Population: New York, Migration Poly Inst., https://www.migrationpolicy.org/data/unauthorized-immigrant- population/st ate/NY (last visited Mar. 23, 2019) (4) See N.Y Immigration Coalition & Immigration Advocates Response Collaborative, No Safe Harbor: Challenges in Obtaining Immigration Legal Services in New York State 6 (2018 Update), www.nyic.org/nosafeharbor. (5)Id. at 6. (6) Stacy Caplow, Peter L. Markowitz, et al., Accessing Justice: The Availablity and Adequacy of Counsel in Removal Proceedings New York immigrant Representation Study Report: Part 1, 33 Cardozo L. Rev357, 363 (Dec. 2011) (7) Ingrid Eagly & Steven Shafer, Am. Immigration Council, Access to Counsel in Immigration Court 17 (2016), https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/ research/accesstocounselinimmigration_court.pdf. (8)Id.at18. (9)Id.at19. (10)Id.at20 (11) Jennifer Stave et al., Vera Inst. of Justice, Evaluation of the New York Immigrant Family Unity Project: Assessing the Impact of Legal Representation on Family and Community Unity 5-6 (Nov. 2017), https://storage.googleapis.com/vera-web-assets/downloads/ Publications/new-york-immigrant-family-unity-project- evaluation/legacy_do wnloads/newyork-immigrant-family-unity-project- evaluation.pdf. (12) Id. at 6.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.