What's happening
This bill, "Lorraine's Law," allows the Parole Board to extend parole reconsideration periods to up to five years for certain murder convictions, reducing how often victims' families must attend hearings.
Why it matters
Reduces emotional burden on victims’ families. By allowing the Parole Board to set reconsideration dates up to five years apart for certain murder convictions, families are spared the trauma of frequently reliving their loss and testifying at repeated parole hearings.
Targets only the most serious offenses. The bill specifically applies to those convicted of first-degree murder, aggravated murder, and second-degree murder—where the sentence is not life without parole—ensuring the extended period is reserved for the most severe crimes.
Maintains board discretion and flexibility. The Parole Board can still use the current two-year period if circumstances warrant, but gains the option for a five-year interval when it is clear that early release is unlikely, balancing public safety and compassion for victims’ families.
Applies retroactively and moving forward. The law would impact not just future convictions, but also those already incarcerated for these offenses, potentially affecting a significant cohort of inmates and their victims’ families immediately.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Extend Parole Review Wait
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
History
- Referred to crime victims, crime and correction
- Referred to crime victims, crime and correction
Full text
3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
142
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE (Prefiled)
January 8, 2025
Introduced by Sens. PALUMBO, HELMING, MATTERA, OBERACKER, TEDISCO, WEIK -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Crime Victims, Crime and Correction
AN ACT to amend the executive law, in relation to the time in which reconsideration for parole shall be determined in the case of convictions for murder in the first degree, aggravated murder, and murder in the second degree, where a sentence other than death or life imprisonment without parole is imposed
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as "Lorraine's Law".
§ 2. Legislative findings and intent. This legislation is named in the memory of Lorraine Miranda who was a native of Shirley, Long Island. Despite being afflicted with Cerebral Palsy, she graduated from high school, moved to Staten Island, New York and worked tirelessly to help disabled children at the Port Richmond branch of United Cerebral Palsy of New York while attending college at night. She was engaged and was planning her wedding. In a tragic turn, Lorraine Miranda was brutally murdered by her fiancee on December 5, 1988. She was only 24 years old. Her killer was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison. He became eligible for parole in 2003 and has since been denied seven times.
Currently when parole is denied, the Parole Board has the discretion to set the date for reconsideration for parole for any date within two years of the denial of parole. In many cases, especially those involving heinous acts of murder in the first degree, aggravated murder, and murder in the second degree, parole will be denied numerous times. However, each time an inmate is considered for parole, the victim's family must relive the horror of the crime for the sake of impressing upon the Parole Board the inappropriateness of early release. Lorraine
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD00572-01-5
Miranda's mother, who has been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress syndrome, has stated that the agony of reliving her daughter's death every 24 months is unbearable and is a major trigger of panic symptoms which interfere with her quality of life.
It is not the intent of "Lorraine's Law" to in any way infringe upon the Parole Board's ability to allow for the current 24-month reconsideration period. It merely provides another option for the board to consider if it is apparent that nothing could transpire in the next five years that would cause them to render a different opinion regarding parole release. Only in these cases would the board have the ability to set the date for reconsideration anywhere between 24-months and 60-months which would afford grieving families a greater period of peace before having to testify at the next parole hearing.
§ 3. Subparagraph (i) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of section 259-i of the executive law, as amended by section 14 of chapter 486 of the laws of 2022, is amended to read as follows:
(i) Except as provided in subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph, at least one month prior to the date on which an incarcerated individual may be paroled pursuant to subdivision one of section 70.40 of the penal law, a member or members as determined by the rules of the board shall personally interview such incarcerated individual and determine whether [he or she] such person should be paroled in accordance with the guidelines adopted pursuant to subdivision four of section two hundred fifty-nine-c of this article. If parole is not granted upon such review, the incarcerated individual shall be informed in writing within two weeks of such appearance of the factors and reasons for such denial of parole. Such reasons shall be given in detail and not in conclusory terms. The board shall specify a date not more than twenty-four months from such determination for reconsideration, and the procedures to be followed upon reconsideration shall be the same, however in the case of a defendant sentenced for an eligible class A felony, the board shall specify a date not more than sixty months from such determination for reconsideration and the procedures to be followed for reconsideration shall be the same. For the purposes of this section an "eligible class A felony" shall mean a conviction for the class A-I felonies of: murder in the first degree as defined in section 125.27 of the penal law where a sentence other than death or life imprisonment without parole is imposed; aggravated murder as defined in section 125.26 of the penal law where a sentence other than death or life imprisonment without parole is imposed; and murder in the second degree as defined in section 125.25 of the penal law where a sentence other than life imprisonment without parole is imposed. If the incarcerated individual is released, [he or she] they shall be given a copy of the conditions of parole. Such conditions shall where appropriate, include a requirement that the parolee comply with any restitution order, mandatory surcharge, sex offender registration fee and DNA databank fee previously imposed by a court of competent jurisdiction that applies to the parolee. The conditions shall indicate which restitution collection agency established under subdivision eight of section 420.10 of the criminal procedure law, shall be responsible for collection of restitution, mandatory surcharge, sex offender registration fees and DNA databank fees as provided for in section 60.35 of the penal law and section eighteen hundred nine of the vehicle and traffic law. If the incarcerated individual is released, [he or she] such person shall also be notified in writing that [his or her] their voting rights will be restored upon release.
§ 4. Paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of section 259-i of the executive law, as amended by section 15 of chapter 486 of the laws of 2022, is amended to read as follows:
(a) At least one month prior to the expiration of the minimum period or periods of imprisonment fixed by the court or board, a member or members as determined by the rules of the board shall personally interview an incarcerated individual serving an indeterminate sentence and determine whether [he or she] such person should be paroled at the expiration of the minimum period or periods in accordance with the procedures adopted pursuant to subdivision four of section two hundred fifty-nine-c of this article. If parole is not granted upon such review, the incarcerated individual shall be informed in writing within two weeks of such appearance of the factors and reasons for such denial of parole. Such reasons shall be given in detail and not in conclusory terms. The board shall specify a date not more than twenty-four months from such determination for reconsideration, and the procedures to be followed upon reconsideration shall be the same, however in the case of a defendant sentenced for an eligible class A felony, the board shall specify a date not more than sixty months from such determination for reconsideration, and the procedures to be followed for reconsideration shall be the same. For the purposes of this section an "eligible class A felony" shall mean a conviction for the class A-I felonies of: murder in the first degree as defined in section 125.27 of the penal law where a sentence other than death or life imprisonment without parole is imposed; aggravated murder as defined in section 125.26 of the penal law where a sentence other than death or life imprisonment without parole is imposed; and murder in the second degree as defined in section 125.25 of the penal law where a sentence other than life imprisonment without parole is imposed. If the incarcerated individual is released, [he or she] they shall be given a copy of the conditions of parole. Such conditions shall where appropriate, include a requirement that the parolee comply with any restitution order and mandatory surcharge previously imposed by a court of competent jurisdiction that applies to the parolee. The conditions shall indicate which restitution collection agency established under subdivision eight of section 420.10 of the criminal procedure law, shall be responsible for collection of restitution and mandatory surcharge as provided for in section 60.35 of the penal law and section eighteen hundred nine of the vehicle and traffic law. If the incarcerated individual is released, [he or she] such person shall also be notified in writing that [his or her] their voting rights will be restored upon release.
§ 5. This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all future and currently incarcerated individuals sentenced for an eligible class A felony; provided that the amendments to subparagraph (i) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of section 259-i of the executive law made by section three of this act shall be subject to the expiration and reversion of such paragraph pursuant to subdivision d of section 74 of chapter 3 of the laws of 1995, as amended, when upon such date the provisions of section four of this act shall take effect.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the executive law, in relation to the time in which reconsideration for parole shall be determined in the case of convictions for murder in the first degree, aggravated murder, and murder in the second degree, where a sentence other than death or life imprisonment without parole is imposed
Purpose
This bill would extend the number of months from twenty-four to sixty as the time within which the parole board must set for reconsideration of a denied application for parole in cases where an inmate was sentenced for a violent crime.
Summary of provisions
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as "Lorraine's Law". Section 2. Legislative findings.
Read the full memo (750 words)
Section 3. Amends section 259-I (2) (a) (i) of the executive law by providing that should parole be denied, the board shall specify a date not more than sixty months from such determination for reconsideration in cases where an inmate was sentenced for an eligible Class A felony. For the purposes of this section an "eligible Class A felony" shall mean a conviction for the Class A-I felonies of : Murder in the first degree as defined in section 125.27 of the penal aw where a sentence other than death or life imprisonment without parole is imposed; aggravated murder as defined in section 125.26 of the penal law where a sentence where a sentence other than death or life imprisonment without parole is imposed; murder in the second degree as defined in section 125.25 of the penal law where a sentence other than life imprisonment without parole is imposed.
This section of law is subject to expiration and reversion pursuant to section 74 (d) of chapter 3 of the laws of 1995, and the proposed amend- ment is set to also be subject to such expiration and reversion.
Section 4. Makes the above amendments to section 259-I (2) (a) of the executive law which re scheduled to take effect when the provisions above expire.
Section 5. Effective date.
Justification
The legislation is to be known and may be cited as "Lorraine's Law" in the memory of Lorraine Miranda who was a native of Shirley, Long Island. She was brutally murdered by her fianc e on December 5, 1988 at the young age of 24 years old. Her killer was sentenced to 15 years to life in prison. He became eligible for parole in 2003 and has since been denied seven times.
Currently when parole is denied the Parole Board has the discretion to set the date for reconsideration for parole for any date within two years of the denial of parole. In many cases, especially those involving heinous acts of murder in the first degree, aggravated murder, and murder in the second degree, parole will be denied numerous times. However, each time an inmate is considered for parole, the victim's family must relive the horror of the crime for the sake of impressing upon the Parole Board the inappropriateness of early release.
It is important to note that it is not the intent of "Lorraine's Law" to, in any way infringe upon the Prole Board's ability to allow for the current 24-month reconsideration period. It merely provides another option for the board to consider if it is apparent that nothing could transpire in the next five years that would cause them to render a different opinion regarding parole release. Only in the cases described above would the board have the ability to set the date for reconsider- ation anywhere between 24 and 60 months which would afford grieving families a greater period of peace before having to testify at the next parole hearing
Legislative history
2024 S.2092; 2022 S.5175/A.5803; 2020 S.4353/A.6483; 2017-18 S.2997A/A.2350A; 2015-16 S.1483A/A.1680A; 2013-14 S2486A/A.2774A; 2011- 12 S.1861A; 2009-10 S.425.
Fiscal implications
This bill could result in some savings to the State by not requiring parole considerations that are unnecessary.
Effective date
This act shall take effect immediately and shall apply to all future and currently incarcerated individuals sentenced for an eligible Class A felony; provided that the amendments to subparagraph (i) of paragraph (a) of subdivision 2 of section 259-i of the executive law made by section one of this act shall be subject to the expiration and reversion of such paragraph pursuant to subdivision d of section 74 of Chapter 3 of the Laws of 1995, as amended, when upon such date the provisions of section two of this act shall take effect.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.