What's happening
This bill prohibits the use of algorithmic systems by rental property owners to artificially inflate prices or reduce the supply of rental housing in New York.
Why it matters
Targets “coordinating functions” used by landlords. The bill specifically defines and outlaws the use of software or analytics services that collect and process rental data from multiple property owners to set or coordinate rent prices, which addresses the growing use of data-driven “pricing cartels” in the housing market.
Expands liability and enforcement. Both property owners who use these algorithmic services and the companies (or individuals) who provide them (“coordinators”) can be held legally responsible. The Attorney General and the Division of Housing and Community Renewal are given broad powers to investigate, sue, and penalize violators, which could deter widespread adoption of such systems.
Nullifies restrictive arbitration and class-action waivers. Any pre-dispute arbitration agreements or waivers that would prevent tenants or others from taking collective legal action against unlawful algorithmic price coordination are made invalid, increasing access to legal remedies for affected renters.
Seeks to preserve local regulatory power. The bill explicitly states it does not override stricter local or tribal laws on rental pricing or anti-collusion, allowing cities or regions to maintain or adopt even tougher measures if desired.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Ban Algorithmic Rent Hikes
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
1 Co-sponsor
History
- Referred to judiciary
- Referred to judiciary
Full text
3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
1573
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE
January 10, 2025
Introduced by Sens. KRUEGER, CLEARE -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Judiciary
AN ACT to amend the real property law, in relation to prohibiting the use of algorithmic systems to artificially inflate the price or reduce the supply of leased or rented residential dwelling units in the state
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "New York Preventing the Algorithmic Facilitation of Rental Housing Cartels Act of 2024".
§ 2. The real property law is amended by adding a new section 222-a to read as follows:
§ 222-a. Algorithmic systems. 1. As used in this section:
(a) "Consciously parallel pricing coordination" means a tacit agreement between two or more rental property owners to raise, lower, change, maintain, or manipulate pricing for the purchase or sale of reasonably interchangeable products or services.
(b) "Coordinating function" means:
(i) collecting historical or contemporaneous prices, supply levels, or lease or rental contract termination and renewal dates of residential dwelling units from two or more rental property owners;
(ii) analyzing or processing of the information described in subparagraph (i) of this paragraph using a system, software, or process that uses computation, including by using that information to train an algorithm; and
(iii) recommending rental prices, lease renewal terms, or ideal occupancy levels to a rental property owner.
(c) "Coordinator" means any person that operates a software or data analytics service that performs a coordinating function for any rental property owner, including a rental property owner performing a coordinating function for their own benefit.
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD03759-01-5
(d) "Division" means the division of housing and community renewal.
(e) "Person" means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, trustee, municipality or other legal entity, including corporations and associations existing under or authorized by the laws of either the United States, the laws of any of the territories, the laws of any state, or the laws of any foreign country; provided that "person" shall not include the state or any state agency.
(f) "Pre-dispute arbitration agreement" means an agreement between two or more parties to arbitrate a dispute between the parties that is made before any dispute has arisen.
(g) "Pre-dispute joint action waiver" means an agreement between two or more parties, which may be part of a pre-dispute arbitration agreement, that:
(i) would prohibit or waive the right of a party to participate in a joint, class, or collective action in a judicial, arbitral, administrative, or other forum relating to a dispute between two parties; and
(ii) is made before any dispute has arisen.
(h) "Residential dwelling unit" means any house, apartment, accessory unit, or other unit intended to be used as a primary residence; provided that "residential dwelling unit" does not include inpatient medical care, licensed long-term care, and detention or correctional facilities.
(i) "Rental property owner" means any individual, corporation, partnership, association, joint-stock company, trust, or unincorporated organization that owns real property and leases or rents such property or any portion thereof in the form of four or more residential dwelling units.
2. It is unlawful for:
(a) a rental property owner, in or affecting commerce, or any agent or subcontractor thereof, to subscribe to, contract with, or otherwise exchange anything of value in return for the services of a coordinator;
(b) a coordinator, in or affecting commerce, to facilitate an agreement among rental property owners to not compete with respect to residential dwelling units, including by performing a coordinating function; or
(c) any coordinator, in or affecting commerce, to acquire, directly or indirectly, the whole or any part of the stock or other share capital of another coordinator if the acquisition would create an appreciable risk of materially lessening competition, or tend to create a monopoly or monopsony, and any such acquisition shall be deemed a violation of this section.
3. (a) In addition to any other action or proceeding authorized by law, the attorney general may bring an action or special proceeding in the supreme court, in the name and on behalf of the people of the state of New York, against a person violating the provisions of this section to enjoin such person from continuing the violation or engaging in any acts in furtherance thereof, to compel compliance with the provisions of this section and/or to recover any monetary penalty for such violation. Any such action or proceeding may be compromised or discontinued on application of the department upon such terms as the court shall approve and order.
(b) If the department has reason to believe that a person violated this section, the department may commence a civil action, in its own name by any of its attorneys designated by it for such purpose, to recover a civil penalty and seek other appropriate relief in any court of competent jurisdiction.
(c) All monies recovered in any such action or special proceeding, together with the costs thereof shall be paid into the state treasury to the credit of the general fund.
4. In a civil action under this section, a complaint:
(a) plausibly pleads a violation of this section and if the complaint contains factual allegations, including allegations of consciously parallel pricing coordination, demonstrating that the existence of a contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce is among the realm of plausible possibilities; and
(b) need not allege facts tending to exclude the possibility of independent action.
5. A pre-dispute arbitration agreement or pre-dispute joint action waiver relating to a violation of this section shall be invalid or unenforceable.
6. Nothing in this section shall be construed to preempt any state, tribal, city, or local law, regulation, or ordinance that explicitly supplements this section.
§ 3. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or part of this act shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the legislature that this act would have been enacted even if such invalid provisions had not been included herein.
§ 4. This act shall take effect immediately.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the real property law, in relation to prohibiting the use of algorithmic systems to artificially inflate the price or reduce the supply of leased or rented residential dwelling units in the state
Purpose
To prevent the use of algorithmic systems to artificially inflate the price or reduce the supply of leased or rented residential dwelling units
Summary of provisions
Section 1 Provides that the bill be known as the New York Preventing the Algorithmic Facilitation of Rental Housing Cartels Act of 2024.
Section 2 creates a new section of the Real Property Law and sets defi- nitions for algorithmic systems. This section further makes it unlawful for rental property owners to use algorithmic systems to set the rent.
Section 3 Severability. Section 4 Effective Date
Justification
A 2022 ProPublica article shone a light on the use of algorithmic soft- ware and how landlords and property managers were using this software to artificially increase rents. One company has even bragged that their software will help property managers increase rent 7% higher than what the market should allow them to charge. The artificial increase in rents in cities across the country and have greatly contributed to the acute housing crisis facing communities across the country and in New York.
By banning the use of these algorithms and software, this bill aims to ensure fairness and transparency in the rental housing market. It sets clear boundaries against behaviors that may lead to anti-competitive practices and price-fixing.
Legislative history
2023-24: S.9169 - Referred to judiciary
Fiscal implications
None
Effective date
Immediately
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.