What's happening
This bill limits robocalls to New York residents, requires phone providers to offer free call-blocking technology, and increases penalties for violations.
Why it matters
Defines and restricts robocalls more precisely. The bill expands the definition of "robocall" to include both phone calls and text messages made using automatic dialing devices or prerecorded voices, and only allows such calls in limited situations (emergencies, with consent, by labor organizations to members, or as permitted by specific regulations). This closes loopholes that robocallers could previously exploit.
Empowers consumers and increases transparency. Consumers can now revoke their consent to robocalls at any time and by any reasonable means, making it easier to opt out. Robocalls using prerecorded voices must disclose the caller’s identity and purpose at the start and end of the call, helping recipients identify unwanted or fraudulent calls.
Holds phone providers accountable. Telephone service providers in New York must offer free call-blocking and mitigation technology to all customers, and must block or divert calls/texts likely to be robocalls—except for those from law enforcement or public safety. Providers also must honor customer requests to block specific numbers, and could face regulatory scrutiny and waivers only in cases of clear technical limitations.
Strengthens enforcement and penalties. The bill increases civil penalties for violations, including higher fines for caller ID spoofing ($5,000–$10,000 per violation) and gives consumers the right to sue for up to $500 per illegal call (tripled if violations are willful). It also requires annual public reporting on robocall issues and provider compliance, increasing oversight and public accountability.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Limit Robocalls, Block Spam
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
23 Co-sponsors
- Joseph P. Addabbo Jr.
- Jamaal Bailey
- Leroy Comrie
- Simcha Felder
- Andrew Gounardes
- Pete Harckham
- Michelle Hinchey
- Robert Jackson
- Brian Kavanagh
- Liz Krueger
- John Liu
- Rachel May
- Shelley Mayer
- Zellnor Myrie
- Kevin S. Parker
- Roxanne J. Persaud
- Jessica Ramos
- Gustavo Rivera
- Julia Salazar
- James Sanders Jr.
- Luis R. Sepúlveda
- José M. Serrano
- Toby Ann Stavisky
History
- Referred to consumer protection
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Limit Robocalls, Require Free Blocking
In Assembly Committee · Corporations, Authorities And Commissions · Sponsor Simcha Eichenstein
Full text
6 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
859
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
IN SENATE (Prefiled)
January 8, 2025
Introduced by Sens. HOYLMAN-SIGAL, ADDABBO, BAILEY, COMRIE, FELDER, GOUNARDES, HARCKHAM, HINCHEY, JACKSON, KAVANAGH, KRUEGER, LIU, MAY, MAYER, MYRIE, PARKER, PERSAUD, RAMOS, RIVERA, SALAZAR, SANDERS, SEPULVEDA, SERRANO, STAVISKY -- read twice and ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to the Committee on Consumer Protection
AN ACT to amend the general business law, in relation to limiting robocalls to state residents and to require telephone service providers to offer free call mitigation technology to telephone customers
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "robocall prevention act".
§ 2. Section 399-p of the general business law, as amended by chapter 581 of the laws of 1992, subdivision 6 as amended by chapter 546 of the laws of 2000, subdivision 6-a as added and subdivision 8 as amended by chapter 176 of the laws of 1998, is amended to read as follows:
§ 399-p. [Telemarketing; use] Use of automatic [dialing-announcing] dialing devices and placement of robocalls and consumer telephone calls. 1. Definitions. As used in this section, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
(a) "automatic [dialing-announcing] dialing device" means [any automatic equipment which incorporates a storage capability of telephone numbers to be called and is used, working alone or in conjunction with other equipment, to disseminate a prerecorded message to the telephone number called without the use of an operator] equipment that makes a series of calls to stored telephone numbers, including numbers stored on a list, except for equipment that requires a human to dial or place each individual call one call at a time, and requires such human to then remain on each call;
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD02940-01-5
(b) "person" means any natural person, firm, organization, partnership, association or corporation, or other entity, whether for-profit or not-for-profit;
(c) "consumer" means a natural person who is solicited to purchase, lease or receive a good or service for personal, family or household use;
(d) "consumer telephone call" means a call made to a telephone number by a telephone solicitor, whether by device, live operator, or any combination thereof, for the purpose of soliciting a sale of any consumer goods or services for personal, family or household purposes to the consumer called, or for the purpose of soliciting an extension of credit for consumer goods or services to the consumer called, or for the purpose of obtaining information that will or may be used for the direct solicitation of a sale of consumer goods or services to the consumer called or an extension of credit for such purposes; provided, however, that "consumer telephone call" shall not include a call made by a telephone corporation, as defined by subdivision seventeen of section two of the public service law, in response to a specific inquiry initiated by a consumer regarding that consumer's existing or requested telephone service; [and]
(e) "telephone solicitor" means a person who makes or causes to be made a consumer telephone call;
(f) "robocall" means a call made, including a text message sent, to any telephone number owned by a person or entity in the state:
(1) using an automatic dialing device; or
(2) using an artificial or prerecorded voice;
(g) "call mitigation technology" means technology that identifies an incoming call or text message as being, or as probably being, an unwanted robocall, and, on that basis, blocks the call or message, diverts it to the called person's answering system, or otherwise prevents it from being completed to the called person, except that it permits a call or text so identified to be completed when it is identified as being made by a law enforcement or public safety entity;
(h) "prior express consent" for a call means that the purpose of the call must be closely related to the purpose for which the telephone number was originally provided by the called party. A call by a non-profit organization which is federally tax exempt pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 501(c), to a member who had joined such organization or to the household of such a member, is presumed to be closely related. A customer's prior express consent can be revoked by the customer at any time in any reasonable manner, regardless of the context in which the owner or user of the telephone provided consent;
(i) "telephone service provider" means any company that provides voice service utilizing any technology, regardless of whether such provider is regulated pursuant to the public service law;
(j) "labor organization" means any organization of any kind which exists for the purpose, in whole or in part, of representing employees employed within the state of New York in dealing with employers or employer organizations or with a state government, or any political or civil subdivision or other agency thereof, concerning terms and conditions of employment, grievances, labor disputes, or other matters incidental to the employment relationship. For the purposes of this section, each local, parent national or parent international organization of a statewide labor organization, and each statewide federation receiving dues from subsidiary labor organizations, shall be considered a separate labor organization; and
(k) "department" means the department of state.
2. No person shall [operate an automatic dialing-announcing device] make any robocall, nor place any consumer telephone call, except in accordance with the provisions of this section. The [use of such device] making of a robocall by any person, either individually or acting as an officer, agent, or employee of a person [operating automatic dialing-announcing devices] making a robocall, is subject to the provisions of this section.
2-a. (a) A person shall be permitted to make a robocall only when such robocall is:
(1) made for emergency purposes, pursuant to subdivision seven of this section;
(2) made with the prior express consent of the called party;
(3) made by a labor organization to such organization's members or to the household of such members; or
(4) authorized by regulations promulgated by the department pursuant to paragraph (b) of this subdivision.
(b) The department, in consultation with the department of public service, shall promulgate regulations to implement the provisions of this subdivision, and may permit, subject to such conditions as the department may prescribe, robocalls to be made to a residential telephone line without prior express consent if such calls are not made for a commercial purpose.
3. [Whenever telephone calls are placed through the use of an automatic dialing-announcing device, such device shall do all of the following] In addition to the provisions of subdivision two-a of this section:
(a) If a robocall or consumer telephone call permitted by this section uses a prerecorded voice, such call shall state at the beginning of the call the nature of the call and the name of the person or on whose behalf the message is being transmitted and at the end of such message the address, and telephone number of the person on whose behalf the message is transmitted, provided such disclosures are not otherwise prohibited or restricted by any federal, state or local law; and
(b) If a robocall permitted by this section is made using an automatic dialing device, such device shall disconnect [the automatic dialing-announcing device] from the telephone line upon the termination of the call by either the person calling or the person called.
4. No person shall operate an automatic [dialing-announcing] dialing device which uses a random or sequential number generator to produce a number to be called.
4-a. (a) No person making a robocall shall knowingly cause any caller identification service to transmit misleading, inaccurate, or false caller identification information with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value.
(b) This subdivision does not prohibit:
(1) Any authorized activity of a law enforcement agency; or
(2) Any activity pursuant to a court order that specifically authorizes the use of caller identification manipulation.
4-b. (a) A telephone service provider that provides telephone service to customers residing in the state shall make call mitigation technology available to any such customer, upon request, and at no additional charge. Such provider shall also offer to any such customer the ability to have the provider prevent calls and text messages identified as originating from a particular person from being completed to the called person, upon request, and at no additional charge.
(b) The department, in consultation with the department of public service, shall promulgate regulations to implement the requirements of this subdivision, including, if appropriate, a reasonable delay in requiring implementation and offering of call mitigation technology if for good cause, taking into account the consumer protection purposes of this section, and including procedures for addressing incidents in which a call wanted by the customer is prevented from reaching the customer. The department may also promulgate regulations allowing for the requirements of this subdivision to be waived for existing network facilities in instances where the telephone service provider can reasonably demonstrate that call mitigation technology cannot feasibly be implemented on such facilities due to technological limitations, until such time as it can be feasibly implemented.
5. No [automatic dialing-announcing device shall be used to call and no] robocall or consumer telephone call shall be placed to an emergency telephone line including but not limited to any 911 or E-911 line, or any emergency line of any volunteer fire company or fire department; any emergency medical service, ambulance service, voluntary ambulance service or hospital ambulance service as defined in section three thousand one of the public health law; any hospital, nursing home, or residential health care facility as defined in section twenty-eight hundred one of the public health law; any adult care facility as defined in section two of the social services law; or any law enforcement agency or to the telephone line of any guest room or patient room of any hospital, nursing home, or residential health care facility as defined in section two thousand eight hundred one of the public health law, or any adult care facility as defined by section two of the social services law. It shall not constitute a violation of this subdivision if the person who places such a call can affirmatively establish that the call was placed inadvertently despite good faith efforts on the part of such person to comply with the provisions of this section and such person has implemented a procedure to prevent subsequent calls from being placed to a particular prohibited telephone number.
6. A telephone solicitor shall not make a consumer telephone call to a consumer unless the telephone solicitor conforms with subparagraph one of paragraph b of subdivision six of section three hundred ninety-ninepp of this article. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to limit, annul, alter, or affect the provisions of subdivision three of this section.
6-a. No telephone solicitor or person who places any consumer telephone call or [who operates an automatic dialing-announcing device] robocall and no employer of any such telephone solicitor or person shall intentionally cause to be installed, or shall intentionally utilize, any blocking device or service to prevent the name and/or telephone number of such solicitor or person, or the name and/or telephone number of [his or her] such person's employer, from being displayed on a caller identification device of the recipient of any such consumer telephone call. A violation of this subdivision shall be subject to the provisions of subdivision eight of this section.
7. (a) Federal, state or local municipalities, or any subdivision thereof, [using an automatic dialing-announcing device] making a robocall for emergency purposes shall be exempted from the provisions of this section.
(b) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this subdivision, any entity [which operates] making a robocall for emergency purposes through the operation of a telephone warning or alert system [which utilizes any such device for emergency purposes] shall also be exempted from the provisions of this section.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Sponsor's memo
Title of bill
An act to amend the general business law, in relation to limiting robo- calls to state residents and to require telephone service providers to offer free call mitigation technology to telephone customers
Summary of provisions
Section 1 of the bill establishes that the act shall be known and cited as the "Robocall Prevention Act."
Section 2 of the bill amends Section 399-p of the General Business Law by renaming it "Use of automatic dialing devices and placement of robo- calls and consumer telephone calls", and makes the following changes to such section:
Read the full memo (1,184 words)
Subdivision 1: changes the term "automatic dialing-announcing device" to "automatic dialing device" and amends its definition, and adds defi- nitions for the terms "robocall", "call mitigation technology", "prior express consent", "telephone service provider", "labor organization", and "department".
Subdivision 2: prohibits making robocalls or placing consumer telephone calls except in accordance with the provisions of Section 399-P GBL.
New Subdivision 2-a: provides that it is only lawful for a person to make a robocall when it is made for emergency purposes, made with the prior express consent of the called party, made by a labor organization to its own members or their households, or otherwise authorized by the Department of State in limited circumstances. A customer can revoke his or her "prior express consent" at any time in any reasonable manner. This subdivision also authorizes the Department of State, in consulta- tion with the Department of Public Service, to permit robocalls to be made to residential telephone lines without prior express consent if they are not made for a commercial purpose.
Subdivisions 3: makes conforming changes to existing law. Subdivision 4: makes conforming changes to existing law. New Subdivision 4-a: prohib- its any person making a robocall from knowingly causing a caller ID service to transmit misleading, inaccurate, or false caller ID informa- tion with the intent to defraud, cause harm, or wrongfully obtain anything of value. New Subdivision 4-b: requires that a telephone service provider operating in the state must make call mitigation tech- nology available to any customer, upon request, at no additional charge. The Department of State, in consultation with the Department of Public Service, would be required to promulgate regulations to implement the requirements of this subdivision, and would be authorized to allow a reasonable delay for requiring implementation of call mitigation tech- nology for good cause. The Department would also be authorized to allow for tee requirements of this subdivision to be waived for network facil- ities where such technology cannot feasibly be implemented due to tech- nological limitations.'
This subdivision is intended to require the implementation of call miti- gation technology where feasible, and is not intended to require the implementation of such technology where it cannot reasonably be imple- mented, such as for copper telephone lines. Subdivision 5: makes conforming changes to existing law. Subdivision
6: left unchanged. Subdivision 6-a: makes conforming changes to existing law. Subdivision
7: makes conforming changes to existing law. Subdivision 8: allows the NYS Attorney General to enforce subdivisions 2, 3, 4, 4-a, 5, 6, and 6-a of Section 399-p, and provides penalties for violations of those subdi- visions. Subdivision 9: allows any person harmed by a violation of subdivision 2, 3, 4, 4-a, or 5 of Section 399-p to bring an action in court to enjoin such violation and recover damages, and increases the minimum amount of such damages available. Subdivision 10: requires the Department of State, in consultation with the Department of Public Service, to report on issues relating to robocalls and the implementa- tion of call mitigation technology.
Section 3 of the bill amends paragraph b of subdivision 11 of Section 399-pp of the GBL to increase the penalties for violating the prohibi- tion in subdivision 7-a of that section on knowingly transmitting misleading, inaccurate, or false caller ID information.
Section 4 of the bill is a severability clause.
Section 5 of the bill establishes the effective date.
Justification
According to YouMail, a company that tracks robocalls and offers a call blocking application, over 47.8 billion robocalls were placed nationwide in 2018. Continuing the trend, 25 billion robocalls have been placed in the first five months of 2019. Unwanted robocalls have also dispropor- tionately targeted New Yorkers, as New York City ranked 3 in the country in February 2019 with over 162 million robocalls received, and Buffalo ranked 19 with almost 50 million robocalls received. New Yorkers have received over 1.5 billion robocalls so far in 2019.
Increasingly lax oversight and the proliferation of new technology have led to the rise in robocalls. Under the Federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act, almost all non-emergency auto-dialed calls to mobile phones are illegal, but the exemptions are beginning to swallow the rules as businesses regularly successfully petition the Federal Communi- cations Commission for exemptions to any restrictions. Furthermore, land-lines have very limited protections, disproportionately impacting the elderly. Technologically, the advent of Voice-over-Internet-Protocol (VOIP) dialing has allowed companies to discharge millions of calls for pennies and spoofing, or the ability to fake a telephone number, makes consumers even more vulnerable to unwanted calls and scams. This tech- nology has undermined the effectiveness of the federal government's Do Not Call Registry, which long protected Americans from telemarketers. This bill provides New Yorkers with strong protections against illegal robocalls by requiring their prior express consent to receive such calls (which can be revoked at any time), prohibiting fraudulent spoofing activity, and authorizing strong enforcement action against those making these illegal calls.
The bill also requires telephone service providers to provide consumers with technology that can identify and block likely unwanted calls. This technology is currently offered by several providers. The FCC recently ruled that providers may block unwanted robocalls by default, and has repeatedly urged providers to implement call authentication technology to identify likely spoofed calls, and to offer call blocking technology to consumers. Although some providers do offer call mitigation technolo- gy for free, others charge for its services, or haven't made it widely available or easy to use, especially for VoIP landline phones. This bill would require that this technology be made available free of charge, to any consumer who requests it.
Robocalls are more than a nuisance. They undermine both privacy and safety, use up low-income consumer's limited minutes and subject consum- ers to harassing and intrusive telemarketing and debt collection tactics. With this bill, consumers will regain control and no longer have to suffer through a daily barrage of unwanted calls.
Legislative history
S.1536 of 2023-2024 (Hoylman-Sigal): Died in Consumer Protection
S.0068 of 2021-2022 (Hoylman): Died in Consumer Protection
S.3297-D of 2019-2020 (Hoylman): Advanced to Third Reading
A.0675-D of 2019-2020 (Niou): Died in Corporations, Authorities and Commissions
S.804 of 2018 (Hoylman): Died in Energy & Telecommunications
Effective date
This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall have become a law. Effective immediately, the addition, amendment and/or repeal of any rule or regulation necessary for the implementation of this act on its effective date are authorized and directed to be made and completed on or before such effective date.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.