Skip to content
A10296Assembly2009-2010 SessionSame asS4155

Relates to eminent domain in N.Y. city

Sponsor James F. BrennanAD-44Affects Legal
Status
In Assembly Committee
Judiciary
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Judiciary

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
James F. Brennan

Assembly Member · Assembly District 44

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to judiciary

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

S4155Senate

Relates to eminent domain in N.Y. city

In Senate Committee · Corporations, Authorities And Commissions · Sponsor Velmanette Montgomery

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

BILL NUMBER:A10296

Title of bill

An act to amend the public authorities law, in relation to eminent domain in cities with a population of one million or more

Purpose

To amend the public authorities law authorizing the city coun- cil to approve or disapprove by a majority vote any public authorities or public benefit corporation's use of eminent domain.

Summary of provisions

Adds new section 2901 to the public authorities law authorizing the city council in cities with a population of one million or more to approve or disapprove by a majority vote any public authorities or public benefit corporation's use of eminent domain. The city council is also required to hold at least one official public hear- ing on the proposed action prior to voting.

Justification

Continued scrutiny of public authorities and the recent Supreme Court eminent domain decision illustrate the need for greater local control over takings by public authorities. The continued work by the Assembly Corporations committee as well as others illustrates the fundamental problem with public authorities. They have public missions but are isolated from traditional democratic pressure, and therefore lack accountability to the people of this State. This fundamental prob- lem is evidenced in takings cases. Most authorities have eminent domain power that can be exercised even over the objection of local govern- ments. The statutory power of eminent domain coupled with the recent Supreme Court decision (Kelo v. City of New London) is the clarion call for reform.

This bill would safeguard the interests of the public and communities around this State by adding more traditional democratic control and oversight over the use of takings by public authorities. This bill would ensure that use of eminent domain by public authorities is adequately scrutinized by local elected officials following and that the public has an opportunity to comment on projects/proposals that impact on their quality of life.

Legislative history

2005-2006: S.5949 Died in Committee

Fiscal implications

Not known.

Effective date

This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it becomes law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.