Skip to content
S4155Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA10296

Relates to eminent domain in N.Y. city

Sponsor Velmanette MontgomerySD-18+3 co-sponsorsAffects Economy
Status
In Senate Committee
Corporations, Authorities And Commissions
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Corporations, Authorities And Commissions

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Velmanette Montgomery

Senator · Senate District 18

History

  1. Referred to corporations, authorities and commissions
  2. Referred to corporations, authorities and commissions

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A10296Assembly

Relates to eminent domain in N.Y. city

In Assembly Committee · Judiciary · Sponsor James F. Brennan

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the public authorities law, in relation to eminent domain in cities with a population of one million or more

Purpose

To amend the public authorities law authorizing the city council to approve or disapprove by a majority vote any public authorities or public benefit corporation's use of eminent domain.

Summary of provisions

Adds new section 2901 to the public authorities law authorizing the city council in cities with a population of one million or more to approve or disapprove by a majority vote any public authorities or public benefit corporation's use of eminent domain. The city council is also required to hold at least one official public hearing on the proposed action prior to voting.

Justification

Continued scrutiny of public authorities and the recent Supreme Court eminent domain decision illustrate the need for greater local control over takings by public authorities. The continued work by the Assembly Corporations committee as well as others illustrates the fundamental problem with public authorities. They have public missions but are isolated from traditional democratic pressure, and therefore lack accountability to the people of this State. This fundamental problem is evidenced in takings cases. Most authorities have eminent domain power that can be exercised even over the objection of local governments. The statutory power of eminent domain coupled with the recent Supreme Court decision (Kelo v. City of New London) is the clarion call for reform, This bill would safeguard the interests of the public and communities around this State by adding more traditional democratic control and oversight over the use of takings by public authorities, This bill would ensure that use of eminent domain by public authorities is adequately scrutinized by local elected officials following and that the public has an opportunity to comment on projects/proposals that impact on their quality of life.

Legislative history

2005-2006: S.5949 Died in Committee

Fiscal implications

Not known.

Effective date

This act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it becomes law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.