Skip to content
S7406Senate2009-2010 SessionSame asA9993

Relates to the projection of increases in school enrollment

Sponsor Hugh T. FarleySD-44Affects Education
Status
In Senate Committee
Education
Impact
Pending
Passage
Pending

Bill progress

Step 2 of 7

In committee · Education

What's happening

Writing a plain-English summary… Track this bill to get it by email.

Why it matters

The daily · weekday mornings

Albany, before your first meeting.

Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.

Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.

Who cares

Headline styles

Sponsors

Primary sponsor
Hugh T. Farley

Senator · Senate District 44

No co-sponsors yet.

History

  1. Referred to education

Companion bill

The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.

A9993Assembly

Relates to the projection of increases in school enrollment

In Assembly Committee · Education · Sponsor George Amedore

Full text

The text isn't available here yet. Check nysenate.gov.

Sponsor's memo

Title of bill

An act to amend the education law, in relation to the projection of increases in school enrollment

Purpose

To clarify the definition of student enrollment to be used when expenditures are calculated for a contingency budget.

Summary of provisions

The bill specifies that for purposes of developing a contingency budget, a school district shall use a student enrollment figure as computed under paragraph g, subdivision two, section thirty-six hundred two of the Education Law. This section sets out the method for computing "total aidable foundation pupil units."

Existing law

Existing law does not require the use of a specific method for computing an enrollment projection for developing contingency budgets.

Justification

This legislation is intended to provide consistency in the use of information in developing contingency budgets.

In at least one known instance, the contingency budget prepared by a school district used a projected enrollment figure that was higher than the figure used in the original, defeated budget and also in the second, proposed budget that was being submitted to voters. This led to the contingency budget being larger than the second, proposed budget and would have required a larger increase in the proposed tax levy than would have been necessary under the second, proposed budget.

This outcome was contrary to the intended purpose of the contingency budget as an option when school district voters reject proposed school budgets.

By using an established, statutory definition and method for calculating enrollment, this figure cannot be the subject of manipulation when contingency budgets are calculated and compared to proposed budgets.

Legislative history

New bill.

Fiscal implications

None.

Local fiscal implications

None.

Effective date

The first of July next succeeding the date on which it shall have become law.

Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.