What's happening
This bill expands dispute resolution protections to cover excess charges from non-participating hospitals after emergency visits, with some exceptions for safety net hospitals.
Why it matters
By expanding dispute resolution protections to include non-participating hospitals (not just physicians), the bill closes a major loophole that previously left patients vulnerable to large, unexpected hospital bills after emergency care. This means more New Yorkers will be protected from "surprise bills" when they need urgent treatment at hospitals outside their insurance network.
The bill specifically covers excess charges for both the initial emergency room visit and any inpatient services that follow, addressing a frequent scenario where patients are admitted after an emergency and face high, unanticipated costs. This ensures broader and more meaningful financial protection after emergencies.
A clear and binding independent dispute resolution process between hospitals and insurers will now exist, helping resolve billing disputes faster and more predictably. This may reduce litigation and administrative costs, and could also encourage hospitals and insurers to negotiate more reasonable rates upfront.
Importantly, the legislation exempts hospitals designated as safety net facilities (serving a high percentage of Medicaid, uninsured, or dual-eligible patients), aiming to preserve their financial stability and ability to serve vulnerable populations, while still addressing surprise billing at other hospitals. This balances consumer protection with the need to support hospitals critical to underserved communities.
Albany, before your first meeting.
Every bill that moved yesterday, summarized in a sentence and ranked by impact. The Albany Scorecard follows on Sundays.
Free. Unsubscribe in one click. Want alerts on specific bills? Create an account.
Who cares
Headline styles
Limit Emergency Hospital Charges
Plain English, a few words. Used as the page title.
Sponsors
11 Co-sponsors
2 Multi-sponsors
History
- Signed chap.375
- Delivered to governor
- Returned to assembly
- Passed senateVote 62–0
- 3rd reading cal.1598
- Substituted for S3171A
- Referred to rules
- Delivered to senate
- Passed assembly
- Ruling of chair on point of order
- Ordered to third reading rules cal.65
- Rules report cal.65
Show 8 earlier actions
- Reported
- Reported referred to rules
- Reported referred to codes
- Print number 264b
- Amend (t) and recommit to insurance
- Print number 264a
- Amend (t) and recommit to insurance
- Referred to insurance
Companion bill
The same bill in the other chamber. A bill becomes law when one version passes both houses and the governor signs it, so either number can carry it.
Limit Hospital ER Charges
Senate Floor Calendar · Sponsor Liz Krueger
Full text
3 pagesUnderlined is new[Struck] is removedOfficial text on nysenate.gov ↗
STATE OF NEW YORK
264--B
2019-2020 Regular Sessions
IN ASSEMBLY (Prefiled)
January 9, 2019
Introduced by M. of A. CAHILL, COLTON, ARROYO, JEAN-PIERRE, TAYLOR, McDONOUGH, JACOBSON -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. EPSTEIN -- read once and referred to the Committee on Insurance -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee -- again reported from said committee with amendments, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee
AN ACT to amend the financial services law, in relation to establishing protections from excess hospital charges
The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate and Assembly, do enact as follows:
Section 1. Section 605 of the financial services law, as added by section 26 of part H of chapter 60 of the laws of 2014, is amended to read as follows:
§ 605. Dispute resolution for emergency services. (a) Emergency services for an insured. (1) When a health care plan receives a bill for emergency services from a non-participating physician or hospital, including a bill for inpatient services which follow an emergency room visit, the health care plan shall pay an amount that it determines is reasonable for the emergency services rendered by the non-participating physician or hospital, in accordance with section three thousand two hundred twenty-four-a of the insurance law, except for the insured's co-payment, coinsurance or deductible, if any, and shall ensure that the insured shall incur no greater out-of-pocket costs for the emergency services than the insured would have incurred with a participating physician or hospital pursuant to subsection (c) of section three thousand two hundred forty-one of the insurance law.
(2) A non-participating physician or hospital or a health care plan may submit a dispute regarding a fee or payment for emergency services for review to an independent dispute resolution entity. In cases where a health care plan submits a dispute regarding a fee for payment of a
EXPLANATION--Matter in italics (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD03101-05-9
A. 264--B 2
non-participating hospital's emergency services, the health care plan shall, after the initial payment, pay any additional amounts it determines is reasonable directly to the non-participating hospital.
(3) The independent dispute resolution entity shall make a determination within thirty days of receipt of the dispute for review.
(4) In determining a reasonable fee for the services rendered, an independent dispute resolution entity shall select either the health care plan's payment or the non-participating physician's or hospital's fee. The independent dispute resolution entity shall determine which amount to select based upon the conditions and factors set forth in section six hundred four of this article. If an independent dispute resolution entity determines, based on the health care plan's payment and the non-participating physician's or hospital's fee, that a settlement between the health care plan and non-participating physician or hospital is reasonably likely, or that both the health care plan's payment and the non-participating physician's or hospital's fee represent unreasonable extremes, then the independent dispute resolution entity may direct both parties to attempt a good faith negotiation for settlement. The health care plan and non-participating physician or hospital may be granted up to ten business days for this negotiation, which shall run concurrently with the thirty day period for dispute resolution.
(b) Emergency services for a patient that is not an insured. (1) A patient that is not an insured or the patient's physician may submit a dispute regarding a fee for emergency services for review to an independent dispute resolution entity upon approval of the superintendent.
(2) An independent dispute resolution entity shall determine a reasonable fee for the services based upon the same conditions and factors set forth in section six hundred four of this article.
(3) A patient that is not an insured shall not be required to pay the physician's or hospital's fee in order to be eligible to submit the dispute for review to an independent dispute resolution entity.
(c) The determination of an independent dispute resolution entity shall be binding on the health care plan, physician or hospital and patient, and shall be admissible in any court proceeding between the health care plan, physician or hospital or patient, or in any administrative proceeding between this state and the physician or hospital.
(d) The provisions of this section shall not apply to hospitals that had at least sixty percent of inpatient discharges annually which consisted of medicaid, uninsured, and dual eligible individuals as determined by the department of health in its determination of safety net hospitals.
§ 2. Subsection (a) of section 608 of the financial services law, as added by section 26 of part H of chapter 60 of the laws of 2014, is amended to read as follows:
(a) For disputes involving an insured, when the independent dispute resolution entity determines the health care plan's payment is reasonable, payment for the dispute resolution process shall be the responsibility of the non-participating physician or hospital. When the independent dispute resolution entity determines the non-participating physician's or hospital's fee is reasonable, payment for the dispute resolution process shall be the responsibility of the health care plan. When a good faith negotiation directed by the independent dispute resolution entity pursuant to paragraph four of subsection (a) of section six hundred five of this article, or paragraph six of subsection (a) of section six hundred seven of this article results in a settlement
A. 264--B 3
between the health care plan and non-participating physician or hospital, the health care plan and the non-participating physician or hospital shall evenly divide and share the prorated cost for dispute resolution.
§ 3. Section 604 of the financial services law, as added by section 26 of part H of chapter 60 of the laws of 2014, is amended to read as follows:
§ 604. Criteria for determining a reasonable fee. In determining the appropriate amount to pay for a health care service, an independent dispute resolution entity shall consider all relevant factors, including:
(a) whether there is a gross disparity between the fee charged by the [physician] health care provider for services rendered as compared to:
(1) fees paid to the involved [physician] health care provider for the same services rendered by the [physician] health care provider to other patients in health care plans in which the [physician] health care provider is not participating, and
(2) in the case of a dispute involving a health care plan, fees paid by the health care plan to reimburse similarly qualified [physicians] health care providers for the same services in the same region who are not participating with the health care plan;
(b) the level of training, education and experience of the [physician] health care provider;
(c) the [physician's] health care provider's usual charge for comparable services with regard to patients in health care plans in which the [physician] health care provider is not participating;
(d) the circumstances and complexity of the particular case, including time and place of the service;
(e) individual patient characteristics; and, with regard to physician services,
(f) the usual and customary cost of the service.
§ 4. This act shall take effect immediately.
Reflowed for reading: line numbers and page breaks removed. Cite the official text.
Summaries, headlines and scores are AI-generated from the official bill text. How we score bills. Source: NYS Open Legislation.